aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/scripts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>2009-11-23 15:54:00 -0500
committerVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>2009-11-23 15:54:00 -0500
commitd8dd15781dd621c5ceab79083f4c5112787863f5 (patch)
tree49ee8bfc01d2ded7130a0c17298ca7a9db998fa4 /scripts
parentsctp: Update max.burst implementation (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-d8dd15781dd621c5ceab79083f4c5112787863f5.tar.xz
linux-dev-d8dd15781dd621c5ceab79083f4c5112787863f5.zip
sctp: Fix mis-ordering of user space data when multihoming in use
Recently had a bug reported to me, in which the user was sending packets with a payload containing a sequence number. The packets were getting delivered in order according the chunk TSN values, but the sequence values in the payload were arriving out of order. At first I thought it must be an application error, but we eventually found it to be a problem on the transmit side in the sctp stack. The conditions for the error are that multihoming must be in use, and it helps if each transport has a different pmtu. The problem occurs in sctp_outq_flush. Basically we dequeue packets from the data queue, and attempt to append them to the orrered packet for a given transport. After we append a data chunk we add the trasport to the end of a list of transports to have their packets sent at the end of sctp_outq_flush. The problem occurs when a data chunks fills up a offered packet on a transport. The function that does the appending (sctp_packet_transmit_chunk), will try to call sctp_packet_transmit on the full packet, and then append the chunk to a new packet. This call to sctp_packet_transmit, sends that packet ahead of the others that may be queued in the transport_list in sctp_outq_flush. The result is that frames that were sent in one order from the user space sending application get re-ordered prior to tsn assignment in sctp_packet_transmit, resulting in mis-sequencing of data payloads, even though tsn ordering is correct. The fix is to change where we assign a tsn. By doing this earlier, we are then free to place chunks in packets, whatever way we see fit and the protocol will make sure to do all the appropriate re-ordering on receive as is needed. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Reported-by: William Reich <reich@ulticom.com> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions