diff options
| author |   Sven Anderson <sven@anderson.de> | 2005-04-22 15:06:58 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> | 2005-04-22 15:06:58 -0700 |
| commit | 35f4a0c4416b4fd789f94328dc5940e79e1507b0 (patch) | |
| tree | 3e581a7766d64b3c067a11371da7870f0795e0a2 /drivers/usb | |
| parent | [PATCH] USB: compilation failure on usb/image/microtek.c (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-35f4a0c4416b4fd789f94328dc5940e79e1507b0.tar.xz linux-dev-35f4a0c4416b4fd789f94328dc5940e79e1507b0.zip | |
[PATCH] USB: clean up all iPod models in unusual_devs.h
Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> 1. You're adding product IDs 1202, 1203, 1204, and 1205. 1203 was
> already there, but you remove it, OK, but 1205 is already there, so
> you'll need to fix that.
I was not removing 1203, it's just the extension of the bcd range. You are
right about 1205, as I wrote, it was a patch against 2.6.11.7. Attached is
a patch against 2.6.12-rc2.
> 2. I'm OK with the full bcd range if Apple is changing it on firmware
> revs... fine, but it's bcd, not hex... 0x9999 =)
I just copied from other entries. There're a lot 0xffffs in unusual_dev.h,
so I assumed it is correct. I changed it to 0x9999.
> 3. It's rather obnoxious to take the original submitter's credit away.
I didn't remove it, I changed it to "based on...". Because I changed
something (the range) in his entry, I thought it is the best to take the
responsibility but keep the origin. Anyway, in the new patch I did it in a
different way.
> 4. Your /proc/bus/usb/devices shows 1204, but I see no evidence 1202 is
> really an iPod.
I don't have an old iPod mini, but you find a lot of evidence here:
http://www.google.com/search?q=0x1202+ipod
Especially this one:
http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/showdescr.php?id=2737
> It also looks like 1205's entry is getting mangled, but I haven't
> attempted to apply the patch, so I'm not sure.
No, the patch was ok, but I agree it looks strange. It's not very
readable, because I cannot tell diff to work blockwise instead of
linewise. Because of the similarity of the entries, diff splits and merges
them. Anyway, the new patch "looks" better. ;-)
Signed-off-by: Sven Anderson <sven-linux@anderson.de>
Signed-off-by: Phil Dibowitz <phil@ipom.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/usb')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h | 22 |
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h index fa68dea6bc6f..bbda63c24c4d 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h @@ -517,14 +517,32 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x05ab, 0x5701, 0x0100, 0x0110, 0 ), #endif +/* Submitted by Sven Anderson <sven-linux@anderson.de> + * There are at least four ProductIDs used for iPods, so I added 0x1202 and + * 0x1204. They just need the US_FL_FIX_CAPACITY. As the bcdDevice appears + * to change with firmware updates, I changed the range to maximum for all + * iPod entries. + */ +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x05ac, 0x1202, 0x0000, 0x9999, + "Apple", + "iPod", + US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, + US_FL_FIX_CAPACITY ), + /* Reported by Avi Kivity <avi@argo.co.il> */ -UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x05ac, 0x1203, 0x0001, 0x0001, +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x05ac, 0x1203, 0x0000, 0x9999, + "Apple", + "iPod", + US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, + US_FL_FIX_CAPACITY ), + +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x05ac, 0x1204, 0x0000, 0x9999, "Apple", "iPod", US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, US_FL_FIX_CAPACITY ), -UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x05ac, 0x1205, 0x0001, 0x0001, +UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x05ac, 0x1205, 0x0000, 0x9999, "Apple", "iPod", US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, |