diff options
| author |   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> | 2021-10-22 16:50:56 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> | 2021-10-22 16:53:38 -0700 |
| commit | a33f607f6802374672067d947209b542d12f4dac (patch) | |
| tree | 45b59b46b71617dd979eb7436896159033c72e35 /kernel/bpf | |
| parent | bpftool: Avoid leaking the JSON writer prepared for program metadata (diff) | |
| parent | selftests/bpf: Fix flow dissector tests (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-a33f607f6802374672067d947209b542d12f4dac.tar.xz linux-dev-a33f607f6802374672067d947209b542d12f4dac.zip | |
Merge branch 'libbpf: use func name when pinning programs with LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME'
Stanislav Fomichev says:
====================
Commit 15669e1dcd75 ("selftests/bpf: Normalize all the rest SEC() uses")
broke flow dissector tests. With the strict section names, bpftool isn't
able to pin all programs of the objects (all section names are the
same now). To bring it back to life let's do the following:
- teach libbpf to pin by func name with LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME
- enable strict mode in bpftool (breaking cli change)
- fix custom flow_dissector loader to use strict mode
- fix flow_dissector tests to use new pin names (func vs sec)
v5:
- get rid of error when retrying with '/' (Quentin Monnet)
v4:
- fix comment spelling (Quentin Monnet)
- retry progtype without / (Quentin Monnet)
v3:
- clarify program pinning in LIBBPF_STRICT_SEC_NAME,
for real this time (Andrii Nakryiko)
- fix possible segfault in __bpf_program__pin_name (Andrii Nakryiko)
v2:
- add github issue (Andrii Nakryiko)
- remove sec_name from bpf_program.pin_name comment (Andrii Nakryiko)
- add cover letter (Andrii Nakryiko)
====================
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/bpf')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions