diff options
| author |   Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com> | 2018-07-31 18:17:22 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2018-07-31 22:09:33 +0200 |
| commit | fbeb1603bf4e9baa82da8f794de42949d0fe5e25 (patch) | |
| tree | 18cda999382d4e19ab89c30221ffeafed8b26baa /kernel/bpf/verifier.c | |
| parent | selftests/bpf: Test for get_socket_cookie (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-fbeb1603bf4e9baa82da8f794de42949d0fe5e25.tar.xz linux-dev-fbeb1603bf4e9baa82da8f794de42949d0fe5e25.zip | |
bpf: verifier: MOV64 don't mark dst reg unbounded
When check_alu_op() handles a BPF_MOV64 between two registers,
it calls check_reg_arg(DST_OP) on the dst register, marking it
as unbounded. If the src and dst register are the same, this
marks the src as unbounded, which can lead to unexpected errors
for further checks that rely on bounds info. For example:
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0),
BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2),
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
Results in:
"math between ctx pointer and register with unbounded
min value is not allowed"
check_alu_op() now uses check_reg_arg(DST_OP_NO_MARK), and MOVs
that need to mark the dst register (MOVIMM, MOV32) do so.
Added a test case for MOV64 dst == src, and dst != src.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 25e47c195874..e948303a0ea8 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -3238,8 +3238,8 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } } - /* check dest operand */ - err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP); + /* check dest operand, mark as required later */ + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->dst_reg, DST_OP_NO_MARK); if (err) return err; @@ -3265,6 +3265,8 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) /* case: R = imm * remember the value we stored into this reg */ + /* clear any state __mark_reg_known doesn't set */ + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg); regs[insn->dst_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE; if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) { __mark_reg_known(regs + insn->dst_reg, |