aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>2006-04-03 15:16:48 +0200
committerJames Bottomley <jejb@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>2006-04-14 13:53:43 -0500
commit4186ab1973758190916703eb8889ebe8002c5c8f (patch)
treee25a6c46e49ea9c310f2c7af8698d022fb7a2d4d /drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
parentMerge branch 'for-linus' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-4186ab1973758190916703eb8889ebe8002c5c8f.tar.xz
linux-dev-4186ab1973758190916703eb8889ebe8002c5c8f.zip
[SCSI] Try LUN 1 and use bflags
Some devices report a peripheral qualifier of 3 for LUN 0; with the original code, we would still try a REPORT_LUNS scan (if SCSI level is >= 3 or if we have the BLIST_REPORTLUNS2 passed in), but NOT any sequential scan. Also, the device at LUN 0 (which is not connected according to the PQ) is not registered with the OS. Unfortunately, SANs exist that are SCSI-2 and do NOT support REPORT_LUNS, but report a unknown device with PQ 3 on LUN 0. We still need to scan them, and most probably we even need BLIST_SPARSELUN (and BLIST_LARGELUN). See the bug reference for an infamous example. This is patch 1/3: If we end up in sequential scan, at least try LUN 1 for devices that reported a PQ of 3 for LUN 0. Also return blacklist flags, even for PQ3 devices. Signed-off-by: Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c17
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
index f14945996ede..820c4ad7b581 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c
@@ -872,6 +872,8 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget,
if (scsi_probe_lun(sdev, result, result_len, &bflags))
goto out_free_result;
+ if (bflagsp)
+ *bflagsp = bflags;
/*
* result contains valid SCSI INQUIRY data.
*/
@@ -912,8 +914,6 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget,
sdev->lockable = 0;
scsi_unlock_floptical(sdev, result);
}
- if (bflagsp)
- *bflagsp = bflags;
}
out_free_result:
@@ -938,7 +938,6 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget,
* scsi_sequential_lun_scan - sequentially scan a SCSI target
* @starget: pointer to target structure to scan
* @bflags: black/white list flag for LUN 0
- * @lun0_res: result of scanning LUN 0
*
* Description:
* Generally, scan from LUN 1 (LUN 0 is assumed to already have been
@@ -948,8 +947,7 @@ static int scsi_probe_and_add_lun(struct scsi_target *starget,
* Modifies sdevscan->lun.
**/
static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(struct scsi_target *starget,
- int bflags, int lun0_res, int scsi_level,
- int rescan)
+ int bflags, int scsi_level, int rescan)
{
unsigned int sparse_lun, lun, max_dev_lun;
struct Scsi_Host *shost = dev_to_shost(starget->dev.parent);
@@ -970,13 +968,6 @@ static void scsi_sequential_lun_scan(struct scsi_target *starget,
sparse_lun = 0;
/*
- * If not sparse lun and no device attached at LUN 0 do not scan
- * any further.
- */
- if (!sparse_lun && (lun0_res != SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT))
- return;
-
- /*
* If less than SCSI_1_CSS, and no special lun scaning, stop
* scanning; this matches 2.4 behaviour, but could just be a bug
* (to continue scanning a SCSI_1_CSS device).
@@ -1384,7 +1375,7 @@ static void __scsi_scan_target(struct device *parent, unsigned int channel,
* do a sequential scan.
*/
scsi_sequential_lun_scan(starget, bflags,
- res, starget->scsi_level, rescan);
+ starget->scsi_level, rescan);
}
out_reap: