diff options
author | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> | 2008-12-20 04:54:54 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> | 2008-12-20 04:54:54 -0500 |
commit | 93b8eef1c098efbea2f1fc0be7e3c681f259a7e7 (patch) | |
tree | 462cc8c2bc07bbc825dab2a200891a28d8643329 /kernel/time | |
parent | Input: libps2 - handle 0xfc responses from devices (diff) | |
parent | Linux 2.6.28-rc9 (diff) | |
download | linux-dev-93b8eef1c098efbea2f1fc0be7e3c681f259a7e7.tar.xz linux-dev-93b8eef1c098efbea2f1fc0be7e3c681f259a7e7.zip |
Merge commit 'v2.6.28-rc9' into next
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/time')
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 22 |
2 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c index 5bbb1044f847..342fc9ccab46 100644 --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c @@ -568,6 +568,9 @@ static void tick_nohz_switch_to_nohz(void) */ static void tick_nohz_kick_tick(int cpu) { +#if 0 + /* Switch back to 2.6.27 behaviour */ + struct tick_sched *ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu); ktime_t delta, now; @@ -584,6 +587,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_kick_tick(int cpu) return; tick_nohz_restart(ts, now); +#endif } #else diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c index e7acfb482a68..fa05e88aa76f 100644 --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -518,6 +518,28 @@ void update_wall_time(void) /* correct the clock when NTP error is too big */ clocksource_adjust(offset); + /* + * Since in the loop above, we accumulate any amount of time + * in xtime_nsec over a second into xtime.tv_sec, its possible for + * xtime_nsec to be fairly small after the loop. Further, if we're + * slightly speeding the clocksource up in clocksource_adjust(), + * its possible the required corrective factor to xtime_nsec could + * cause it to underflow. + * + * Now, we cannot simply roll the accumulated second back, since + * the NTP subsystem has been notified via second_overflow. So + * instead we push xtime_nsec forward by the amount we underflowed, + * and add that amount into the error. + * + * We'll correct this error next time through this function, when + * xtime_nsec is not as small. + */ + if (unlikely((s64)clock->xtime_nsec < 0)) { + s64 neg = -(s64)clock->xtime_nsec; + clock->xtime_nsec = 0; + clock->error += neg << (NTP_SCALE_SHIFT - clock->shift); + } + /* store full nanoseconds into xtime after rounding it up and * add the remainder to the error difference. */ |