Merge tag 'v5.0-rc7' into patchwork

Linux 5.0-rc7

* tag 'v5.0-rc7': (1667 commits)
  Linux 5.0-rc7
  Input: elan_i2c - add ACPI ID for touchpad in Lenovo V330-15ISK
  Input: st-keyscan - fix potential zalloc NULL dereference
  Input: apanel - switch to using brightness_set_blocking()
  powerpc/64s: Fix possible corruption on big endian due to pgd/pud_present()
  efi/arm: Revert "Defer persistent reservations until after paging_init()"
  arm64, mm, efi: Account for GICv3 LPI tables in static memblock reserve table
  sunrpc: fix 4 more call sites that were using stack memory with a scatterlist
  include/linux/module.h: copy __init/__exit attrs to init/cleanup_module
  Compiler Attributes: add support for __copy (gcc >= 9)
  lib/crc32.c: mark crc32_le_base/__crc32c_le_base aliases as __pure
  auxdisplay: ht16k33: fix potential user-after-free on module unload
  x86/platform/UV: Use efi_runtime_lock to serialise BIOS calls
  i2c: bcm2835: Clear current buffer pointers and counts after a transfer
  i2c: cadence: Fix the hold bit setting
  drm: Use array_size() when creating lease
  dm thin: fix bug where bio that overwrites thin block ignores FUA
  Revert "exec: load_script: don't blindly truncate shebang string"
  Revert "gfs2: read journal in large chunks to locate the head"
  net: ethernet: freescale: set FEC ethtool regs version
  ...

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 17 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index be3bff2315ff..a0514e01c3eb 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1452,11 +1452,7 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
 	if (WARN(q->pi_state || q->rt_waiter, "refusing to wake PI futex\n"))
 		return;
 
-	/*
-	 * Queue the task for later wakeup for after we've released
-	 * the hb->lock. wake_q_add() grabs reference to p.
-	 */
-	wake_q_add(wake_q, p);
+	get_task_struct(p);
 	__unqueue_futex(q);
 	/*
 	 * The waiting task can free the futex_q as soon as q->lock_ptr = NULL
@@ -1466,6 +1462,13 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
 	 * plist_del in __unqueue_futex().
 	 */
 	smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
+
+	/*
+	 * Queue the task for later wakeup for after we've released
+	 * the hb->lock. wake_q_add() grabs reference to p.
+	 */
+	wake_q_add(wake_q, p);
+	put_task_struct(p);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2218,11 +2221,11 @@ static inline struct futex_hash_bucket *queue_lock(struct futex_q *q)
 	 * decrement the counter at queue_unlock() when some error has
 	 * occurred and we don't end up adding the task to the list.
 	 */
-	hb_waiters_inc(hb);
+	hb_waiters_inc(hb); /* implies smp_mb(); (A) */
 
 	q->lock_ptr = &hb->lock;
 
-	spin_lock(&hb->lock); /* implies smp_mb(); (A) */
+	spin_lock(&hb->lock);
 	return hb;
 }
 
@@ -2858,35 +2861,39 @@ retry_private:
 	 * and BUG when futex_unlock_pi() interleaves with this.
 	 *
 	 * Therefore acquire wait_lock while holding hb->lock, but drop the
-	 * latter before calling rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). This still fully
-	 * serializes against futex_unlock_pi() as that does the exact same
-	 * lock handoff sequence.
+	 * latter before calling __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(). This
+	 * interleaves with futex_unlock_pi() -- which does a similar lock
+	 * handoff -- such that the latter can observe the futex_q::pi_state
+	 * before __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() is done.
 	 */
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
 	spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr);
+	/*
+	 * __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() unconditionally enqueues the @rt_waiter
+	 * such that futex_unlock_pi() is guaranteed to observe the waiter when
+	 * it sees the futex_q::pi_state.
+	 */
 	ret = __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, &rt_waiter, current);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
 
 	if (ret) {
 		if (ret == 1)
 			ret = 0;
-
-		spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
-		goto no_block;
+		goto cleanup;
 	}
 
-
 	if (unlikely(to))
 		hrtimer_start_expires(&to->timer, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);
 
 	ret = rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(&q.pi_state->pi_mutex, to, &rt_waiter);
 
+cleanup:
 	spin_lock(q.lock_ptr);
 	/*
-	 * If we failed to acquire the lock (signal/timeout), we must
+	 * If we failed to acquire the lock (deadlock/signal/timeout), we must
 	 * first acquire the hb->lock before removing the lock from the
-	 * rt_mutex waitqueue, such that we can keep the hb and rt_mutex
-	 * wait lists consistent.
+	 * rt_mutex waitqueue, such that we can keep the hb and rt_mutex wait
+	 * lists consistent.
 	 *
 	 * In particular; it is important that futex_unlock_pi() can not
 	 * observe this inconsistency.
@@ -3010,6 +3017,10 @@ retry:
 		 * there is no point where we hold neither; and therefore
 		 * wake_futex_pi() must observe a state consistent with what we
 		 * observed.
+		 *
+		 * In particular; this forces __rt_mutex_start_proxy() to
+		 * complete such that we're guaranteed to observe the
+		 * rt_waiter. Also see the WARN in wake_futex_pi().
 		 */
 		raw_spin_lock_irq(&pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock);
 		spin_unlock(&hb->lock);