memblock: rename memblock_free to memblock_phys_free

Since memblock_free() operates on a physical range, make its name
reflect it and rename it to memblock_phys_free(), so it will be a
logical counterpart to memblock_phys_alloc().

The callers are updated with the below semantic patch:

    @@
    expression addr;
    expression size;
    @@
    - memblock_free(addr, size);
    + memblock_phys_free(addr, size);

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210930185031.18648-6-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Shahab Vahedi <Shahab.Vahedi@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index e25f964fdd60..d32d41709513 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ void memblock_allow_resize(void);
 int memblock_add_node(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, int nid);
 int memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
 int memblock_remove(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
-int memblock_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
+int memblock_phys_free(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
 int memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_PHYS_MAP
 int memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);