diff options
| author |   Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> | 2021-09-14 11:18:41 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2021-09-28 09:26:29 +0200 |
| commit | 18935a72eb25525b655262579e1652362a3b29bb (patch) | |
| tree | 9e38f0d1d556c0f493d301ef01c564f393f61d3a /lib/test_bpf.c | |
| parent | bpf/tests: Add more BPF_END byte order conversion tests (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-18935a72eb25525b655262579e1652362a3b29bb.tar.xz linux-dev-18935a72eb25525b655262579e1652362a3b29bb.zip | |
bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests
This patch fixes an error in the tail call limit test that caused the
test to fail on for x86-64 JIT. Previously, the register R0 was used to
report the total number of tail calls made. However, after a tail call
fall-through, the value of the R0 register is undefined. Now, all tail
call error path tests instead use context state to store the count.
Fixes: 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite")
Reported-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io>
Reported-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-14-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/test_bpf.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/test_bpf.c | 37 |
1 files changed, 27 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/lib/test_bpf.c b/lib/test_bpf.c index 7f8ad4fa4add..a94ab634f947 100644 --- a/lib/test_bpf.c +++ b/lib/test_bpf.c @@ -12180,10 +12180,15 @@ static __init int test_bpf(void) struct tail_call_test { const char *descr; struct bpf_insn insns[MAX_INSNS]; + int flags; int result; int stack_depth; }; +/* Flags that can be passed to tail call test cases */ +#define FLAG_NEED_STATE BIT(0) +#define FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE BIT(1) + /* * Magic marker used in test snippets for tail calls below. * BPF_LD/MOV to R2 and R2 with this immediate value is replaced @@ -12253,32 +12258,38 @@ static struct tail_call_test tail_call_tests[] = { { "Tail call error path, max count reached", .insns = { - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, R1, 1), - BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, R0, R1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, R2, R1, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, R2, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, R1, R2, 0), TAIL_CALL(0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1, + .flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE, + .result = (MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT + 1 + 1) * MAX_TESTRUNS, }, { "Tail call error path, NULL target", .insns = { - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, -1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, R2, R1, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, R2, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, R1, R2, 0), TAIL_CALL(TAIL_CALL_NULL), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = 1, + .flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE, + .result = MAX_TESTRUNS, }, { "Tail call error path, index out of range", .insns = { - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, -1), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, R2, R1, 0), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, R2, 1), + BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, R1, R2, 0), TAIL_CALL(TAIL_CALL_INVALID), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, R0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .result = 1, + .flags = FLAG_NEED_STATE | FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE, + .result = MAX_TESTRUNS, }, }; @@ -12384,6 +12395,8 @@ static __init int test_tail_calls(struct bpf_array *progs) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tail_call_tests); i++) { struct tail_call_test *test = &tail_call_tests[i]; struct bpf_prog *fp = progs->ptrs[i]; + int *data = NULL; + int state = 0; u64 duration; int ret; @@ -12400,7 +12413,11 @@ static __init int test_tail_calls(struct bpf_array *progs) if (fp->jited) jit_cnt++; - ret = __run_one(fp, NULL, MAX_TESTRUNS, &duration); + if (test->flags & FLAG_NEED_STATE) + data = &state; + ret = __run_one(fp, data, MAX_TESTRUNS, &duration); + if (test->flags & FLAG_RESULT_IN_STATE) + ret = state; if (ret == test->result) { pr_cont("%lld PASS", duration); pass_cnt++; |