diff options
| author |   Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> | 2018-09-18 16:34:34 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> | 2018-09-24 10:54:01 +0200 |
| commit | a725356b6659469d182d662f22d770d83d3bc7b5 (patch) | |
| tree | 717a1d93d07997e95ca0d2cead500e5b01c8caea /include/linux/fs.h | |
| parent | ovl: fix freeze protection bypass in ovl_clone_file_range() (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-a725356b6659469d182d662f22d770d83d3bc7b5.tar.xz linux-dev-a725356b6659469d182d662f22d770d83d3bc7b5.zip | |
vfs: swap names of {do,vfs}_clone_file_range()
Commit 031a072a0b8a ("vfs: call vfs_clone_file_range() under freeze
protection") created a wrapper do_clone_file_range() around
vfs_clone_file_range() moving the freeze protection to former, so
overlayfs could call the latter.
The more common vfs practice is to call do_xxx helpers from vfs_xxx
helpers, where freeze protecction is taken in the vfs_xxx helper, so
this anomality could be a source of confusion.
It seems that commit 8ede205541ff ("ovl: add reflink/copyfile/dedup
support") may have fallen a victim to this confusion -
ovl_clone_file_range() calls the vfs_clone_file_range() helper in the
hope of getting freeze protection on upper fs, but in fact results in
overlayfs allowing to bypass upper fs freeze protection.
Swap the names of the two helpers to conform to common vfs practice
and call the correct helpers from overlayfs and nfsd.
Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/linux/fs.h')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/fs.h | 17 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 6c0b4a1c22ff..897eae8faee1 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -1828,8 +1828,10 @@ extern ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *, loff_t , struct file *, extern int vfs_clone_file_prep_inodes(struct inode *inode_in, loff_t pos_in, struct inode *inode_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 *len, bool is_dedupe); +extern int do_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len); extern int vfs_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, - struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len); + struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, u64 len); extern int vfs_dedupe_file_range_compare(struct inode *src, loff_t srcoff, struct inode *dest, loff_t destoff, loff_t len, bool *is_same); @@ -2773,19 +2775,6 @@ static inline void file_end_write(struct file *file) __sb_end_write(file_inode(file)->i_sb, SB_FREEZE_WRITE); } -static inline int do_clone_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in, - struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out, - u64 len) -{ - int ret; - - file_start_write(file_out); - ret = vfs_clone_file_range(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, len); - file_end_write(file_out); - - return ret; -} - /* * get_write_access() gets write permission for a file. * put_write_access() releases this write permission. |