diff options
| author |   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2019-01-05 21:32:39 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2019-01-05 21:32:39 -0800 |
| commit | 97274b6126193cca2b820579f5d758589a2badc2 (patch) | |
| tree | 576851fb11b2246f784da4ef3716fd441037ceaf /tools/testing | |
| parent | Merge branch 'udpv6_sendmsg-addr_any-fix' (diff) | |
| parent | bpf: add various test cases for alu op on mixed dst register types (diff) | |
| download | linux-dev-97274b6126193cca2b820579f5d758589a2badc2.tar.xz linux-dev-97274b6126193cca2b820579f5d758589a2badc2.zip | |
Merge branch 'reject-ptr-scalar-mix'
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
Follow-up fix to 979d63d50c0c ("bpf: prevent out of bounds speculation
on pointer arithmetic") in order to reject a corner case for sanitation
when ptr / scalars are mixed in the same alu op.
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 120 |
1 files changed, 120 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 10d44446e801..2fd90d456892 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -6934,6 +6934,126 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .retval = 1, }, { + "map access: mixing value pointer and scalar, 1", + .insns = { + // load map value pointer into r0 and r2 + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_ARG1, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -16), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -16, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + // load some number from the map into r1 + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), + // depending on r1, branch: + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 3), + // branch A + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + BPF_JMP_A(2), + // branch B + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0x100000), + // common instruction + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3), + // depending on r1, branch: + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1), + // branch A + BPF_JMP_A(4), + // branch B + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x13371337), + // verifier follows fall-through + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_2, 0x100000, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + // fake-dead code; targeted from branch A to + // prevent dead code sanitization + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different pointers or scalars", + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "map access: mixing value pointer and scalar, 2", + .insns = { + // load map value pointer into r0 and r2 + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_ARG1, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -16), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -16, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + // load some number from the map into r1 + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), + // depending on r1, branch: + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 3), + // branch A + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0x100000), + BPF_JMP_A(2), + // branch B + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0), + // common instruction + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3), + // depending on r1, branch: + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1), + // branch A + BPF_JMP_A(4), + // branch B + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0x13371337), + // verifier follows fall-through + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_2, 0x100000, 2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + // fake-dead code; targeted from branch A to + // prevent dead code sanitization + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "R2 tried to add from different maps or paths", + .retval = 0, + }, + { + "sanitation: alu with different scalars", + .insns = { + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_ARG1, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_ARG2, BPF_REG_FP), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_ARG2, -16), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, -16, 0), + BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 3), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0x100000), + BPF_JMP_A(2), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 42), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0x100001), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_map_array_48b = { 1 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 0x100000, + }, + { "map access: value_ptr += known scalar, upper oob arith, test 1", .insns = { BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), |