aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorArik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com>2012-11-27 08:45:00 +0200
committerLuciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>2012-12-05 09:43:33 +0200
commit0e81047996fdde7fc9e8a1c01d532df1f53586fa (patch)
tree5058e4ef6c04c1468de4f6c333ebbb59e702c6e0 /drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
parentwlcore: track FW-allocated packets per link (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-0e81047996fdde7fc9e8a1c01d532df1f53586fa.tar.xz
linux-dev-0e81047996fdde7fc9e8a1c01d532df1f53586fa.zip
wlcore: improved Tx scheduling algorithm
Prioritize EDCA by choosing the AC before anything else. Use the fast/slow link bitmap in FW to improve the scheduling algorithm for the multi-link scenario. Set packet thresholds to determine if a given link is high or low priority according to its speed. A slow link will be given high priority if the amount of packets queued for it in the FW is lower than the slow-threshold. Similarly, a fast link will be given high priority if the number of its packets queued in FW is smaller than the high-threshold. The improved algorithm: 1. Choose optimal AC according to FW utilization 2. Traversing the VIFs in a round-robin fashion, try to choose a high priority link. Links are traversed in a round-robin fashion inside a VIF. 3. If no high priority links are found, choose the first non-empty (low priority) link found in the round robin. Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c124
1 files changed, 90 insertions, 34 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
index 076983b05b4d..fbda3cbca7e7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/tx.c
@@ -467,8 +467,7 @@ void wl1271_handle_tx_low_watermark(struct wl1271 *wl)
}
}
-static struct sk_buff_head *wl1271_select_queue(struct wl1271 *wl,
- struct sk_buff_head *queues)
+static int wlcore_select_ac(struct wl1271 *wl)
{
int i, q = -1, ac;
u32 min_pkts = 0xffffffff;
@@ -482,33 +481,24 @@ static struct sk_buff_head *wl1271_select_queue(struct wl1271 *wl,
*/
for (i = 0; i < NUM_TX_QUEUES; i++) {
ac = wl1271_tx_get_queue(i);
- if (!skb_queue_empty(&queues[ac]) &&
- (wl->tx_allocated_pkts[ac] < min_pkts)) {
+ if (wl->tx_queue_count[ac] &&
+ wl->tx_allocated_pkts[ac] < min_pkts) {
q = ac;
min_pkts = wl->tx_allocated_pkts[q];
}
}
- if (q == -1)
- return NULL;
-
- return &queues[q];
+ return q;
}
-static struct sk_buff *wl12xx_lnk_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl,
- struct wl1271_link *lnk)
+static struct sk_buff *wlcore_lnk_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl,
+ struct wl1271_link *lnk, u8 q)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
unsigned long flags;
- struct sk_buff_head *queue;
- queue = wl1271_select_queue(wl, lnk->tx_queue);
- if (!queue)
- return NULL;
-
- skb = skb_dequeue(queue);
+ skb = skb_dequeue(&lnk->tx_queue[q]);
if (skb) {
- int q = wl1271_tx_get_queue(skb_get_queue_mapping(skb));
spin_lock_irqsave(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
WARN_ON_ONCE(wl->tx_queue_count[q] <= 0);
wl->tx_queue_count[q]--;
@@ -522,9 +512,41 @@ static struct sk_buff *wl12xx_lnk_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl,
return skb;
}
-static struct sk_buff *wl12xx_vif_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl,
- struct wl12xx_vif *wlvif,
- u8 *hlid)
+static bool wlcore_lnk_high_prio(struct wl1271 *wl, u8 hlid,
+ struct wl1271_link *lnk)
+{
+ u8 thold;
+
