diff options
author | 2013-05-21 18:02:00 +1000 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2013-05-30 17:10:56 -0500 | |
commit | 08fb39051f5581df45ae2a20c6cf2d0c4cddf7c2 (patch) | |
tree | 858c00c8c52004aba5de4ff6305440052a6829f6 /tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-postgresql.py | |
parent | xfs: remote attribute lookups require the value length (diff) | |
download | linux-dev-08fb39051f5581df45ae2a20c6cf2d0c4cddf7c2.tar.xz linux-dev-08fb39051f5581df45ae2a20c6cf2d0c4cddf7c2.zip |
xfs: avoid nesting transactions in xfs_qm_scall_setqlim()
Lockdep reports:
=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
3.9.0+ #3 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------
setquota/28368 is trying to acquire lock:
(sb_internal){++++.?}, at: [<c11e8846>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x26/0x50
but task is already holding lock:
(sb_internal){++++.?}, at: [<c11e8846>] xfs_trans_alloc+0x26/0x50
from xfs_qm_scall_setqlim()->xfs_dqread() when a dquot needs to be
allocated.
xfs_qm_scall_setqlim() is starting a transaction and then not
passing it into xfs_qm_dqet() and so it starts it's own transaction
when allocating the dquot. Splat!
Fix this by not allocating the dquot in xfs_qm_scall_setqlim()
inside the setqlim transaction. This requires getting the dquot
first (and allocating it if necessary) then dropping and relocking
the dquot before joining it to the setqlim transaction.
Reported-by: Michael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
(cherry picked from commit f648167f3ac79018c210112508c732ea9bf67c7b)
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-postgresql.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions