diff options
| author |   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2022-03-04 19:28:17 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> | 2022-03-04 19:28:17 -0800 |
| commit | 6646dc241dd09e1e6141b32cd72e5b59c17c0ce5 (patch) | |
| tree | 9b75a2ca985f78f0f67d77367e20f394480a4194 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf | |
| parent | net: ethernet: sun: Remove redundant code (diff) | |
| parent | bpf: Small BPF verifier log improvements (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-6646dc241dd09e1e6141b32cd72e5b59c17c0ce5.tar.xz linux-dev-6646dc241dd09e1e6141b32cd72e5b59c17c0ce5.zip | |
Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2022-03-04
We've added 32 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain
a total of 59 files changed, 1038 insertions(+), 473 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Optimize BPF stackmap's build_id retrieval by caching last valid build_id,
as consecutive stack frames are likely to be in the same VMA and therefore
have the same build id, from Hao Luo.
2) Several improvements to arm64 BPF JIT, that is, support for JITing
the atomic[64]_fetch_add, atomic[64]_[fetch_]{and,or,xor} and lastly
atomic[64]_{xchg|cmpxchg}. Also fix the BTF line info dump for JITed
programs, from Hou Tao.
3) Optimize generic BPF map batch deletion by only enforcing synchronize_rcu()
barrier once upon return to user space, from Eric Dumazet.
4) For kernel build parse DWARF and generate BTF through pahole with enabled
multithreading, from Kui-Feng Lee.
5) BPF verifier usability improvements by making log info more concise and
replacing inv with scalar type name, from Mykola Lysenko.
6) Two follow-up fixes for BPF prog JIT pack allocator, from Song Liu.
7) Add a new Kconfig to allow for loading kernel modules with non-matching
BTF type info; their BTF info is then removed on load, from Connor O'Brien.
8) Remove reallocarray() usage from bpftool and switch to libbpf_reallocarray()
in order to fix compilation errors for older glibc, from Mauricio Vásquez.
9) Fix libbpf to error on conflicting name in BTF when type declaration
appears before the definition, from Xu Kuohai.
10) Fix issue in BPF preload for in-kernel light skeleton where loaded BPF
program fds prevent init process from setting up fd 0-2, from Yucong Sun.
11) Fix libbpf reuse of pinned perf RB map when max_entries is auto-determined
by libbpf, from Stijn Tintel.
12) Several cleanups for libbpf and a fix to enforce perf RB map #pages to be
non-zero, from Yuntao Wang.
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (32 commits)
bpf: Small BPF verifier log improvements
libbpf: Add a check to ensure that page_cnt is non-zero
bpf, x86: Set header->size properly before freeing it
x86: Disable HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC on 32-bit x86
bpf, test_run: Fix overflow in XDP frags bpf_test_finish
selftests/bpf: Update btf_dump case for conflicting names
libbpf: Skip forward declaration when counting duplicated type names
bpf: Add some description about BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON in Kconfig
bpf, docs: Add a missing colon in verifier.rst
bpf: Cache the last valid build_id
libbpf: Fix BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY auto-pinning
bpf, selftests: Use raw_tp program for atomic test
bpf, arm64: Support more atomic operations
bpftool: Remove redundant slashes
bpf: Add config to allow loading modules with BTF mismatches
bpf, arm64: Feed byte-offset into bpf line info
bpf, arm64: Call build_prologue() first in first JIT pass
bpf: Fix issue with bpf preload module taking over stdout/stdin of kernel.
bpftool: Bpf skeletons assert type sizes
bpf: Cleanup comments
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220304164313.31675-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf')
26 files changed, 281 insertions, 271 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore index 1dad8d617da8..a7eead8820a0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/.gitignore @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +bpftool bpf-helpers* bpf-syscall* test_verifier diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile index 91ea729990da..fe12b4f5fe20 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile @@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/$(TRUNNER_BINARY): $(TRUNNER_TEST_OBJS) \ $$(call msg,BINARY,,$$@) $(Q)$$(CC) $$(CFLAGS) $$(filter %.a %.o,$$^) $$(LDLIBS) -o $$@ $(Q)$(RESOLVE_BTFIDS) --btf $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/btf_data.o $$@ + $(Q)ln -sf $(if $2,..,.)/tools/build/bpftool/bootstrap/bpftool $(if $2,$2/)bpftool endef @@ -555,7 +556,7 @@ $(OUTPUT)/bench: $(OUTPUT)/bench.o \ EXTRA_CLEAN := $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS) $(SCRATCH_DIR) $(HOST_SCRATCH_DIR) \ prog_tests/tests.h map_tests/tests.h verifier/tests.h \ - feature \ + feature bpftool \ $(addprefix $(OUTPUT)/,*.o *.skel.h *.lskel.h no_alu32 bpf_gcc bpf_testmod.ko) .PHONY: docs docs-clean diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c index 0ee29e11eaee..970f09156eb4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/align.c @@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .matches = { - {0, "R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)"}, + {0, "R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0)"}, {0, "R10=fp0"}, - {0, "R3_w=inv2"}, - {1, "R3_w=inv4"}, - {2, "R3_w=inv8"}, - {3, "R3_w=inv16"}, - {4, "R3_w=inv32"}, + {0, "R3_w=2"}, + {1, "R3_w=4"}, + {2, "R3_w=8"}, + {3, "R3_w=16"}, + {4, "R3_w=32"}, }, }, { @@ -67,19 +67,19 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .matches = { - {0, "R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)"}, + {0, "R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0)"}, {0, "R10=fp0"}, - {0, "R3_w=inv1"}, - {1, "R3_w=inv2"}, - {2, "R3_w=inv4"}, - {3, "R3_w=inv8"}, - {4, "R3_w=inv16"}, - {5, "R3_w=inv1"}, - {6, "R4_w=inv32"}, - {7, "R4_w=inv16"}, - {8, "R4_w=inv8"}, - {9, "R4_w=inv4"}, - {10, "R4_w=inv2"}, + {0, "R3_w=1"}, + {1, "R3_w=2"}, + {2, "R3_w=4"}, + {3, "R3_w=8"}, + {4, "R3_w=16"}, + {5, "R3_w=1"}, + {6, "R4_w=32"}, + {7, "R4_w=16"}, + {8, "R4_w=8"}, + {9, "R4_w=4"}, + {10, "R4_w=2"}, }, }, { @@ -96,14 +96,14 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .matches = { - {0, "R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)"}, + {0, "R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0)"}, {0, "R10=fp0"}, - {0, "R3_w=inv4"}, - {1, "R3_w=inv8"}, - {2, "R3_w=inv10"}, - {3, "R4_w=inv8"}, - {4, "R4_w=inv12"}, - {5, "R4_w=inv14"}, + {0, "R3_w=4"}, + {1, "R3_w=8"}, + {2, "R3_w=10"}, + {3, "R4_w=8"}, + {4, "R4_w=12"}, + {5, "R4_w=14"}, }, }, { @@ -118,12 +118,12 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .matches = { - {0, "R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)"}, + {0, "R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0)"}, {0, "R10=fp0"}, - {0, "R3_w=inv7"}, - {1, "R3_w=inv7"}, - {2, "R3_w=inv14"}, - {3, "R3_w=inv56"}, + {0, "R3_w=7"}, + {1, "R3_w=7"}, + {2, "R3_w=14"}, + {3, "R3_w=56"}, }, }, @@ -161,19 +161,19 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .matches = { - {6, "R0_w=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8,imm=0)"}, - {6, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, - {7, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"}, - {8, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, - {9, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f8))"}, - {10, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4080,var_off=(0x0; 0xff0))"}, - {12, "R3_w=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0)"}, - {17, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, - {18, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=8160,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe0))"}, - {19, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4080,var_off=(0x0; 0xff0))"}, - {20, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f8))"}, - {21, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, - {22, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"}, + {6, "R0_w=pkt(off=8,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {6, "R3_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, + {7, "R3_w=scalar(umax=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"}, + {8, "R3_w=scalar(umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {9, "R3_w=scalar(umax=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f8))"}, + {10, "R3_w=scalar(umax=4080,var_off=(0x0; 0xff0))"}, + {12, "R3_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0)"}, + {17, "R4_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, + {18, "R4_w=scalar(umax=8160,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe0))"}, + {19, "R4_w=scalar(umax=4080,var_off=(0x0; 0xff0))"}, + {20, "R4_w=scalar(umax=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f8))"}, + {21, "R4_w=scalar(umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {22, "R4_w=scalar(umax=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"}, }, }, { @@ -194,16 +194,16 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .matches = { - {6, "R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, - {7, "R4_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, - {8, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, - {9, "R4_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, - {10, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"}, - {11, "R4_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, - {12, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, - {13, "R4_w=inv(id=1,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, - {14, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f8))"}, - {15, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4080,var_off=(0x0; 0xff0))"}, + {6, "R3_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, + {7, "R4_w=scalar(id=1,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, + {8, "R4_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, + {9, "R4_w=scalar(id=1,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, + {10, "R4_w=scalar(umax=510,var_off=(0x0; 0x1fe))"}, + {11, "R4_w=scalar(id=1,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, + {12, "R4_w=scalar(umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {13, "R4_w=scalar(id=1,umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, + {14, "R4_w=scalar(umax=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f8))"}, + {15, "R4_w=scalar(umax=4080,var_off=(0x0; 0xff0))"}, }, }, { @@ -234,14 +234,14 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .matches = { - {2, "R5_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"}, - {4, "R5_w=pkt(id=0,off=14,r=0,imm=0)"}, - {5, "R4_w=pkt(id=0,off=14,r=0,imm=0)"}, - {9, "R2=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=18,imm=0)"}, - {10, "R5=pkt(id=0,off=14,r=18,imm=0)"}, - {10, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, - {13, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=65535,var_off=(0x0; 0xffff))"}, - {14, "R4_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=65535,var_off=(0x0; 0xffff))"}, + {2, "R5_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0)"}, + {4, "R5_w=pkt(off=14,r=0,imm=0)"}, + {5, "R4_w=pkt(off=14,r=0,imm=0)"}, + {9, "R2=pkt(off=0,r=18,imm=0)"}, + {10, "R5=pkt(off=14,r=18,imm=0)"}, + {10, "R4_w=scalar(umax=255,var_off=(0x0; 0xff))"}, + {13, "R4_w=scalar(umax=65535,var_off=(0x0; 0xffff))"}, + {14, "R4_w=scalar(umax=65535,var_off=(0x0; 0xffff))"}, }, }, { @@ -296,59 +296,59 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known * alignment of 4. */ - {6, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, - {7, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {6, "R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {7, "R6_w=scalar(umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Offset is added to packet pointer R5, resulting in * known fixed offset, and variable offset from R6. */ - {11, "R5_w=pkt(id=1,off=14,r=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {11, "R5_w=pkt(id=1,off=14,r=0,umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * it's total offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (0) + * reg->aux_off (14) which is 16. Then the variable * offset is considered using reg->aux_off_align which * is 4 and meets the load's requirements. */ - {15, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=18,r=18,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, - {15, "R5=pkt(id=1,off=14,r=18,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {15, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=18,r=18,umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {15, "R5=pkt(id=1,off=14,r=18,umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Variable offset is added to R5 packet pointer, * resulting in auxiliary alignment of 4. */ - {17, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {17, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=0,umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Constant offset is added to R5, resulting in * reg->off of 14. */ - {18, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=14,r=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {18, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=14,r=0,umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * its total fixed offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off * (14) which is 16. Then the variable offset is 4-byte * aligned, so the total offset is 4-byte aligned and * meets the load's requirements. */ - {23, "R4=pkt(id=2,off=18,r=18,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, - {23, "R5=pkt(id=2,off=14,r=18,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {23, "R4=pkt(id=2,off=18,r=18,umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {23, "R5=pkt(id=2,off=14,r=18,umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Constant offset is added to R5 packet pointer, * resulting in reg->off value of 14. */ - {25, "R5_w=pkt(id=0,off=14,r=8"}, + {25, "R5_w=pkt(off=14,r=8"}, /* Variable offset is added to R5, resulting in a * variable offset of (4n). */ - {26, "R5_w=pkt(id=3,off=14,r=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {26, "R5_w=pkt(id=3,off=14,r=0,umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Constant is added to R5 again, setting reg->off to 18. */ - {27, "R5_w=pkt(id=3,off=18,r=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {27, "R5_w=pkt(id=3,off=18,r=0,umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* And once more we add a variable; resulting var_off * is still (4n), fixed offset is not changed. * Also, we create a new reg->id. */ - {28, "R5_w=pkt(id=4,off=18,r=0,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc)"}, + {28, "R5_w=pkt(id=4,off=18,r=0,umax=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc)"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * its total fixed offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (18) * which is 20. Then the variable offset is (4n), so * the total offset is 4-byte aligned and meets the * load's requirements. */ - {33, "R4=pkt(id=4,off=22,r=22,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc)"}, - {33, "R5=pkt(id=4,off=18,r=22,umax_value=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc)"}, + {33, "R4=pkt(id=4,off=22,r=22,umax=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc)"}, + {33, "R5=pkt(id=4,off=18,r=22,umax=2040,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc)"}, }, }, { @@ -386,36 +386,36 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known * alignment of 4. */ - {6, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, - {7, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {6, "R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {7, "R6_w=scalar(umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */ - {8, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, + {8, "R6_w=scalar(umin=14,umax=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, /* Packet pointer has (4n+2) offset */ - {11, "R5_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, - {12, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, + {11, "R5_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin=14,umax=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, + {12, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin=14,umax=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * its total fixed offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (0) * which is 2. Then the variable offset is (4n+2), so * the total offset is 4-byte aligned and meets the * load's requirements. */ - {15, "R5=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=4,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, + {15, "R5=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=4,umin=14,umax=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, /* Newly read value in R6 was shifted left by 2, so has * known alignment of 4. */ - {17, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {17, "R6_w=scalar(umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Added (4n) to packet pointer's (4n+2) var_off, giving * another (4n+2). */ - {19, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc)"}, - {20, "R4=pkt(id=2,off=4,r=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc)"}, + {19, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=0,umin=14,umax=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc)"}, + {20, "R4=pkt(id=2,off=4,r=0,umin=14,umax=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc)"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * its total fixed offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (0) * which is 2. Then the variable offset is (4n+2), so * the total offset is 4-byte aligned and meets the * load's requirements. */ - {23, "R5=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=4,umin_value=14,umax_value=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc)"}, + {23, "R5=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=4,umin=14,umax=2054,var_off=(0x2; 0xffc)"}, }, }, { @@ -448,18 +448,18 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .matches = { - {3, "R5_w=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0)"}, + {3, "R5_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0)"}, /* (ptr - ptr) << 2 == unknown, (4n) */ - {5, "R5_w=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, + {5, "R5_w=scalar(smax=9223372036854775804,umax=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because * the add could overflow. */ - {6, "R5_w=inv(id=0,smin_value=-9223372036854775806,smax_value=9223372036854775806,umin_value=2,umax_value=18446744073709551614,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, + {6, "R5_w=scalar(smin=-9223372036854775806,smax=9223372036854775806,umin=2,umax=18446744073709551614,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, /* Checked s>=0 */ - {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, + {9, "R5=scalar(umin=2,umax=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ - {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, - {12, "R4_w=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, + {11, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin=2,umax=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, + {12, "R4_w=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin=2,umax=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine. * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access * attempt will fail. */ - {15, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, + {15, "R6_w=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin=2,umax=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc)"}, } }, { @@ -502,23 +502,23 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known * alignment of 4. */ - {6, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, - {8, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {6, "R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {8, "R6_w=scalar(umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */ - {9, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, + {9, "R6_w=scalar(umin=14,umax=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, /* New unknown value in R7 is (4n) */ - {10, "R7_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, + {10, "R7_w=scalar(umax=1020,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fc))"}, /* Subtracting it from R6 blows our unsigned bounds */ - {11, "R6=inv(id=0,smin_value=-1006,smax_value=1034,umin_value=2,umax_value=18446744073709551614,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, + {11, "R6=scalar(smin=-1006,smax=1034,umin=2,umax=18446744073709551614,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc)"}, /* Checked s>= 0 */ - {14, "R6=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, + {14, "R6=scalar(umin=2,umax=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc))"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * its total fixed offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (0) * which is 2. Then the variable offset is (4n+2), so * the total offset is 4-byte aligned and meets the * load's requirements. */ - {20, "R5=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=4,umin_value=2,umax_value=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, + {20, "R5=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=4,umin=2,umax=1034,var_off=(0x2; 0x7fc)"}, }, }, @@ -556,23 +556,23 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { /* Calculated offset in R6 has unknown value, but known * alignment of 4. */ - {6, "R2_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, - {9, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=60,var_off=(0x0; 0x3c))"}, + {6, "R2_w=pkt(off=0,r=8,imm=0)"}, + {9, "R6_w=scalar(umax=60,var_off=(0x0; 0x3c))"}, /* Adding 14 makes R6 be (4n+2) */ - {10, "R6_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=14,umax_value=74,var_off=(0x2; 0x7c))"}, + {10, "R6_w=scalar(umin=14,umax=74,var_off=(0x2; 0x7c))"}, /* Subtracting from packet pointer overflows ubounds */ - {13, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=8,umin_value=18446744073709551542,umax_value=18446744073709551602,var_off=(0xffffffffffffff82; 0x7c)"}, + {13, "R5_w=pkt(id=2,off=0,r=8,umin=18446744073709551542,umax=18446744073709551602,var_off=(0xffffffffffffff82; 0x7c)"}, /* New unknown value in R7 is (4n), >= 76 */ - {14, "R7_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=76,umax_value=1096,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc))"}, + {14, "R7_w=scalar(umin=76,umax=1096,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fc))"}, /* Adding it to packet pointer gives nice bounds again */ - {16, "R5_w=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=1082,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffc)"}, + {16, "R5_w=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=0,umin=2,umax=1082,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffc)"}, /* At the time the word size load is performed from R5, * its total fixed offset is NET_IP_ALIGN + reg->off (0) * which is 2. Then the variable offset is (4n+2), so * the total offset is 4-byte aligned and meets the * load's requirements. */ - {20, "R5=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=4,umin_value=2,umax_value=1082,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffc)"}, + {20, "R5=pkt(id=3,off=0,r=4,umin=2,umax=1082,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffc)"}, }, }, }; @@ -648,8 +648,8 @@ static int do_test_single(struct bpf_align_test *test) /* Check the next line as well in case the previous line * did not have a corresponding bpf insn. Example: * func#0 @0 - * 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 - * 0: (b7) r3 = 2 ; R3_w=inv2 + * 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 + * 0: (b7) r3 = 2 ; R3_w=2 */ if (!strstr(line_ptr, m.match)) { cur_line = -1; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomics.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomics.c index ab62aba10e2b..13e101f370a1 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomics.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/atomics.c @@ -7,19 +7,15 @@ static void test_add(struct atomics_lskel *skel) { int err, prog_fd; - int link_fd; LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); - link_fd = atomics_lskel__add__attach(skel); - if (!ASSERT_GT(link_fd, 0, "attach(add)")) - return; - + /* No need to attach it, just run it directly */ prog_fd = skel->progs.add.prog_fd; err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err")) - goto cleanup; + return; if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run_opts retval")) - goto cleanup; + return; ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->add64_value, 3, "add64_value"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->add64_result, 1, "add64_result"); @@ -31,27 +27,20 @@ static void test_add(struct atomics_lskel *skel) ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->add_stack_result, 1, "add_stack_result"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->add_noreturn_value, 3, "add_noreturn_value"); - -cleanup: - close(link_fd); } static void test_sub(struct atomics_lskel *skel) { int err, prog_fd; - int link_fd; LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); - link_fd = atomics_lskel__sub__attach(skel); - if (!ASSERT_GT(link_fd, 0, "attach(sub)")) - return; - + /* No need to attach it, just run it directly */ prog_fd = skel->progs.sub.prog_fd; err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err")) - goto cleanup; + return; if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run_opts retval")) - goto cleanup; + return; ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sub64_value, -1, "sub64_value"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->sub64_result, 1, "sub64_result"); @@ -63,27 +52,20 @@ static void test_sub(struct atomics_lskel *skel) ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->sub_stack_result, 1, "sub_stack_result"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->sub_noreturn_value, -1, "sub_noreturn_value"); - -cleanup: - close(link_fd); } static void test_and(struct atomics_lskel *skel) { int err, prog_fd; - int link_fd; LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); - link_fd = atomics_lskel__and__attach(skel); - if (!ASSERT_GT(link_fd, 0, "attach(and)")) - return; - + /* No need to attach it, just run it directly */ prog_fd = skel->progs.and.prog_fd; err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err")) - goto cleanup; + return; if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run_opts retval")) - goto cleanup; + return; ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->and64_value, 0x010ull << 32, "and64_value"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->and64_result, 0x110ull << 32, "and64_result"); @@ -92,26 +74,20 @@ static void test_and(struct atomics_lskel *skel) ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->and32_result, 0x110, "and32_result"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->and_noreturn_value, 0x010ull << 32, "and_noreturn_value"); -cleanup: - close(link_fd); } static void test_or(struct atomics_lskel *skel) { int err, prog_fd; - int link_fd; LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); - link_fd = atomics_lskel__or__attach(skel); - if (!ASSERT_GT(link_fd, 0, "attach(or)")) - return; - + /* No