aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorShmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>2022-08-21 14:35:18 +0300
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2022-08-23 22:48:03 +0200
commit5deedfbee84278da3b76fb7176dc3742f56eb370 (patch)
tree71371f810e5019d0eb7ccc3749ca52fd2df061cf /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests
parentbpf, flow_dissector: Introduce BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR_CONTINUE retcode for bpf progs (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-5deedfbee84278da3b76fb7176dc3742f56eb370.tar.xz
linux-dev-5deedfbee84278da3b76fb7176dc3742f56eb370.zip
bpf, test_run: Propagate bpf_flow_dissect's retval to user's bpf_attr.test.retval
Formerly, a boolean denoting whether bpf_flow_dissect returned BPF_OK was set into 'bpf_attr.test.retval'. Augment this, so users can check the actual return code of the dissector program under test. Existing prog_tests/flow_dissector*.c tests were correspondingly changed to check against each test's expected retval. Also, tests' resulting 'flow_keys' are verified only in case the expected retval is BPF_OK. This allows adding new tests that expect non BPF_OK. Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220821113519.116765-4-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c23
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_load_bytes.c2
2 files changed, 23 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c
index 0c1661ea996e..8fa3c454995e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector.c
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ struct test {
} pkt;
struct bpf_flow_keys keys;
__u32 flags;
+ __u32 retval;
};
#define VLAN_HLEN 4
@@ -126,6 +127,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.sport = 80,
.dport = 8080,
},
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "ipv6",
@@ -146,6 +148,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.sport = 80,
.dport = 8080,
},
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "802.1q-ipv4",
@@ -168,6 +171,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.sport = 80,
.dport = 8080,
},
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "802.1ad-ipv6",
@@ -191,6 +195,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.sport = 80,
.dport = 8080,
},
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "ipv4-frag",
@@ -217,6 +222,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.dport = 8080,
},
.flags = BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_PARSE_1ST_FRAG,
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "ipv4-no-frag",
@@ -239,6 +245,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.is_frag = true,
.is_first_frag = true,
},
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "ipv6-frag",
@@ -265,6 +272,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.dport = 8080,
},
.flags = BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_PARSE_1ST_FRAG,
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "ipv6-no-frag",
@@ -287,6 +295,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.is_frag = true,
.is_first_frag = true,
},
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "ipv6-flow-label",
@@ -309,6 +318,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.dport = 8080,
.flow_label = __bpf_constant_htonl(0xbeeef),
},
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "ipv6-no-flow-label",
@@ -331,6 +341,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.flow_label = __bpf_constant_htonl(0xbeeef),
},
.flags = BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_STOP_AT_FLOW_LABEL,
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "ipip-encap",
@@ -359,6 +370,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.sport = 80,
.dport = 8080,
},
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
{
.name = "ipip-no-encap",
@@ -386,6 +398,7 @@ struct test tests[] = {
.is_encap = true,
},
.flags = BPF_FLOW_DISSECTOR_F_STOP_AT_ENCAP,
+ .retval = BPF_OK,
},
};
@@ -503,6 +516,10 @@ static void run_tests_skb_less(int tap_fd, struct bpf_map *keys)
err = tx_tap(tap_fd, &tests[i].pkt, sizeof(tests[i].pkt));
CHECK(err < 0, "tx_tap", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno);
+ /* check the stored flow_keys only if BPF_OK expected */
+ if (tests[i].retval != BPF_OK)
+ continue;
+
err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(keys_fd, &key, &flow_keys);
ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
@@ -588,7 +605,11 @@ void test_flow_dissector(void)
err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
- ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 1, "test_run retval");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, tests[i].retval, "test_run retval");
+
+ /* check the resulting flow_keys only if BPF_OK returned */
+ if (topts.retval != BPF_OK)
+ continue;
ASSERT_EQ(topts.data_size_out, sizeof(flow_keys),
"test_run data_size_out");
CHECK_FLOW_KEYS(tests[i].name, flow_keys, tests[i].keys);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_load_bytes.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_load_bytes.c
index 36afb409c25f..c7a47b57ac91 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_load_bytes.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/flow_dissector_load_bytes.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ void serial_test_flow_dissector_load_bytes(void)
ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
ASSERT_EQ(topts.data_size_out, sizeof(flow_keys),
"test_run data_size_out");
- ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 1, "test_run retval");
+ ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, BPF_OK, "test_run retval");
if (fd >= -1)
close(fd);