aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>2017-06-13 15:52:13 -0700
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2017-06-14 14:56:25 -0400
commit31fd85816dbe3a714bcc3f67c17c3dd87011f79e (patch)
treed8c694e4997605254ea96a76c5d633f60ee091cf /tools/testing/selftests/bpf
parentmacvlan: propagate the mac address change status for lowerdev (diff)
downloadlinux-dev-31fd85816dbe3a714bcc3f67c17c3dd87011f79e.tar.xz
linux-dev-31fd85816dbe3a714bcc3f67c17c3dd87011f79e.zip
bpf: permits narrower load from bpf program context fields
Currently, verifier will reject a program if it contains an narrower load from the bpf context structure. For example, __u8 h = __sk_buff->hash, or __u16 p = __sk_buff->protocol __u32 sample_period = bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period which are narrower loads of 4-byte or 8-byte field. This patch solves the issue by: . Introduce a new parameter ctx_field_size to carry the field size of narrower load from prog type specific *__is_valid_access validator back to verifier. . The non-zero ctx_field_size for a memory access indicates (1). underlying prog type specific convert_ctx_accesses supporting non-whole-field access (2). the current insn is a narrower or whole field access. . In verifier, for such loads where load memory size is less than ctx_field_size, verifier transforms it to a full field load followed by proper masking. . Currently, __sk_buff and bpf_perf_event_data->sample_period are supporting narrowing loads. . Narrower stores are still not allowed as typical ctx stores are just normal stores. Because of this change, some tests in verifier will fail and these tests are removed. As a bonus, rename some out of bound __sk_buff->cb access to proper field name and remove two redundant "skb cb oob" tests. Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c92
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 79 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 4ee4708b0d60..13341700930c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -1073,44 +1073,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
- "check cb access: byte, oob 1",
+ "__sk_buff->hash, offset 0, byte store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: byte, oob 2",
+ "__sk_buff->tc_index, offset 3, byte store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: byte, oob 3",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: byte, oob 4",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 1),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index) + 3),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
@@ -1188,44 +1166,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: half, oob 1",
+ "check __sk_buff->hash, offset 0, half store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, hash)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: half, oob 2",
+ "check __sk_buff->tc_index, offset 2, half store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 2),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: half, oob 3",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 4),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: half, oob 4",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 2),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_index) + 2),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
@@ -1368,28 +1324,6 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
"check cb access: double, oob 2",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 8),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: double, oob 3",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 8),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
- .result = REJECT,
- },
- {
- "check cb access: double, oob 4",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4])),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
@@ -1398,22 +1332,22 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: double, oob 5",
+ "check __sk_buff->ifindex dw store not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[4]) + 8),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, ifindex)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
- "check cb access: double, oob 6",
+ "check __sk_buff->ifindex dw load not permitted",
.insns = {
BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
- offsetof(struct __sk_buff, cb[0]) - 8),
+ offsetof(struct __sk_buff, ifindex)),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",