aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>2019-12-05 19:39:07 +0800
committerDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>2019-12-13 14:10:46 +0100
commitfbd542971aa1e9ec33212afe1d9b4f1106cd85a1 (patch)
tree689eff8f76a7e2a27e0e59235bdd890005f65208 /fs
parentbtrfs: do not leak reloc root if we fail to read the fs root (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-fbd542971aa1e9ec33212afe1d9b4f1106cd85a1.tar.xz
linux-dev-fbd542971aa1e9ec33212afe1d9b4f1106cd85a1.zip
btrfs: send: remove WARN_ON for readonly mount
We log warning if root::orphan_cleanup_state is not set to ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE in btrfs_ioctl_send(). However if the filesystem is mounted as readonly we skip the orphan item cleanup during the lookup and root::orphan_cleanup_state remains at the init state 0 instead of ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE (2). So during send in btrfs_ioctl_send() we hit the warning as below. WARN_ON(send_root->orphan_cleanup_state != ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE); WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2616 at /Volumes/ws/btrfs-devel/fs/btrfs/send.c:7090 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xb2f/0x18c0 [btrfs] :: RIP: 0010:btrfs_ioctl_send+0xb2f/0x18c0 [btrfs] :: Call Trace: :: _btrfs_ioctl_send+0x7b/0x110 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x150a/0x2b00 [btrfs] :: do_vfs_ioctl+0xa9/0x620 ? __fget+0xac/0xe0 ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x49/0x130 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Reproducer: mkfs.btrfs -fq /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs subvolume create /btrfs/sv1 btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /btrfs/sv1 /btrfs/ss1 umount /btrfs mount -o ro /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs send /btrfs/ss1 -f /tmp/f The warning exists because having orphan inodes could confuse send and cause it to fail or produce incorrect streams. The two cases that would cause such send failures, which are already fixed are: 1) Inodes that were unlinked - these are orphanized and remain with a link count of 0. These caused send operations to fail because it expected to always find at least one path for an inode. However this is no longer a problem since send is now able to deal with such inodes since commit 46b2f4590aab ("Btrfs: fix send failure when root has deleted files still open") and treats them as having been completely removed (the state after an orphan cleanup is performed). 2) Inodes that were in the process of being truncated. These resulted in send not knowing about the truncation and potentially issue write operations full of zeroes for the range from the new file size to the old file size. This is no longer a problem because we no longer create orphan items for truncation since commit f7e9e8fc792f ("Btrfs: stop creating orphan items for truncate"). As such before these commits, the WARN_ON here provided a clue in case something went wrong. Instead of being a warning against the root::orphan_cleanup_state value, it could have been more accurate by checking if there were actually any orphan items, and then issue a warning only if any exists, but that would be more expensive to check. Since orphanized inodes no longer cause problems for send, just remove the warning. Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/21cb5e8d059f6e1496a903fa7bfc0a297e2f5370.camel@scientia.net/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Suggested-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs')
-rw-r--r--fs/btrfs/send.c6
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c
index ae2db5eb1549..091e5bc8c7ea 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/send.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c
@@ -7084,12 +7084,6 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_send(struct file *mnt_file, struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args *arg)
spin_unlock(&send_root->root_item_lock);
/*
- * This is done when we lookup the root, it should already be complete
- * by the time we get here.
- */
- WARN_ON(send_root->orphan_cleanup_state != ORPHAN_CLEANUP_DONE);
-
- /*
* Userspace tools do the checks and warn the user if it's
* not RO.
*/