aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorThomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>2015-02-06 16:08:43 +0000
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2015-02-06 15:19:17 -0800
commit020219a69d40a205dad12b0ea1e6a46153793368 (patch)
tree0dec904a1fcc46dc6758c673afda340bf1da4475 /lib
parentMerge branch 'rhashtable-next' (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-020219a69d40a205dad12b0ea1e6a46153793368.tar.xz
linux-dev-020219a69d40a205dad12b0ea1e6a46153793368.zip
rhashtable: Fix remove logic to avoid cross references between buckets
The remove logic properly searched the remaining chain for a matching entry with an identical hash but it did this while searching from both the old and new table. Instead in order to not leave stale references behind we need to: 1. When growing and searching from the new table: Search remaining chain for entry with same hash to avoid having the new table directly point to a entry with a different hash. 2. When shrinking and searching from the old table: Check if the element after the removed would create a cross reference and avoid it if so. These bugs were present from the beginning in nft_hash. Also, both insert functions calculated the hash based on the mask of the new table. This worked while growing. Wwhile shrinking, the mask of the inew table is smaller than the mask of the old table. This lead to a bit not being taken into account when selecting the bucket lock and thus caused the wrong bucket to be locked eventually. Fixes: 7e1e77636e36 ("lib: Resizable, Scalable, Concurrent Hash Table") Fixes: 97defe1ecf86 ("rhashtable: Per bucket locks & deferred expansion/shrinking") Reported-by: Ying Xue <ying.xue@windriver.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/rhashtable.c28
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/lib/rhashtable.c b/lib/rhashtable.c
index 5919d63f58e4..e96fc00208bc 100644
--- a/lib/rhashtable.c
+++ b/lib/rhashtable.c
@@ -552,8 +552,10 @@ static void rhashtable_wakeup_worker(struct rhashtable *ht)
static void __rhashtable_insert(struct rhashtable *ht, struct rhash_head *obj,
struct bucket_table *tbl, u32 hash)
{
- struct rhash_head *head = rht_dereference_bucket(tbl->buckets[hash],
- tbl, hash);
+ struct rhash_head *head;
+
+ hash = rht_bucket_index(tbl, hash);
+ head = rht_dereference_bucket(tbl->buckets[hash], tbl, hash);
ASSERT_BUCKET_LOCK(ht, tbl, hash);
@@ -593,7 +595,7 @@ void rhashtable_insert(struct rhashtable *ht, struct rhash_head *obj)
tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(ht->future_tbl, ht);
old_tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(ht->tbl, ht);
- hash = head_hashfn(ht, tbl, obj);
+ hash = obj_raw_hashfn(ht, rht_obj(ht, obj));
lock_buckets(tbl, old_tbl, hash);
__rhashtable_insert(ht, obj, tbl, hash);
@@ -627,8 +629,8 @@ bool rhashtable_remove(struct rhashtable *ht, struct rhash_head *obj)
bool ret = false;
rcu_read_lock();
- tbl = old_tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(ht->tbl, ht);
- new_tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(ht->future_tbl, ht);
+ old_tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(ht->tbl, ht);
+ tbl = new_tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(ht->future_tbl, ht);
new_hash = obj_raw_hashfn(ht, rht_obj(ht, obj));
lock_buckets(new_tbl, old_tbl, new_hash);
@@ -643,15 +645,19 @@ restart:
ASSERT_BUCKET_LOCK(ht, tbl, hash);
- if (unlikely(new_tbl != tbl)) {
- rht_for_each_continue(he2, he->next, tbl, hash) {
+ if (old_tbl->size > new_tbl->size && tbl == old_tbl &&
+ !rht_is_a_nulls(obj->next) &&
+ head_hashfn(ht, tbl, obj->next) != hash) {
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, (struct rhash_head *) rht_marker(ht, hash));
+ } else if (unlikely(old_tbl->size < new_tbl->size && tbl == new_tbl)) {
+ rht_for_each_continue(he2, obj->next, tbl, hash) {
if (head_hashfn(ht, tbl, he2) == hash) {
rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, he2);
goto found;
}
}
- INIT_RHT_NULLS_HEAD(*pprev, ht, hash);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, (struct rhash_head *) rht_marker(ht, hash));
} else {
rcu_assign_pointer(*pprev, obj->next);
}
@@ -666,8 +672,8 @@ found:
* resizing. Thus traversing both is fine and the added cost is
* very rare.
*/
- if (tbl != new_tbl) {
- tbl = new_tbl;
+ if (tbl != old_tbl) {
+ tbl = old_tbl;
goto restart;
}
@@ -835,7 +841,7 @@ bool rhashtable_lookup_compare_insert(struct rhashtable *ht,
rcu_read_lock();
old_tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(ht->tbl, ht);
new_tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(ht->future_tbl, ht);
- new_hash = head_hashfn(ht, new_tbl, obj);
+ new_hash = obj_raw_hashfn(ht, rht_obj(ht, obj));
lock_buckets(new_tbl, old_tbl, new_hash);