aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/sunrpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>2013-12-31 13:17:20 +0800
committerJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>2014-01-03 18:18:49 -0500
commit7e55b59b2f32afc83452ae250dfd6173c9a7b515 (patch)
treef8bbb3a9c80f4e29520f077b6962a287a1a46824 /net/sunrpc
parentNFSD: fix bad length checking for backchannel (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-7e55b59b2f32afc83452ae250dfd6173c9a7b515.tar.xz
linux-dev-7e55b59b2f32afc83452ae250dfd6173c9a7b515.zip
SUNRPC/NFSD: Support a new option for ignoring the result of svc_register
NFSv4 clients can contact port 2049 directly instead of needing the portmapper. Therefore a failure to register to the portmapper when starting an NFSv4-only server isn't really a problem. But Gareth Williams reports that an attempt to start an NFSv4-only server without starting portmap fails: #rpc.nfsd -N 2 -N 3 rpc.nfsd: writing fd to kernel failed: errno 111 (Connection refused) rpc.nfsd: unable to set any sockets for nfsd Add a flag to svc_version to tell the rpc layer it can safely ignore an rpcbind failure in the NFSv4-only case. Reported-by: Gareth Williams <gareth@garethwilliams.me.uk> Reviewed-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'net/sunrpc')
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/svc.c25
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
index e7fbe368b4a3..5de6801cd924 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
@@ -916,9 +916,6 @@ static int __svc_register(struct net *net, const char *progname,
#endif
}
- if (error < 0)
- printk(KERN_WARNING "svc: failed to register %sv%u RPC "
- "service (errno %d).\n", progname, version, -error);
return error;
}
@@ -937,6 +934,7 @@ int svc_register(const struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net,
const unsigned short port)
{
struct svc_program *progp;
+ struct svc_version *vers;
unsigned int i;
int error = 0;
@@ -946,7 +944,8 @@ int svc_register(const struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net,
for (progp = serv->sv_program; progp; progp = progp->pg_next) {
for (i = 0; i < progp->pg_nvers; i++) {
- if (progp->pg_vers[i] == NULL)
+ vers = progp->pg_vers[i];
+ if (vers == NULL)
continue;
dprintk("svc: svc_register(%sv%d, %s, %u, %u)%s\n",
@@ -955,16 +954,26 @@ int svc_register(const struct svc_serv *serv, struct net *net,
proto == IPPROTO_UDP? "udp" : "tcp",
port,
family,
- progp->pg_vers[i]->vs_hidden?
- " (but not telling portmap)" : "");
+ vers->vs_hidden ?
+ " (but not telling portmap)" : "");
- if (progp->pg_vers[i]->vs_hidden)
+ if (vers->vs_hidden)
continue;
error = __svc_register(net, progp->pg_name, progp->pg_prog,
i, family, proto, port);
- if (error < 0)
+
+ if (vers->vs_rpcb_optnl) {
+ error = 0;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (error < 0) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "svc: failed to register "
+ "%sv%u RPC service (errno %d).\n",
+ progp->pg_name, i, -error);
break;
+ }
}
}