drm/i915/guc: Remove hacks for reset and schedule disable G2H being received out of order

In the i915 there are several hacks in place to make request cancellation
work with an old version of the GuC which delivered the G2H indicating
schedule disable is done before G2H indicating a context reset. Version
69 fixes this, so we can remove these hacks.

v2:
 (Checkpatch)
  - s/cancelation/cancellation

Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220113181351.21296-3-matthew.brost@intel.com

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 28 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
index c13f123ae16e..411054f77f33 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
@@ -1532,7 +1532,6 @@ static void __guc_reset_context(struct intel_context *ce, bool stalled)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u32 head;
 	int i, number_children = ce->parallel.number_children;
-	bool skip = false;
 	struct intel_context *parent = ce;
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(ce));
@@ -1543,23 +1542,10 @@ static void __guc_reset_context(struct intel_context *ce, bool stalled)
 	 * GuC will implicitly mark the context as non-schedulable when it sends
 	 * the reset notification. Make sure our state reflects this change. The
 	 * context will be marked enabled on resubmission.
-	 *
-	 * XXX: If the context is reset as a result of the request cancellation
-	 * this G2H is received after the schedule disable complete G2H which is
-	 * wrong as this creates a race between the request cancellation code
-	 * re-submitting the context and this G2H handler. This is a bug in the
-	 * GuC but can be worked around in the meantime but converting this to a
-	 * NOP if a pending enable is in flight as this indicates that a request
-	 * cancellation has occurred.
 	 */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
-	if (likely(!context_pending_enable(ce)))
-		clr_context_enabled(ce);
-	else
-		skip = true;
+	clr_context_enabled(ce);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ce->guc_state.lock, flags);
-	if (unlikely(skip))
-		goto out_put;
 
 	/*
 	 * For each context in the relationship find the hanging request
@@ -1591,7 +1577,6 @@ next_context:
 	}
 
 	__unwind_incomplete_requests(parent);
-out_put:
 	intel_context_put(parent);
 }
 
@@ -2530,12 +2515,6 @@ static void guc_context_cancel_request(struct intel_context *ce,
 					true);
 		}
 
-		/*
-		 * XXX: Racey if context is reset, see comment in
-		 * __guc_reset_context().
-		 */
-		flush_work(&ce_to_guc(ce)->ct.requests.worker);
-
 		guc_context_unblock(block_context);
 		intel_context_put(ce);
 	}
@@ -3970,12 +3949,7 @@ static void guc_handle_context_reset(struct intel_guc *guc,
 {
 	trace_intel_context_reset(ce);
 
-	/*
-	 * XXX: Racey if request cancellation has occurred, see comment in
-	 * __guc_reset_context().
-	 */
-	if (likely(!intel_context_is_banned(ce) &&
-		   !context_blocked(ce))) {
+	if (likely(!intel_context_is_banned(ce))) {
 		capture_error_state(guc, ce);
 		guc_context_replay(ce);
 	} else {