tcp: uninline tcp_oow_rate_limited()

tcp_oow_rate_limited() is hardly used in fast path, there is
no point inlining it.

Signed-of-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 10d6bd93f229..7257eb206c07 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -3321,6 +3321,36 @@ static int tcp_ack_update_window(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, u32
 	return flag;
 }
 
+/* Return true if we're currently rate-limiting out-of-window ACKs and
+ * thus shouldn't send a dupack right now. We rate-limit dupacks in
+ * response to out-of-window SYNs or ACKs to mitigate ACK loops or DoS
+ * attacks that send repeated SYNs or ACKs for the same connection. To
+ * do this, we do not send a duplicate SYNACK or ACK if the remote
+ * endpoint is sending out-of-window SYNs or pure ACKs at a high rate.
+ */
+bool tcp_oow_rate_limited(struct net *net, const struct sk_buff *skb,
+			  int mib_idx, u32 *last_oow_ack_time)
+{
+	/* Data packets without SYNs are not likely part of an ACK loop. */
+	if ((TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq != TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq) &&
+	    !tcp_hdr(skb)->syn)
+		goto not_rate_limited;
+
+	if (*last_oow_ack_time) {
+		s32 elapsed = (s32)(tcp_time_stamp - *last_oow_ack_time);
+
+		if (0 <= elapsed && elapsed < sysctl_tcp_invalid_ratelimit) {
+			NET_INC_STATS_BH(net, mib_idx);
+			return true;	/* rate-limited: don't send yet! */
+		}
+	}
+
+	*last_oow_ack_time = tcp_time_stamp;
+
+not_rate_limited:
+	return false;	/* not rate-limited: go ahead, send dupack now! */
+}
+
 /* RFC 5961 7 [ACK Throttling] */
 static void tcp_send_challenge_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb)
 {