tcp: prepare fastopen code for upcoming listener changes

While auditing TCP stack for upcoming 'lockless' listener changes,
I found I had to change fastopen_init_queue() to properly init the object
before publishing it.

Otherwise an other cpu could try to lock the spinlock before it gets
properly initialized.

Instead of adding appropriate barriers, just remove dynamic memory
allocations :
- Structure is 28 bytes on 64bit arches. Using additional 8 bytes
  for holding a pointer seems overkill.
- Two listeners can share same cache line and performance would suffer.

If we really want to save few bytes, we would instead dynamically allocate
whole struct request_sock_queue in the future.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
index 694a5e8f4f9f..e1527882a578 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_connection_sock.c
@@ -335,9 +335,8 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err)
 
 	sk_acceptq_removed(sk);
 	if (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP &&
-	    tcp_rsk(req)->tfo_listener &&
-	    queue->fastopenq) {
-		spin_lock_bh(&queue->fastopenq->lock);
+	    tcp_rsk(req)->tfo_listener) {
+		spin_lock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
 		if (tcp_rsk(req)->tfo_listener) {
 			/* We are still waiting for the final ACK from 3WHS
 			 * so can't free req now. Instead, we set req->sk to
@@ -348,7 +347,7 @@ struct sock *inet_csk_accept(struct sock *sk, int flags, int *err)
 			req->sk = NULL;
 			req = NULL;
 		}
-		spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq->lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
 	}
 out:
 	release_sock(sk);
@@ -886,12 +885,12 @@ void inet_csk_listen_stop(struct sock *sk)
 		sk_acceptq_removed(sk);
 		reqsk_put(req);
 	}
-	if (queue->fastopenq) {
+	if (queue->fastopenq.rskq_rst_head) {
 		/* Free all the reqs queued in rskq_rst_head. */
-		spin_lock_bh(&queue->fastopenq->lock);
-		acc_req = queue->fastopenq->rskq_rst_head;
-		queue->fastopenq->rskq_rst_head = NULL;
-		spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq->lock);
+		spin_lock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
+		acc_req = queue->fastopenq.rskq_rst_head;
+		queue->fastopenq.rskq_rst_head = NULL;
+		spin_unlock_bh(&queue->fastopenq.lock);
 		while ((req = acc_req) != NULL) {
 			acc_req = req->dl_next;
 			reqsk_put(req);