f2fs: fix to avoid data update racing between GC and DIO

Datas in file can be operated by GC and DIO simultaneously, so we will
face race case as below:

For write case:
Thread A				Thread B
- generic_file_direct_write
 - invalidate_inode_pages2_range
 - f2fs_direct_IO
  - do_blockdev_direct_IO
   - do_direct_IO
    - get_more_blocks
					- f2fs_gc
					 - do_garbage_collect
					  - gc_data_segment
					   - move_data_page
					    - do_write_data_page
					    migrate data block to new block address
   - dio_bio_submit
   update user data to old block address

For read case:
Thread A                                Thread B
- generic_file_direct_write
 - invalidate_inode_pages2_range
 - f2fs_direct_IO
  - do_blockdev_direct_IO
   - do_direct_IO
    - get_more_blocks
					- f2fs_balance_fs
					 - f2fs_gc
					  - do_garbage_collect
					   - gc_data_segment
					    - move_data_page
					     - do_write_data_page
					     migrate data block to new block address
					  - write_checkpoint
					   - do_checkpoint
					    - clear_prefree_segments
					     - f2fs_issue_discard
                                             discard old block adress
   - dio_bio_submit
   update user buffer from obsolete block address

In order to fix this, for one file, we should let DIO and GC getting exclusion
against with each other.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 451dfb4041e8..b97c065cbe74 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -579,6 +579,8 @@ static struct inode *f2fs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->gdirty_list);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fi->inmem_pages);
 	mutex_init(&fi->inmem_lock);
+	init_rwsem(&fi->dio_rwsem[READ]);
+	init_rwsem(&fi->dio_rwsem[WRITE]);
 
 	/* Will be used by directory only */
 	fi->i_dir_level = F2FS_SB(sb)->dir_level;