aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/bridge
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>2021-07-21 19:24:01 +0300
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2021-07-22 00:26:23 -0700
commit2f5dc00f7a3ea669fd387ce79ffca92bff361550 (patch)
tree35bf64f1b5c0b9e01231f5ca719e7c9f53dbccd3 /net/bridge
parentnet: bridge: switchdev: recycle unused hwdoms (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-2f5dc00f7a3ea669fd387ce79ffca92bff361550.tar.xz
linux-dev-2f5dc00f7a3ea669fd387ce79ffca92bff361550.zip
net: bridge: switchdev: let drivers inform which bridge ports are offloaded
On reception of an skb, the bridge checks if it was marked as 'already forwarded in hardware' (checks if skb->offload_fwd_mark == 1), and if it is, it assigns the source hardware domain of that skb based on the hardware domain of the ingress port. Then during forwarding, it enforces that the egress port must have a different hardware domain than the ingress one (this is done in nbp_switchdev_allowed_egress). Non-switchdev drivers don't report any physical switch id (neither through devlink nor .ndo_get_port_parent_id), therefore the bridge assigns them a hardware domain of 0, and packets coming from them will always have skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0. So there aren't any restrictions. Problems appear due to the fact that DSA would like to perform software fallback for bonding and team interfaces that the physical switch cannot offload. +-- br0 ---+ / / | \ / / | \ / | | bond0 / | | / \ swp0 swp1 swp2 swp3 swp4 There, it is desirable that the presence of swp3 and swp4 under a non-offloaded LAG does not preclude us from doing hardware bridging beteen swp0, swp1 and swp2. The bandwidth of the CPU is often times high enough that software bridging between {swp0,swp1,swp2} and bond0 is not impractical. But this creates an impossible paradox given the current way in which port hardware domains are assigned. When the driver receives a packet from swp0 (say, due to flooding), it must set skb->offload_fwd_mark to something. - If we set it to 0, then the bridge will forward it towards swp1, swp2 and bond0. But the switch has already forwarded it towards swp1 and swp2 (not to bond0, remember, that isn't offloaded, so as far as the switch is concerned, ports swp3 and swp4 are not looking up the FDB, and the entire bond0 is a destination that is strictly behind the CPU). But we don't want duplicated traffic towards swp1 and swp2, so it's not ok to set skb->offload_fwd_mark = 0. - If we set it to 1, then the bridge will not forward the skb towards the ports with the same switchdev mark, i.e. not to swp1, swp2 and bond0. Towards swp1 and swp2 that's ok, but towards bond0? It should have forwarded the skb there. So the real issue is that bond0 will be assigned the same hardware domain as {swp0,swp1,swp2}, because the function that assigns hardware domains to bridge ports, nbp_switchdev_add(), recurses through bond0's lower interfaces until it finds something that implements devlink (calls dev_get_port_parent_id with bool recurse = true). This is a problem because the fact that bond0 can be offloaded by swp3 and swp4 in our example is merely an assumption. A solution is to give the bridge explicit hints as to what hardware domain it should use for each port. Currently, the bridging offload is very 'silent': a driver registers a netdevice notifier, which is put on the netns's notifier chain, and which sniffs around for NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER events where the upper is a bridge, and the lower is an interface it knows about (one registered by this driver, normally). Then, from within that notifier, it does a bunch of stuff behind the bridge's back, without the bridge necessarily knowing that there's somebody offloading that port. It looks like this: ip link set swp0 master br0 | v br_add_if() calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link() | v call_netdevice_notifiers | v dsa_slave_netdevice_event | v oh, hey! it's for me! | v .port_bridge_join What we do to solve the conundrum is to be less silent, and change the switchdev drivers to present themselves to the bridge. Something like this: ip link set swp0 master br0 | v br_add_if() calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link() | v bridge: Aye! I'll use this call_netdevice_notifiers ^ ppid as the | | hardware domain for v | this port, and zero dsa_slave_netdevice_event | if I got nothing. | | v | oh, hey! it's for me! | | | v | .port_bridge_join | | | +------------------------+ switchdev_bridge_port_offload(swp0, swp0) Then stacked interfaces (like bond0 on top of swp3/swp4) would be treated differently in DSA, depending