diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 16 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 437 |
3 files changed, 305 insertions, 156 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c index 3d3dcac1c942..a8c7615546a9 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/verifier.c @@ -76,9 +76,9 @@ nfp_bpf_goto_meta(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta, static int nfp_bpf_check_exit(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, - const struct bpf_verifier_env *env) + struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg0 = &env->cur_state.regs[0]; + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg0 = cur_regs(env) + BPF_REG_0; u64 imm; if (nfp_prog->act == NN_ACT_XDP) @@ -144,9 +144,9 @@ nfp_bpf_check_stack_access(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, static int nfp_bpf_check_ptr(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct nfp_insn_meta *meta, - const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u8 reg_no) + struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u8 reg_no) { - const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &env->cur_state.regs[reg_no]; + const struct bpf_reg_state *reg = cur_regs(env) + reg_no; int err; if (reg->type != PTR_TO_CTX && diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index feeaea93d959..3b0976aaac75 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -88,14 +88,19 @@ enum bpf_stack_slot_type { #define BPF_REG_SIZE 8 /* size of eBPF register in bytes */ +struct bpf_stack_state { + struct bpf_reg_state spilled_ptr; + u8 slot_type[BPF_REG_SIZE]; +}; + /* state of the program: * type of all registers and stack info */ struct bpf_verifier_state { struct bpf_reg_state regs[MAX_BPF_REG]; - u8 stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK]; - struct bpf_reg_state spilled_regs[MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE]; struct bpf_verifier_state *parent; + int allocated_stack; + struct bpf_stack_state *stack; }; /* linked list of verifier states used to prune search */ @@ -145,7 +150,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env { struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *head; /* stack of verifier states to be processed */ int stack_size; /* number of states to be processed */ bool strict_alignment; /* perform strict pointer alignment checks */ - struct bpf_verifier_state cur_state; /* current verifier state */ + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur_state; /* current verifier state */ struct bpf_verifier_state_list **explored_states; /* search pruning optimization */ const struct bpf_ext_analyzer_ops *analyzer_ops; /* external analyzer ops */ void *analyzer_priv; /* pointer to external analyzer's private data */ @@ -159,6 +164,11 @@ struct bpf_verifier_env { struct bpf_verifer_log log; }; +static inline struct bpf_reg_state *cur_regs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) +{ + return env->cur_state->regs; +} + int bpf_analyzer(struct bpf_prog *prog, const struct bpf_ext_analyzer_ops *ops, void *priv); diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index d906775e12c1..5f26f7ad124f 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -276,43 +276,132 @@ static void print_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, verbose(env, ")"); } } - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_SPILL) - verbose(env, " fp%d=%s", -MAX_BPF_STACK + i, - reg_type_str[state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE].type]); + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) + verbose(env, " fp%d=%s", + -MAX_BPF_STACK + i * BPF_REG_SIZE, + reg_type_str[state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.type]); } verbose(env, "\n"); } -static int pop_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *prev_insn_idx) +static int copy_stack_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *src) { - struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem; - int insn_idx; + if (!src->stack) + return 0; + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(dst->allocated_stack < src->allocated_stack)) { + /* internal bug, make state invalid to reject the program */ + memset(dst, 0, sizeof(*dst)); + return -EFAULT; + } + memcpy(dst->stack, src->stack, + sizeof(*src->stack) * (src->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE)); + return 0; +} + +/* do_check() starts with zero-sized stack in struct bpf_verifier_state to + * make it consume minimal amount of memory. check_stack_write() access from + * the program calls into realloc_verifier_state() to grow the stack size. + * Note there is a non-zero 'parent' pointer inside bpf_verifier_state + * which this function copies over. It points to previous bpf_verifier_state + * which is never reallocated + */ +static int realloc_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int size, + bool copy_old) +{ + u32 old_size = state->allocated_stack; + struct bpf_stack_state *new_stack; + int slot = size / BPF_REG_SIZE; + + if (size <= old_size || !size) { + if (copy_old) + return 0; + state->allocated_stack = slot * BPF_REG_SIZE; + if (!size && old_size) { + kfree(state->stack); + state->stack = NULL; + } + return 0; + } + new_stack = kmalloc_array(slot, sizeof(struct bpf_stack_state), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!new_stack) + return -ENOMEM; + if (copy_old) { + if (state->stack) + memcpy(new_stack, state->stack, + sizeof(*new_stack) * (old_size / BPF_REG_SIZE)); + memset(new_stack + old_size / BPF_REG_SIZE, 0, + sizeof(*new_stack) * (size - old_size) / BPF_REG_SIZE); + } + state->allocated_stack = slot * BPF_REG_SIZE; + kfree(state->stack); + state->stack = new_stack; + return 0; +} + +static void free_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *state) +{ + kfree(state->stack); + kfree(state); +} + +/* copy verifier state from src to dst growing dst stack space + * when necessary to accommodate larger src stack + */ +static int copy_verifier_state(struct bpf_verifier_state *dst, + const struct bpf_verifier_state *src) +{ + int err; + + err = realloc_verifier_state(dst, src->allocated_stack, false); + if (err) + return err; + memcpy(dst, src, offsetof(struct bpf_verifier_state, allocated_stack)); + return copy_stack_state(dst, src); +} + +static int pop_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *prev_insn_idx, + int *insn_idx) +{ + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem, *head = env->head; + int err; if (env->head == NULL) - return -1; + return -ENOENT; - memcpy(&env->cur_state, &env->head->st, sizeof(env->cur_state)); - insn_idx = env->head->insn_idx; + if (cur) { + err = copy_verifier_state(cur, &head->st); + if (err) + return err; + } + if (insn_idx) + *insn_idx = head->insn_idx; if (prev_insn_idx) - *prev_insn_idx = env->head->prev_insn_idx; - elem = env->head->next; - kfree(env->head); + *prev_insn_idx = head->prev_insn_idx; + elem = head->next; + kfree(head); env->head = elem; env->stack_size--; - return insn_idx; + return 0; } static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, int prev_insn_idx) { + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem *elem; + int err; - elem = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem), GFP_KERNEL); + elem = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_stack_elem), GFP_KERNEL); if (!elem) goto err; - memcpy(&elem->st, &env->cur_state, sizeof(env->cur_state)); + err = copy_verifier_state(&elem->st, cur); + if (err) + return NULL; elem->insn_idx = insn_idx; elem->prev_insn_idx = prev_insn_idx; elem->next = env->head; @@ -325,7 +414,7 @@ static struct bpf_verifier_state *push_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return &elem->st; err: /* pop all elements and return */ - while (pop_stack(env, NULL) >= 0); + while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL)); return NULL; } @@ -550,7 +639,7 @@ static void mark_reg_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno) static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, enum reg_arg_type t) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state->regs; if (regno >= MAX_BPF_REG) { verbose(env, "R%d is invalid\n", regno); @@ -563,7 +652,7 @@ static int check_reg_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, verbose(env, "R%d !read_ok\n", regno); return -EACCES; } - mark_reg_read(&env->cur_state, regno); + mark_reg_read(env->cur_state, regno); } else { /* check whether register used as dest operand can be written to */ if (regno == BPF_REG_FP) { @@ -601,10 +690,21 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, int value_regno) { - int i, spi = (MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE; + int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE, err; + + err = realloc_verifier_state(state, round_up(slot + 1, BPF_REG_SIZE), + true); + if (err) + return err; /* caller checked that off % size == 0 and -MAX_BPF_STACK <= off < 0, * so it's aligned access and [off, off + size) are within stack limits */ + if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks && + state->stack[spi].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL && + size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { + verbose(env, "attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack\n"); + return -EACCES; + } if (value_regno >= 0 && is_spillable_regtype(state->regs[value_regno].type)) { @@ -616,17 +716,18 @@ static int check_stack_write(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } /* save register state */ - state->spilled_regs[spi] = state->regs[value_regno]; - state->spilled_regs[spi].live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = state->regs[value_regno]; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) - state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_SPILL; + state->stack[spi].slot_type[i] = STACK_SPILL; } else { /* regular write of data into stack */ - state->spilled_regs[spi] = (struct bpf_reg_state) {}; + state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr = (struct bpf_reg_state) {}; for (i = 0; i < size; i++) - state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] = STACK_MISC; + state->stack[spi].slot_type[(slot - i) % BPF_REG_SIZE] = + STACK_MISC; } return 0; } @@ -637,10 +738,10 @@ static void mark_stack_slot_read(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int slo while (parent) { /* if read wasn't screened by an earlier write ... */ - if (state->spilled_regs[slot].