diff options
| author |   Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> | 2018-02-05 14:16:06 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2018-02-15 01:15:51 +0100 |
| commit | 8fa80c503b484ddc1abbd10c7cb2ab81f3824a50 (patch) | |
| tree | b5b1d8d3cfbb754ca59916900ba1ce50d993a8a2 /include | |
| parent | x86/speculation: Fix up array_index_nospec_mask() asm constraint (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-8fa80c503b484ddc1abbd10c7cb2ab81f3824a50.tar.xz linux-dev-8fa80c503b484ddc1abbd10c7cb2ab81f3824a50.zip | |
nospec: Move array_index_nospec() parameter checking into separate macro
For architectures providing their own implementation of
array_index_mask_nospec() in asm/barrier.h, attempting to use WARN_ONCE() to
complain about out-of-range parameters using WARN_ON() results in a mess
of mutually-dependent include files.
Rather than unpick the dependencies, simply have the core code in nospec.h
perform the checking for us.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1517840166-15399-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/nospec.h | 36 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/nospec.h b/include/linux/nospec.h index b99bced39ac2..fbc98e2c8228 100644 --- a/include/linux/nospec.h +++ b/include/linux/nospec.h @@ -20,20 +20,6 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index, unsigned long size) { /* - * Warn developers about inappropriate array_index_nospec() usage. - * - * Even if the CPU speculates past the WARN_ONCE branch, the - * sign bit of @index is taken into account when generating the - * mask. - * - * This warning is compiled out when the compiler can infer that - * @index and @size are less than LONG_MAX. - */ - if (WARN_ONCE(index > LONG_MAX || size > LONG_MAX, - "array_index_nospec() limited to range of [0, LONG_MAX]\n")) - return 0; - - /* * Always calculate and emit the mask even if the compiler * thinks the mask is not needed. The compiler does not take * into account the value of @index under speculation. @@ -44,6 +30,26 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index, #endif /* + * Warn developers about inappropriate array_index_nospec() usage. + * + * Even if the CPU speculates past the WARN_ONCE branch, the + * sign bit of @index is taken into account when generating the + * mask. + * + * This warning is compiled out when the compiler can infer that + * @index and @size are less than LONG_MAX. + */ +#define array_index_mask_nospec_check(index, size) \ +({ \ + if (WARN_ONCE(index > LONG_MAX || size > LONG_MAX, \ + "array_index_nospec() limited to range of [0, LONG_MAX]\n")) \ + _mask = 0; \ + else \ + _mask = array_index_mask_nospec(index, size); \ + _mask; \ +}) + +/* * array_index_nospec - sanitize an array index after a bounds check * * For a code sequence like: @@ -61,7 +67,7 @@ static inline unsigned long array_index_mask_nospec(unsigned long index, ({ \ typeof(index) _i = (index); \ typeof(size) _s = (size); \ - unsigned long _mask = array_index_mask_nospec(_i, _s); \ + unsigned long _mask = array_index_mask_nospec_check(_i, _s); \ \ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_i) > sizeof(long)); \ BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(_s) > sizeof(long)); \ |