need to attach it, just run it directly */ prog_fd = skel->progs.or.prog_fd; err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err")) - goto cleanup; + return; if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run_opts retval")) - goto cleanup; + return; ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->or64_value, 0x111ull << 32, "or64_value"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->or64_result, 0x110ull << 32, "or64_result"); @@ -120,26 +96,20 @@ static void test_or(struct atomics_lskel *skel) ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->or32_result, 0x110, "or32_result"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->or_noreturn_value, 0x111ull << 32, "or_noreturn_value"); -cleanup: - close(link_fd); } static void test_xor(struct atomics_lskel *skel) { int err, prog_fd; - int link_fd; LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); - link_fd = atomics_lskel__xor__attach(skel); - if (!ASSERT_GT(link_fd, 0, "attach(xor)")) - return; - + /* No need to attach it, just run it directly */ prog_fd = skel->progs.xor.prog_fd; err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err")) - goto cleanup; + return; if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run_opts retval")) - goto cleanup; + return; ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->xor64_value, 0x101ull << 32, "xor64_value"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xor64_result, 0x110ull << 32, "xor64_result"); @@ -148,26 +118,20 @@ static void test_xor(struct atomics_lskel *skel) ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xor32_result, 0x110, "xor32_result"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->xor_noreturn_value, 0x101ull << 32, "xor_nxoreturn_value"); -cleanup: - close(link_fd); } static void test_cmpxchg(struct atomics_lskel *skel) { int err, prog_fd; - int link_fd; LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); - link_fd = atomics_lskel__cmpxchg__attach(skel); - if (!ASSERT_GT(link_fd, 0, "attach(cmpxchg)")) - return; - + /* No need to attach it, just run it directly */ prog_fd = skel->progs.cmpxchg.prog_fd; err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err")) - goto cleanup; + return; if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run_opts retval")) - goto cleanup; + return; ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->cmpxchg64_value, 2, "cmpxchg64_value"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->cmpxchg64_result_fail, 1, "cmpxchg_result_fail"); @@ -176,45 +140,34 @@ static void test_cmpxchg(struct atomics_lskel *skel) ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->cmpxchg32_value, 2, "lcmpxchg32_value"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->cmpxchg32_result_fail, 1, "cmpxchg_result_fail"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->cmpxchg32_result_succeed, 1, "cmpxchg_result_succeed"); - -cleanup: - close(link_fd); } static void test_xchg(struct atomics_lskel *skel) { int err, prog_fd; - int link_fd; LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts); - link_fd = atomics_lskel__xchg__attach(skel); - if (!ASSERT_GT(link_fd, 0, "attach(xchg)")) - return; - + /* No need to attach it, just run it directly */ prog_fd = skel->progs.xchg.prog_fd; err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts); if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run_opts err")) - goto cleanup; + return; if (!ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "test_run_opts retval")) - goto cleanup; + return; ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->xchg64_value, 2, "xchg64_value"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xchg64_result, 1, "xchg64_result"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->xchg32_value, 2, "xchg32_value"); ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->xchg32_result, 1, "xchg32_result"); - -cleanup: - close(link_fd); } void test_atomics(void) { struct atomics_lskel *skel; - __u32 duration = 0; skel = atomics_lskel__open_and_load(); - if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_load", "atomics skeleton failed\n")) + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "atomics skeleton load")) return; if (skel->data->skip_tests) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c index 9e26903f9170..5fce7008d1ff 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c @@ -148,22 +148,38 @@ static void test_btf_dump_incremental(void) /* First, generate BTF corresponding to the following C code: * - * enum { VAL = 1 }; + * enum x; + * + * enum x { X = 1 }; + * + * enum { Y = 1 }; + * + * struct s; * * struct s { int x; }; * */ + id = btf__add_enum(btf, "x", 4); + ASSERT_EQ(id, 1, "enum_declaration_id"); + id = btf__add_enum(btf, "x", 4); + ASSERT_EQ(id, 2, "named_enum_id"); + err = btf__add_enum_value(btf, "X", 1); + ASSERT_OK(err, "named_enum_val_ok"); + id = btf__add_enum(btf, NULL, 4); - ASSERT_EQ(id, 1, "enum_id"); - err = btf__add_enum_value(btf, "VAL", 1); - ASSERT_OK(err, "enum_val_ok"); + ASSERT_EQ(id, 3, "anon_enum_id"); + err = btf__add_enum_value(btf, "Y", 1); + ASSERT_OK(err, "anon_enum_val_ok"); id = btf__add_int(btf, "int", 4, BTF_INT_SIGNED); - ASSERT_EQ(id, 2, "int_id"); + ASSERT_EQ(id, 4, "int_id"); + + id = btf__add_fwd(btf, "s", BTF_FWD_STRUCT); + ASSERT_EQ(id, 5, "fwd_id"); id = btf__add_struct(btf, "s", 4); - ASSERT_EQ(id, 3, "struct_id"); - err = btf__add_field(btf, "x", 2, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(id, 6, "struct_id"); + err = btf__add_field(btf, "x", 4, 0, 0); ASSERT_OK(err, "field_ok"); for (i = 1; i < btf__type_cnt(btf); i++) { @@ -173,11 +189,20 @@ static void test_btf_dump_incremental(void) fflush(dump_buf_file); dump_buf[dump_buf_sz] = 0; /* some libc implementations don't do this */ + ASSERT_STREQ(dump_buf, +"enum x;\n" +"\n" +"enum x {\n" +" X = 1,\n" +"};\n" +"\n" "enum {\n" -" VAL = 1,\n" +" Y = 1,\n" "};\n" "\n" +"struct s;\n" +"\n" "struct s {\n" " int x;\n" "};\n\n", "c_dump1"); @@ -199,10 +224,12 @@ static void test_btf_dump_incremental(void) fseek(dump_buf_file, 0, SEEK_SET); id = btf__add_struct(btf, "s", 4); - ASSERT_EQ(id, 4, "struct_id"); - err = btf__add_field(btf, "x", 1, 0, 0); + ASSERT_EQ(id, 7, "struct_id"); + err = btf__add_field(btf, "x", 2, 0, 0); + ASSERT_OK(err, "field_ok"); + err = btf__add_field(btf, "y", 3, 32, 0); ASSERT_OK(err, "field_ok"); - err = btf__add_field(btf, "s", 3, 32, 0); + err = btf__add_field(btf, "s", 6, 64, 0); ASSERT_OK(err, "field_ok"); for (i = 1; i < btf__type_cnt(btf); i++) { @@ -214,9 +241,10 @@ static void test_btf_dump_incremental(void) dump_buf[dump_buf_sz] = 0; /* some libc implementations don't do this */ ASSERT_STREQ(dump_buf, "struct s___2 {\n" +" enum x x;\n" " enum {\n" -" VAL___2 = 1,\n" -" } x;\n" +" Y___2 = 1,\n" +" } y;\n" " struct s s;\n" "};\n\n" , "c_dump1"); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c index 8fbb40a832d5..f28f75aa9154 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc.c @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static int __trigger_module_test_read(const struct core_reloc_test_case *test) } -static struct core_reloc_test_case test_cases[] = { +static const struct core_reloc_test_case test_cases[] = { /* validate we can find kernel image and use its BTF for relocs */ { .case_name = "kernel", @@ -843,7 +843,7 @@ static int run_btfgen(const char *src_btf, const char *dst_btf, const char *objp int n; n = snprintf(command, sizeof(command), - "./tools/build/bpftool/bpftool gen min_core_btf %s %s %s", + "./bpftool gen min_core_btf %s %s %s", src_btf, dst_btf, objpath); if (n < 0 || n >= sizeof(command)) return -1; @@ -855,7 +855,7 @@ static void run_core_reloc_tests(bool use_btfgen) { const size_t mmap_sz = roundup_page(sizeof(struct data)); DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, open_opts); - struct core_reloc_test_case *test_case; + struct core_reloc_test_case *test_case, test_case_copy; const char *tp_name, *probe_name; int err, i, equal, fd; struct bpf_link *link = NULL; @@ -870,7 +870,10 @@ static void run_core_reloc_tests(bool use_btfgen) for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_cases); i++) { char btf_file[] = "/tmp/core_reloc.btf.XXXXXX"; - test_case = &test_cases[i]; + + test_case_copy = test_cases[i]; + test_case = &test_case_copy; + if (!test__start_subtest(test_case->case_name)) continue; @@ -881,6 +884,7 @@ static void run_core_reloc_tests(bool use_btfgen) /* generate a "minimal" BTF file and use it as source */ if (use_btfgen) { + if (!test_case->btf_src_file || test_case->fails) { test__skip(); continue; @@ -989,7 +993,8 @@ cleanup: CHECK_FAIL(munmap(mmap_data, mmap_sz)); mmap_data = NULL; } - remove(btf_file); + if (use_btfgen) + remove(test_case->btf_src_file); bpf_link__destroy(link); link = NULL; bpf_object__close(obj); @@ -1001,7 +1006,7 @@ void test_core_reloc(void) run_core_reloc_tests(false); } -void test_core_btfgen(void) +void test_core_reloc_btfgen(void) { run_core_reloc_tests(true); } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c index 1ef377a7e731..fe9a23e65ef4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static void obj_load_log_buf(void) ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(libbpf_log_buf, "prog 'bad_prog': BPF program load failed"), "libbpf_log_not_empty"); ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(obj_log_buf, "DATASEC license"), "obj_log_not_empty"); - ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(good_log_buf, "0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0"), + ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(good_log_buf, "0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0"), "good_log_verbose"); ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(bad_log_buf, "invalid access to map value, value_size=16 off=16000 size=4"), "bad_log_not_empty"); @@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static void bpf_prog_load_log_buf(void) opts.log_level = 2; fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER, "good_prog", "GPL", good_prog_insns, good_prog_insn_cnt, &opts); - ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(log_buf, "0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0"), "good_log_2"); + ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(log_buf, "0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0"), "good_log_2"); ASSERT_GE(fd, 0, "good_fd2"); if (fd >= 0) close(fd); diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/atomics.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/atomics.c index 16e57313204a..f89c7f0cc53b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/atomics.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/atomics.c @@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ __u64 add_stack_value_copy = 0; __u64 add_stack_result = 0; __u64 add_noreturn_value = 1; -SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") -int BPF_PROG(add, int a) +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter") +int add(const void *ctx) { if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32)) return 0; @@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ __s64 sub_stack_value_copy = 0; __s64 sub_stack_result = 0; __s64 sub_noreturn_value = 1; -SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") -int BPF_PROG(sub, int a) +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter") +int sub(const void *ctx) { if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32)) return 0; @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ __u32 and32_value = 0x110; __u32 and32_result = 0; __u64 and_noreturn_value = (0x110ull << 32); -SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") -int BPF_PROG(and, int a) +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter") +int and(const void *ctx) { if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32)) return 0; @@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ __u32 or32_value = 0x110; __u32 or32_result = 0; __u64 or_noreturn_value = (0x110ull << 32); -SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") -int BPF_PROG(or, int a) +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter") +int or(const void *ctx) { if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32)) return 0; @@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ __u32 xor32_value = 0x110; __u32 xor32_result = 0; __u64 xor_noreturn_value = (0x110ull << 32); -SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") -int BPF_PROG(xor, int a) +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter") +int xor(const void *ctx) { if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32)) return 0; @@ -132,8 +132,8 @@ __u32 cmpxchg32_value = 1; __u32 cmpxchg32_result_fail = 0; __u32 cmpxchg32_result_succeed = 0; -SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") -int BPF_PROG(cmpxchg, int a) +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter") +int cmpxchg(const void *ctx) { if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32)) return 0; @@ -153,8 +153,8 @@ __u64 xchg64_result = 0; __u32 xchg32_value = 1; __u32 xchg32_result = 0; -SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1") -int BPF_PROG(xchg, int a) +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter") +int xchg(const void *ctx) { if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32)) return 0; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp index 773f165c4898..19ad172036da 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cpp.cpp @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ /* SPDX-License-Identifier: (LGPL-2.1 OR BSD-2-Clause) */ #include <iostream> +#pragma GCC diagnostic push +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wdeprecated-declarations" #include <bpf/libbpf.h> +#pragma GCC diagnostic pop #include <bpf/bpf.h> #include <bpf/btf.h> #include "test_core_extern.skel.h" diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_invalid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_invalid.c index 39272720b2f6..25f4ac1c69ab 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_invalid.