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) + if (state->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN) break; /* ... then we depend on parent's value */ - parent->spilled_regs[slot].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + parent->stack[slot].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; state = parent; parent = state->parent; } @@ -650,34 +751,37 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_verifier_state *state, int off, int size, int value_regno) { - u8 *slot_type; - int i, spi; + int i, slot = -off - 1, spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE; + u8 *stype; - slot_type = &state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off]; + if (state->allocated_stack <= slot) { + verbose(env, "invalid read from stack off %d+0 size %d\n", + off, size); + return -EACCES; + } + stype = state->stack[spi].slot_type; - if (slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) { + if (stype[0] == STACK_SPILL) { if (size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { verbose(env, "invalid size of register spill\n"); return -EACCES; } for (i = 1; i < BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) { + if (stype[(slot - i) % BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL) { verbose(env, "corrupted spill memory\n"); return -EACCES; } } - spi = (MAX_BPF_STACK + off) / BPF_REG_SIZE; - if (value_regno >= 0) { /* restore register state from stack */ - state->regs[value_regno] = state->spilled_regs[spi]; + state->regs[value_regno] = state->stack[spi].spilled_ptr; mark_stack_slot_read(state, spi); } return 0; } else { for (i = 0; i < size; i++) { - if (slot_type[i] != STACK_MISC) { + if (stype[(slot - i) % BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_MISC) { verbose(env, "invalid read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n", off, i, size); return -EACCES; @@ -694,7 +798,8 @@ static int check_stack_read(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int __check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, int size) { - struct bpf_map *map = env->cur_state.regs[regno].map_ptr; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); + struct bpf_map *map = regs[regno].map_ptr; if (off < 0 || size <= 0 || off + size > map->value_size) { verbose(env, "invalid access to map value, value_size=%d off=%d size=%d\n", @@ -706,9 +811,9 @@ static int __check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, /* check read/write into a map element with possible variable offset */ static int check_map_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, - int off, int size) + int off, int size) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno]; int err; @@ -783,7 +888,7 @@ static bool may_access_direct_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int __check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, int size) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno]; if (off < 0 || size <= 0 || (u64)off + size > reg->range) { @@ -797,7 +902,7 @@ static int __check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, static int check_packet_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off, int size) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); struct bpf_reg_state *reg = ®s[regno]; int err; @@ -866,7 +971,7 @@ static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, static bool is_pointer_value(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno) { - return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, &env->cur_state.regs[regno]); + return __is_pointer_value(env->allow_ptr_leaks, cur_regs(env) + regno); } static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, @@ -968,8 +1073,9 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn int bpf_size, enum bpf_access_type t, int value_regno) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; - struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &state->regs[regno]; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); + struct bpf_reg_state *reg = regs + regno; int size, err = 0; size = bpf_size_to_bytes(bpf_size); @@ -993,7 +1099,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn err = check_map_access(env, regno, off, size); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) - mark_reg_unknown(env, state->regs, value_regno); + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_CTX) { enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = SCALAR_VALUE; @@ -1028,14 +1134,14 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn * case, we know the offset is zero. */ if (reg_type == SCALAR_VALUE) - mark_reg_unknown(env, state->regs, value_regno); + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); else - mark_reg_known_zero(env, state->regs, + mark_reg_known_zero(env, regs, value_regno); - state->regs[value_regno].id = 0; - state->regs[value_regno].off = 0; - state->regs[value_regno].range = 0; - state->regs[value_regno].type = reg_type; + regs[value_regno].id = 0; + regs[value_regno].off = 0; + regs[value_regno].range = 0; + regs[value_regno].type = reg_type; } } else if (reg->type == PTR_TO_STACK) { @@ -1061,19 +1167,12 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn if (env->prog->aux->stack_depth < -off) env->prog->aux->stack_depth = -off; - if (t == BPF_WRITE) { - if (!env->allow_ptr_leaks && - state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off] == STACK_SPILL && - size != BPF_REG_SIZE) { - verbose(env, "attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack\n"); - return -EACCES; - } + if (t == BPF_WRITE) err = check_stack_write(env, state, off, size, value_regno); - } else { + else err = check_stack_read(env, state, off, size, value_regno); - } } else if (reg_is_pkt_pointer(reg)) { if (t == BPF_WRITE && !may_access_direct_pkt_data(env, NULL, t)) { verbose(env, "cannot write into packet\n"); @@ -1087,7 +1186,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn } err = check_packet_access(env, regno, off, size); if (!err && t == BPF_READ && value_regno >= 0) - mark_reg_unknown(env, state->regs, value_regno); + mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno); } else { verbose(env, "R%d invalid mem access '%s'\n", regno, reg_type_str[reg->type]); @@ -1095,11 +1194,11 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn } if (!err && size < BPF_REG_SIZE && value_regno >= 0 && t == BPF_READ && - state->regs[value_regno].type == SCALAR_VALUE) { + regs[value_regno].type == SCALAR_VALUE) { /* b/h/w load zero-extends, mark upper bits as known 0 */ - state->regs[value_regno].var_off = tnum_cast( - state->regs[value_regno].var_off, size); - __update_reg_bounds(&state->regs[value_regno]); + regs[value_regno].var_off = + tnum_cast(regs[value_regno].var_off, size); + __update_reg_bounds(®s[value_regno]); } return err; } @@ -1156,9 +1255,9 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; - int off, i; + int off, i, slot, spi; if (regs[regno].type != PTR_TO_STACK) { /* Allow zero-byte read from NULL, regardless of pointer type */ @@ -1198,7 +1297,11 @@ static int check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, } for (i = 0; i < access_size; i++) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[MAX_BPF_STACK + off + i] != STACK_MISC) { + slot = -(off + i) - 1; + spi = slot / BPF_REG_SIZE; + if (state->allocated_stack <= slot || + state->stack[spi].slot_type[slot % BPF_REG_SIZE] != + STACK_MISC) { verbose(env, "invalid indirect read from stack off %d+%d size %d\n", off, i, access_size); return -EACCES; @@ -1211,7 +1314,7 @@ static int check_helper_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *reg = ®s[regno]; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno]; switch (reg->type) { case PTR_TO_PACKET: @@ -1229,7 +1332,7 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, enum bpf_arg_type arg_type, struct bpf_call_arg_meta *meta) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *reg = ®s[regno]; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *reg = ®s[regno]; enum bpf_reg_type expected_type, type = reg->type; int err = 0; @@ -1514,7 +1617,7 @@ static int check_raw_mode(const struct bpf_func_proto *fn) */ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs, *reg; int i; @@ -1522,10 +1625,10 @@ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (reg_is_pkt_pointer_any(®s[i])) mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, i); - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE]; + reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr; if (reg_is_pkt_pointer_any(reg)) __mark_reg_unknown(reg); } @@ -1533,9 +1636,8 @@ static void clear_all_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; const struct bpf_func_proto *fn = NULL; - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs; struct bpf_call_arg_meta meta; bool changes_data; int i, err; @@ -1603,6 +1705,7 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id, int insn_idx) return err; } + regs = cur_regs(env); /* reset caller saved regs */ for (i = 0; i < CALLER_SAVED_REGS; i++) { mark_reg_not_init(env, regs, caller_saved[i]); @@ -1691,7 +1794,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg, const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *dst_reg; bool