diff options
| author |   Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> | 2015-06-25 12:25:58 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> | 2015-06-30 23:59:49 -0400 |
| commit | 2adc376c551943a07170cbe70f43e6d6065f8906 (patch) | |
| tree | f73e93d10b925e5e0e3a8e47f62a6d58b213da66 /fs/inode.c | |
| parent | namei: make set_root_rcu() return void (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-2adc376c551943a07170cbe70f43e6d6065f8906.tar.xz linux-dev-2adc376c551943a07170cbe70f43e6d6065f8906.zip | |
vfs: avoid creation of inode number 0 in get_next_ino
currently, get_next_ino() is able to create inodes with inode number = 0.
This have a bad impact in the filesystems relying in this function to generate
inode numbers.
While there is no problem at all in having inodes with number 0, userspace tools
which handle file management tasks can have problems handling these files, like
for example, the impossiblity of users to delete these files, since glibc will
ignore them. So, I believe the best way is kernel to avoid creating them.
This problem has been raised previously, but the old thread didn't have any
other update for a year+, and I've seen too many users hitting the same issue
regarding the impossibility to delete files while using filesystems relying on
this function. So, I'm starting the thread again, with the same patch
that I believe is enough to address this problem.
Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/inode.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/inode.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index 0401d2c6d087..648e71ce6ec2 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -840,7 +840,11 @@ unsigned int get_next_ino(void) } #endif - *p = ++res; + res++; + /* get_next_ino should not provide a 0 inode number */ + if (unlikely(!res)) + res++; + *p = res; put_cpu_var(last_ino); return res; } |