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/atomic_invalid.c @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ -#define __INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(op) \ +#define __INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(op) \ { \ - "atomic " #op " access through non-pointer ", \ + "atomic " #op " access through non-pointer ", \ .insns = { \ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), \ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0), \ @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), \ }, \ .result = REJECT, \ - .errstr = "R1 invalid mem access 'inv'" \ + .errstr = "R1 invalid mem access 'scalar'" \ } __INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_ADD), __INVALID_ATOMIC_ACCESS_TEST(BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index e061e8799ce2..33125d5f6772 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -508,7 +508,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT }, @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c index 829be2b9e08e..f890333259ad 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c @@ -97,6 +97,25 @@ }, }, { + "calls: trigger reg2btf_ids[reg->type] for reg->type > __BPF_REG_TYPE_MAX", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL, 0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "arg#0 pointer type STRUCT prog_test_ref_kfunc must point", + .fixup_kfunc_btf_id = { + { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_acquire", 3 }, + { "bpf_kfunc_call_test_release", 5 }, + }, +}, +{ "calls: basic sanity", .insns = { BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 2), @@ -169,7 +188,7 @@ }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", }, { "calls: multiple ret types in subprog 2", @@ -472,7 +491,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R6 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R6 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, @@ -1678,7 +1697,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 12, 22 }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", }, { "calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx.c index 23080862aafd..60f6fbe03f19 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx.c @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR, .expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=ctx", + .errstr = "R1 type=scalar expected=ctx", }, { "pass ctx or null check, 4: ctx - const", @@ -193,5 +193,5 @@ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK, .expected_attach_type = BPF_CGROUP_INET4_POST_BIND, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=ctx", + .errstr = "R1 type=scalar expected=ctx", }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c index ac1e19d0f520..11acd1855acf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R2 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c index 0ab7f1dfc97a..a6c869a7319c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/helper_access_var_len.c @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_csum_diff), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=fp", + .errstr = "R1 type=scalar expected=fp", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=fp", + .errstr = "R1 type=scalar expected=fp", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_probe_read_kernel), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=fp", + .errstr = "R1 type=scalar expected=fp", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c index 1c857b2fbdf0..6ddc418fdfaf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/jmp32.c @@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, @@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, @@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, @@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, @@ -776,7 +776,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c index 6dc8003ffc70..9e754423fa8b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 1), /* R2=inv(umin=1, umax=8) */ + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 1), /* R2=scalar(umin=1, umax=8) */ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_FP), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLT, BPF_REG_2, 8, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 1), /* R2=inv(umin=1, umax=8) */ + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 1), /* R2=scalar(umin=1, umax=8) */ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_FP), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -8), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c index cc8e8c3cdc03..eb5ed936580b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/raw_stack.c @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R3 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R3 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c index 3b6ee009c00b..fbd682520e47 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ref_tracking.c @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, - .errstr = "type=inv expected=sock", + .errstr = "type=scalar expected=sock", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, - .errstr = "type=inv expected=sock", + .errstr = "type=scalar expected=sock", .result = REJECT, }, { @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, - .errstr = "type=inv expected=sock", + .errstr = "type=scalar expected=sock", .result = REJECT, }, { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c index 682519769fe3..68b14fdfebdb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/search_pruning.c @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3 }, - .errstr = "R6 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R6 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result = REJECT, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c index 8c224eac93df..86b24cad27a7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/sock.c @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ .fixup_sk_storage_map = { 11 }, .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R3 type=inv expected=fp", + .errstr = "R3 type=scalar expected=fp", }, { "sk_storage_get(map, skb->sk, &stack_value, 1): stack_value", diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c index 8cfc5349d2a8..e23f07175e1b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spill_fill.c @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .errstr_unpriv = "attempt to corrupt spilled", - .