on whether we can or cannot offload them. The offload case: ip link set bond0 master br0 | v br_add_if() calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link() | v bridge: Aye! I'll use this call_netdevice_notifiers ^ ppid as the | | switchdev mark for v | bond0. dsa_slave_netdevice_event | Coincidentally (or not), | | bond0 and swp0, swp1, swp2 v | all have the same switchdev hmm, it's not quite for me, | mark now, since the ASIC but my driver has already | is able to forward towards called .port_lag_join | all these ports in hw. for it, because I have | a port with dp->lag_dev == bond0. | | | v | .port_bridge_join | for swp3 and swp4 | | | +------------------------+ switchdev_bridge_port_offload(bond0, swp3) switchdev_bridge_port_offload(bond0, swp4) And the non-offload case: ip link set bond0 master br0 | v br_add_if() calls netdev_master_upper_dev_link() | v bridge waiting: call_netdevice_notifiers ^ huh, switchdev_bridge_port_offload | | wasn't called, okay, I'll use a v | hwdom of zero for this one. dsa_slave_netdevice_event : Then packets received on swp0 will | : not be software-forwarded towards v : swp1, but they will towards bond0. it's not for me, but bond0 is an upper of swp3 and swp4, but their dp->lag_dev is NULL because they couldn't offload it. Basically we can draw the conclusion that the lowers of a bridge port can come and go, so depending on the configuration of lowers for a bridge port, it can dynamically toggle between offloaded and unoffloaded. Therefore, we need an equivalent switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload too. This patch changes the way any switchdev driver interacts with the bridge. From now on, everybody needs to call switchdev_bridge_port_offload and switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload, otherwise the bridge will treat the port as non-offloaded and allow software flooding to other ports from the same ASIC. Note that these functions lay the ground for a more complex handshake between switchdev drivers and the bridge in the future. For drivers that will request a replay of the switchdev objects when they offload and unoffload a bridge port (DSA, dpaa2-switch, ocelot), we place the call to switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload() strategically inside the NETDEV_PRECHANGEUPPER notifier's code path, and not inside NETDEV_CHANGEUPPER. This is because the switchdev object replay helpers need the netdev adjacency lists to be valid, and that is only true in NETDEV_PRECHANGEUPPER. Cc: Vadym Kochan <vkochan@marvell.com> Cc: Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@marvell.com> Cc: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> Cc: Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@microchip.com> Cc: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com> Cc: UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> # dpaa2-switch: regression Acked-by: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com> # dpaa2-switch Tested-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> # ocelot-switch Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/bridge')
-rw-r--r--net/bridge/br_if.c13
-rw-r--r--net/bridge/br_private.h13
-rw-r--r--net/bridge/br_switchdev.c82
3 files changed, 75 insertions, 33 deletions
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
index c0df50e4abbb..86f6d7e93ea8 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
@@ -349,7 +349,6 @@ static void del_nbp(struct net_bridge_port *p)
nbp_backup_clear(p);
nbp_update_port_count(br);
- nbp_switchdev_del(p);
netdev_upper_dev_unlink(dev, br->dev);
@@ -644,10 +643,6 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev,
if (err)
goto err5;
- err = nbp_switchdev_add(p);
- if (err)
- goto err6;
-
dev_disable_lro(dev);
list_add_rcu(&p->list, &br->port_list);
@@ -685,13 +680,13 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev,
*/
err = dev_pre_changeaddr_notify(br->dev, dev->dev_addr, extack);
if (err)
- goto err7;
+ goto err6;
}
err = nbp_vlan_init(p, extack);
if (err) {
netdev_err(dev, "failed to initialize vlan filtering on this port\n");
- goto err7;
+ goto err6;
}
spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
@@ -714,14 +709,12 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev,
return 0;
-err7:
+err6:
if (fdb_synced)
br_fdb_unsync_static(br, p);
list_del_rcu(&p->list);
br_fdb_delete_by_port(br, p, 0, 1);
nbp_update_port_count(br);
- nbp_switchdev_del(p);
-err6:
netdev_upper_dev_unlink(dev, br->dev);
err5:
dev->priv_flags &= ~IFF_BRIDGE_PORT;
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
index d0e6ae25a4e4..fbf73a5256d0 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ struct net_bridge_port {
* hardware domain.
*/
int hwdom;
+ int offload_count;
+ struct netdev_phys_item_id ppid;
#endif
u16 group_fwd_mask;
u16 backup_redirected_cnt;
@@ -1857,8 +1859,6 @@ void br_switchdev_fdb_notify(struct net_bridge *br,
int br_switchdev_port_vlan_add(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid, u16 flags,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack);
int br_switchdev_port_vlan_del(struct net_device *dev, u16 vid);
-int nbp_switchdev_add(struct net_bridge_port *p);
-void nbp_switchdev_del(struct net_bridge_port *p);
void br_switchdev_init(struct net_bridge *br);
static inline void br_switchdev_frame_unmark(struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -1907,15 +1907,6 @@ static inline void br_switchdev_frame_unmark(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
}
-static inline int nbp_switchdev_add(struct net_bridge_port *p)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
-static inline void nbp_switchdev_del(struct net_bridge_port *p)
-{
-}
-
static inline void br_switchdev_init(struct net_bridge *br)
{
}
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
index f3120f13c293..39f0787fde01 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static int nbp_switchdev_hwdom_set(struct net_bridge_port *joining)
/* joining is yet to be added to the port list. */
list_for_each_entry(p, &br->port_list, list) {
- if (netdev_port_same_parent_id(joining->dev, p->dev)) {
+ if (netdev_phys_item_id_same(&joining->ppid, &p->ppid)) {
joining->hwdom = p->hwdom;
return 0;
}
@@ -162,27 +162,85 @@ static void nbp_switchdev_hwdom_put(struct net_bridge_port *leaving)
clear_bit(leaving->hwdom, &br->busy_hwdoms);
}
-int nbp_switchdev_add(struct net_bridge_port *p)
+static int nbp_switchdev_add(struct net_bridge_port *p,
+ struct netdev_phys_item_id ppid,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
- struct netdev_phys_item_id ppid = { };
- int err;
+ if (p->offload_count) {
+ /* Prevent unsupported configurations such as a bridge port
+ * which is a bonding interface, and the member ports are from
+ * different hardware switches.
+ */
+ if (!netdev_phys_item_id_same(&p->ppid, &ppid)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
+ "Same bridge port cannot be offloaded by two physical switches");
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
- ASSERT_RTNL();
+ /* Tolerate drivers that call switchdev_bridge_port_offload()
+ * more than once for the same bridge port, such as when the
+ * bridge port is an offloaded bonding/team interface.
+ */
+ p->offload_count++;
- err = dev_get_port_parent_id(p->dev, &ppid, true);
- if (err) {
- if (err == -EOPNOTSUPP)
- return 0;
- return err;
+ return 0;
}
+ p->ppid = ppid;
+ p->offload_count = 1;
+
return nbp_switchdev_hwdom_set(p);
}
-void nbp_switchdev_del(struct net_bridge_port *p)
+static void nbp_switchdev_del(struct net_bridge_port *p)
{
- ASSERT_RTNL();
+ if (WARN_ON(!p->offload_count))
+ return;
+
+ p->offload_count--;
+
+ if (p->offload_count)
+ return;
if (p->hwdom)
nbp_switchdev_hwdom_put(p);
}
+
+/* Let the bridge know that this port is offloaded, so that it can assign a
+ * switchdev hardware domain to it.
+ */
+int switchdev_bridge_port_offload(struct net_device *brport_dev,
+ struct net_device *dev,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ struct netdev_phys_item_id ppid;
+ struct net_bridge_port *p;
+ int err;
+
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+ p = br_port_get_rtnl(brport_dev);
+ if (!p)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ err = dev_get_port_parent_id(dev, &ppid, false);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ return nbp_switchdev_add(p, ppid, extack);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(switchdev_bridge_port_offload);
+
+void switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload(struct net_device *brport_dev)
+{
+ struct net_bridge_port *p;
+
+ ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+ p = br_port_get_rtnl(brport_dev);
+ if (!p)
+ return;
+
+ nbp_switchdev_del(p);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(switchdev_bridge_port_unoffload);