aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorchai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>2014-10-09 15:25:17 -0700
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2014-10-09 22:25:48 -0400
commitb1a8de1f534337b398c7778578a56ec4f018cb27 (patch)
treef703ad9492c640ee415e156506767778c88e3026 /fs/proc/task_mmu.c
parentocfs2: fix deadlock due to wrong locking order (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-b1a8de1f534337b398c7778578a56ec4f018cb27.tar.xz
linux-dev-b1a8de1f534337b398c7778578a56ec4f018cb27.zip
softlockup: make detector be aware of task switch of processes hogging cpu
For now, soft lockup detector warns once for each case of process softlockup. But the thread 'watchdog/n' may not always get the cpu at the time slot between the task switch of two processes hogging that cpu to reset soft_watchdog_warn. An example would be two processes hogging the cpu. Process A causes the softlockup warning and is killed manually by a user. Process B immediately becomes the new process hogging the cpu preventing the softlockup code from resetting the soft_watchdog_warn variable. This case is a false negative of "warn only once for a process", as there may be a different process that is going to hog the cpu. Resolve this by saving/checking the task pointer of the hogging process and use that to reset soft_watchdog_warn too. [dzickus@redhat.com: update comment] Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/proc/task_mmu.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions