diff options
| author |   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> | 2020-03-30 14:38:21 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2020-03-30 15:00:31 -0700 |
| commit | 41f70fe0649dddf02046315dc566e06da5a2dc91 (patch) | |
| tree | 891b4fa11cdd0212fe9f094af6d6a1e70cc679f9 /tools/testing/selftests | |
| parent | bpf: Test_verifier, #65 error message updates for trunc of boundary-cross (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-41f70fe0649dddf02046315dc566e06da5a2dc91.tar.xz linux-dev-41f70fe0649dddf02046315dc566e06da5a2dc91.zip | |
bpf: Test_verifier, add alu32 bounds tracking tests
Its possible to have divergent ALU32 and ALU64 bounds when using JMP32
instructins and ALU64 arithmatic operations. Sometimes the clang will
even generate this code. Because the case is a bit tricky lets add
a specific test for it.
Here is pseudocode asm version to illustrate the idea,
1 r0 = 0xffffffff00000001;
2 if w0 > 1 goto %l[fail];
3 r0 += 1
5 if w0 > 2 goto %l[fail]
6 exit
The intent here is the verifier will fail the load if the 32bit bounds
are not tracked correctly through ALU64 op. Similarly we can check the
64bit bounds are correctly zero extended after ALU32 ops.
1 r0 = 0xffffffff00000001;
2 w0 += 1
2 if r0 > 3 goto %l[fail];
6 exit
The above will fail if we do not correctly zero extend 64bit bounds
after 32bit op.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560430155.10843.514209255758200922.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c | 39 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c index cf72fcc5ced0..4d0d09574bf4 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/bounds.c @@ -500,3 +500,42 @@ .errstr = "map_value pointer and 1000000000000", .result = REJECT }, +{ + "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test1", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), + /* r1 = 0xffffFFFF00000001 */ + BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, 1, 3), + /* check ALU64 op keeps 32bit bounds */ + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), + BPF_JMP32_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, 2, 1), + BPF_JMP_A(1), + /* invalid ldx if bounds are lost above */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT +}, +{ + "bounds check mixed 32bit and 64bit arithmatic. test2", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, -1), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_1, 32), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), + /* r1 = 0xffffFFFF00000001 */ + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 3), + /* r1 = 0x2 */ + BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 1), + /* check ALU32 op zero extends 64bit bounds */ + BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2, 1), + BPF_JMP_A(1), + /* invalid ldx if bounds are lost above */ + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, -1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .result = ACCEPT +}, |