Merge branch 'for-linus' into for-next

Back-merge to apply the tasklet conversion patches that are based
on the already applied tasklet API changes on 5.9-rc4.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 31 deletions

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 78c84bee7e29..2ccff8472cd4 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -303,24 +303,6 @@ static ssize_t hpage_pmd_size_show(struct kobject *kobj,
 static struct kobj_attribute hpage_pmd_size_attr =
 	__ATTR_RO(hpage_pmd_size);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
-static ssize_t debug_cow_show(struct kobject *kobj,
-				struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
-{
-	return single_hugepage_flag_show(kobj, attr, buf,
-				TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEBUG_COW_FLAG);
-}
-static ssize_t debug_cow_store(struct kobject *kobj,
-			       struct kobj_attribute *attr,
-			       const char *buf, size_t count)
-{
-	return single_hugepage_flag_store(kobj, attr, buf, count,
-				 TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEBUG_COW_FLAG);
-}
-static struct kobj_attribute debug_cow_attr =
-	__ATTR(debug_cow, 0644, debug_cow_show, debug_cow_store);
-#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_VM */
-
 static struct attribute *hugepage_attr[] = {
 	&enabled_attr.attr,
 	&defrag_attr.attr,
@@ -329,9 +311,6 @@ static struct attribute *hugepage_attr[] = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SHMEM
 	&shmem_enabled_attr.attr,
 #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
-	&debug_cow_attr.attr,
-#endif
 	NULL,
 };
 
@@ -640,7 +619,7 @@ static vm_fault_t __do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page(struct vm_fault *vmf,
 		entry = mk_huge_pmd(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
 		entry = maybe_pmd_mkwrite(pmd_mkdirty(entry), vma);
 		page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, haddr, true);
-		lru_cache_add_active_or_unevictable(page, vma);
+		lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable(page, vma);
 		pgtable_trans_huge_deposit(vma->vm_mm, vmf->pmd, pgtable);
 		set_pmd_at(vma->vm_mm, haddr, vmf->pmd, entry);
 		add_mm_counter(vma->vm_mm, MM_ANONPAGES, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
@@ -1722,19 +1701,13 @@ static pmd_t move_soft_dirty_pmd(pmd_t pmd)
 }
 
 bool move_huge_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long old_addr,
-		  unsigned long new_addr, unsigned long old_end,
-		  pmd_t *old_pmd, pmd_t *new_pmd)
+		  unsigned long new_addr, pmd_t *old_pmd, pmd_t *new_pmd)
 {
 	spinlock_t *old_ptl, *new_ptl;
 	pmd_t pmd;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
 	bool force_flush = false;
 
-	if ((old_addr & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK) ||
-	    (new_addr & ~HPAGE_PMD_MASK) ||
-	    old_end - old_addr < HPAGE_PMD_SIZE)
-		return false;
-
 	/*
 	 * The destination pmd shouldn't be established, free_pgtables()
 	 * should have release it.
@@ -2069,8 +2042,8 @@ static void __split_huge_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
 	 * free), userland could trigger a small page size TLB miss on the
 	 * small sized TLB while the hugepage TLB entry is still established in
 	 * the huge TLB. Some CPU doesn't like that.
-	 * See http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/41322.pdf, Erratum
-	 * 383 on page 93. Intel should be safe but is also warns that it's
+	 * See http://support.amd.com/TechDocs/41322_10h_Rev_Gd.pdf, Erratum
+	 * 383 on page 105. Intel should be safe but is also warns that it's
 	 * only safe if the permission and cache attributes of the two entries
 	 * loaded in the two TLB is identical (which should be the case here).
 	 * But it is generally safer to never allow small and huge TLB entries