diff options
| author |   Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> | 2018-07-11 09:29:48 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2018-07-15 23:47:33 +0200 |
| commit | e117cb52bdb4d376b711bee34af6434c9e314b3b (patch) | |
| tree | d8914f36c1f5ec0d2a139ae456d287fba8c887cb /kernel | |
| parent | stop_machine: Disable preemption when waking two stopper threads (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-e117cb52bdb4d376b711bee34af6434c9e314b3b.tar.xz linux-dev-e117cb52bdb4d376b711bee34af6434c9e314b3b.zip | |
sched/deadline: Fix switched_from_dl() warning
Mark noticed that syzkaller is able to reliably trigger the following warning:
dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 153 at kernel/sched/deadline.c:124 switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608
Kernel panic - not syncing: panic_on_warn set ...
CPU: 1 PID: 153 Comm: syz-executor253 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc3+ #29
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x458
show_stack+0x20/0x30
dump_stack+0x180/0x250
panic+0x2dc/0x4ec
__warn_printk+0x0/0x150
report_bug+0x228/0x2d8
bug_handler+0xa0/0x1a0
brk_handler+0x2f0/0x568
do_debug_exception+0x1bc/0x5d0
el1_dbg+0x18/0x78
switched_from_dl+0x454/0x608
__sched_setscheduler+0x8cc/0x2018
sys_sched_setattr+0x340/0x758
el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34
syzkaller reproducer runs a bunch of threads that constantly switch
between DEADLINE and NORMAL classes while interacting through futexes.
The splat above is caused by the fact that if a DEADLINE task is setattr
back to NORMAL while in non_contending state (blocked on a futex -
inactive timer armed), its contribution to running_bw is not removed
before sub_rq_bw() gets called (!task_on_rq_queued() branch) and the
latter sees running_bw > this_bw.
Fix it by removing a task contribution from running_bw if the task is
not queued and in non_contending state while switched to a different
class.
Reported-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: claudio@evidence.eu.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180711072948.27061-1-juri.lelli@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/deadline.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c index fbfc3f1d368a..10c7b51c0d1f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c @@ -2290,8 +2290,17 @@ static void switched_from_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) if (task_on_rq_queued(p) && p->dl.dl_runtime) task_non_contending(p); - if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) + if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) { + /* + * Inactive timer is armed. However, p is leaving DEADLINE and + * might migrate away from this rq while continuing to run on + * some other class. We need to remove its contribution from + * this rq running_bw now, or sub_rq_bw (below) will complain. + */ + if (p->dl.dl_non_contending) + sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl); sub_rq_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl); + } /* * We cannot use inactive_task_timer() to invoke sub_running_bw() |