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, @@ -147,11 +147,11 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8), /* r0 = r2 */ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), - /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv20 */ + /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=20 */ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_4), - /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,off=20 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv20 */ + /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,off=20 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=20 */ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), - /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,off=20,r=20 R2=pkt,r=20 R3=pkt_end R4=inv20 */ + /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,off=20,r=20 R2=pkt,r=20 R3=pkt_end R4=20 */ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), @@ -190,11 +190,11 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8), /* r0 = r2 */ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), - /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv,umax=65535 */ + /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=65535 */ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_4), - /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv,umax=65535 */ + /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=65535 */ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), - /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv20 */ + /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=20 */ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), @@ -222,11 +222,11 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8), /* r0 = r2 */ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), - /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv,umax=65535 */ + /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=65535 */ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_4), - /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv,umax=65535 */ + /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=65535 */ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), - /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv20 */ + /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=20 */ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), @@ -250,11 +250,11 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -6), /* r0 = r2 */ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), - /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv,umax=65535 */ + /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=65535 */ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_4), - /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv,umax=65535 */ + /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=65535 */ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), - /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv20 */ + /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=20 */ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), @@ -280,11 +280,11 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -4), /* r0 = r2 */ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), - /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv,umax=U32_MAX */ + /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=U32_MAX */ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_4), - /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,umax=U32_MAX R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv */ + /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,umax=U32_MAX R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4= */ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1), - /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,umax=U32_MAX R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=inv */ + /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,umax=U32_MAX R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4= */ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), @@ -305,13 +305,13 @@ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JLE, BPF_REG_4, 40, 2), BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), - /* *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r4 R4=inv,umax=40 */ + /* *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r4 R4=umax=40 */ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_4, -8), /* r4 = (*u32 *)(r10 - 8) */ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_10, -8), - /* r2 += r4 R2=pkt R4=inv,umax=40 */ + /* r2 += r4 R2=pkt R4=umax=40 */ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_4), - /* r0 = r2 R2=pkt,umax=40 R4=inv,umax=40 */ + /* r0 = r2 R2=pkt,umax=40 R4=umax=40 */ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), /* r2 += 20 R0=pkt,umax=40 R2=pkt,umax=40 */ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 20), diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c index 111801aea5e3..878ca26c3f0a 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/unpriv.c @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R1 type=inv expected=ctx", + .errstr = "R1 type=scalar expected=ctx", .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, }, { @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_7, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .errstr_unpriv = "R7 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R7 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 0, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c index 489062867218..d6f29eb4bd57 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_illegal_alu.c @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 }, .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic prohibited", - .errstr = "invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result = REJECT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ }, .fixup_map_hash_48b = { 3 }, .errstr_unpriv = "leaking pointer from stack off -8", - .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result = REJECT, .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS, }, diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c index 359f3e8f8b60..249187d3c530 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_ptr_arith.c @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .result_unpriv = REJECT, - .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr_unpriv = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .retval = 0, }, { @@ -1074,7 +1074,7 @@ }, .fixup_map_array_48b = { 3 }, .result = REJECT, - .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer -= pointer prohibited", }, { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c index eab1f7f56e2f..187c6f6e32bc 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ * write might have overwritten the spilled pointer (i.e. we lose track * of the spilled register when we analyze the write). */ - .errstr = "R2 invalid mem access 'inv'", + .errstr = "R2 invalid mem access 'scalar'", .result = REJECT, }, { |