+ if (test_bit(hlid, (unsigned long *)&wl->fw_fast_lnk_map))
+ thold = wl->conf.tx.fast_link_thold;
+ else
+ thold = wl->conf.tx.slow_link_thold;
+
+ return lnk->allocated_pkts < thold;
+}
+
+static struct sk_buff *wlcore_lnk_dequeue_high_prio(struct wl1271 *wl,
+ u8 hlid, u8 ac,
+ u8 *low_prio_hlid)
+{
+ struct wl1271_link *lnk = &wl->links[hlid];
+
+ if (!wlcore_lnk_high_prio(wl, hlid, lnk)) {
+ if (*low_prio_hlid == WL12XX_INVALID_LINK_ID &&
+ !skb_queue_empty(&lnk->tx_queue[ac]))
+ /* we found the first non-empty low priority queue */
+ *low_prio_hlid = hlid;
+
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return wlcore_lnk_dequeue(wl, lnk, ac);
+}
+
+static struct sk_buff *wlcore_vif_dequeue_high_prio(struct wl1271 *wl,
+ struct wl12xx_vif *wlvif,
+ u8 ac, u8 *hlid,
+ u8 *low_prio_hlid)
{
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
int i, h, start_hlid;
@@ -540,7 +562,8 @@ static struct sk_buff *wl12xx_vif_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl,
if (!test_bit(h, wlvif->links_map))
continue;
- skb = wl12xx_lnk_skb_dequeue(wl, &wl->links[h]);
+ skb = wlcore_lnk_dequeue_high_prio(wl, h, ac,
+ low_prio_hlid);
if (!skb)
continue;
@@ -560,42 +583,74 @@ static struct sk_buff *wl1271_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl, u8 *hlid)
unsigned long flags;
struct wl12xx_vif *wlvif = wl->last_wlvif;
struct sk_buff *skb = NULL;
+ int ac;
+ u8 low_prio_hlid = WL12XX_INVALID_LINK_ID;
+
+ ac = wlcore_select_ac(wl);
+ if (ac < 0)
+ goto out;
/* continue from last wlvif (round robin) */
if (wlvif) {
wl12xx_for_each_wlvif_continue(wl, wlvif) {
- skb = wl12xx_vif_skb_dequeue(wl, wlvif, hlid);
- if (skb) {
- wl->last_wlvif = wlvif;
- break;
- }
+ if (!wlvif->tx_queue_count[ac])
+ continue;
+
+ skb = wlcore_vif_dequeue_high_prio(wl, wlvif, ac, hlid,
+ &low_prio_hlid);
+ if (!skb)
+ continue;
+
+ wl->last_wlvif = wlvif;
+ break;
}
}
/* dequeue from the system HLID before the restarting wlvif list */
if (!skb) {
- skb = wl12xx_lnk_skb_dequeue(wl, &wl->links[wl->system_hlid]);
- *hlid = wl->system_hlid;
+ skb = wlcore_lnk_dequeue_high_prio(wl, wl->system_hlid,
+ ac, &low_prio_hlid);
+ if (skb) {
+ *hlid = wl->system_hlid;
+ wl->last_wlvif = NULL;
+ }
}
- /* do a new pass over the wlvif list */
+ /* Do a new pass over the wlvif list. But no need to continue
+ * after last_wlvif. The previous pass should have found it. */
if (!skb) {
wl12xx_for_each_wlvif(wl, wlvif) {
- skb = wl12xx_vif_skb_dequeue(wl, wlvif, hlid);
+ if (!wlvif->tx_queue_count[ac])
+ goto next;
+
+ skb = wlcore_vif_dequeue_high_prio(wl, wlvif, ac, hlid,
+ &low_prio_hlid);
if (skb) {
wl->last_wlvif = wlvif;
break;
}
- /*
- * No need to continue after last_wlvif. The previous
- * pass should have found it.
- */
+next:
if (wlvif == wl->last_wlvif)
break;
}
}
+ /* no high priority skbs found - but maybe a low priority one? */
+ if (!skb && low_prio_hlid != WL12XX_INVALID_LINK_ID) {
+ struct wl1271_link *lnk = &wl->links[low_prio_hlid];
+ skb = wlcore_lnk_dequeue(wl, lnk, ac);
+
+ WARN_ON(!skb); /* we checked this before */
+ *hlid = low_prio_hlid;
+
+ /* ensure proper round robin in the vif/link levels */
+ wl->last_wlvif = lnk->wlvif;
+ if (lnk->wlvif)
+ lnk->wlvif->last_tx_hlid = low_prio_hlid;
+
+ }
+
if (!skb &&
test_and_clear_bit(WL1271_FLAG_DUMMY_PACKET_PENDING, &wl->flags)) {
int q;
@@ -609,6 +664,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *wl1271_skb_dequeue(struct wl1271 *wl, u8 *hlid)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
}
+out:
return skb;
}