net: lwtunnel: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/include/net/lwtunnel.h b/include/net/lwtunnel.h
index 5d6c5b1fc695..b5e6edf74b70 100644
--- a/include/net/lwtunnel.h
+++ b/include/net/lwtunnel.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ struct lwtunnel_state {
 	int		(*orig_output)(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
 	int		(*orig_input)(struct sk_buff *);
 	struct		rcu_head rcu;
-	__u8            data[0];
+	__u8            data[];
 };
 
 struct lwtunnel_encap_ops {