known = tnum_is_const(off_reg->var_off); s64 smin_val = off_reg->smin_value, smax_val = off_reg->smax_value, smin_ptr = ptr_reg->smin_value, smax_ptr = ptr_reg->smax_value; @@ -1703,13 +1806,13 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, dst_reg = ®s[dst]; if (WARN_ON_ONCE(known && (smin_val != smax_val))) { - print_verifier_state(env, &env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); verbose(env, "verifier internal error: known but bad sbounds\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (WARN_ON_ONCE(known && (umin_val != umax_val))) { - print_verifier_state(env, &env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); verbose(env, "verifier internal error: known but bad ubounds\n"); return -EINVAL; @@ -1890,7 +1993,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg, struct bpf_reg_state src_reg) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); bool src_known, dst_known; s64 smin_val, smax_val; @@ -2111,7 +2214,7 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs, *dst_reg, *src_reg; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env), *dst_reg, *src_reg; struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg = NULL, off_reg = {0}; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int rc; @@ -2185,12 +2288,12 @@ static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* Got here implies adding two SCALAR_VALUEs */ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ptr_reg)) { - print_verifier_state(env, &env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); verbose(env, "verifier internal error: unexpected ptr_reg\n"); return -EINVAL; } if (WARN_ON(!src_reg)) { - print_verifier_state(env, &env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, env->cur_state); verbose(env, "verifier internal error: no src_reg\n"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -2200,7 +2303,7 @@ static int adjust_reg_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, /* check validity of 32-bit and 64-bit arithmetic operations */ static int check_alu_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int err; @@ -2421,10 +2524,10 @@ static void find_good_pkt_pointers(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, /* keep the maximum range already checked */ regs[i].range = max(regs[i].range, new_range); - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - reg = &state->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE]; + reg = &state->stack[i].spilled_ptr; if (reg->type == type && reg->id == dst_reg->id) reg->range = max_t(u16, reg->range, new_range); } @@ -2674,17 +2777,17 @@ static void mark_map_regs(struct bpf_verifier_state *state, u32 regno, for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_REG; i++) mark_map_reg(regs, i, id, is_null); - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i += BPF_REG_SIZE) { - if (state->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - mark_map_reg(state->spilled_regs, i / BPF_REG_SIZE, id, is_null); + mark_map_reg(&state->stack[i].spilled_ptr, 0, id, is_null); } } static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, int *insn_idx) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch, *this_branch = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch, *this_branch = env->cur_state; struct bpf_reg_state *regs = this_branch->regs, *dst_reg; u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code); int err; @@ -2876,7 +2979,7 @@ static struct bpf_map *ld_imm64_to_map_ptr(struct bpf_insn *insn) /* verify BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction */ static int check_ld_imm(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); int err; if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) != BPF_DW) { @@ -2937,7 +3040,7 @@ static bool may_access_skb(enum bpf_prog_type type) */ static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) { - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); u8 mode = BPF_MODE(insn->code); int i, err; @@ -2999,7 +3102,7 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) return 0; } - reg = &env->cur_state.regs[BPF_REG_0]; + reg = cur_regs(env) + BPF_REG_0; if (reg->type != SCALAR_VALUE) { verbose(env, "At program exit the register R0 is not a known value (%s)\n", reg_type_str[reg->type]); @@ -3363,6 +3466,57 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_reg_state *rold, struct bpf_reg_state *rcur, return false; } +static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_state *old, + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur, + struct idpair *idmap) +{ + int i, spi; + + /* if explored stack has more populated slots than current stack + * such stacks are not equivalent + */ + if (old->allocated_stack > cur->allocated_stack) + return false; + + /* walk slots of the explored stack and ignore any additional + * slots in the current stack, since explored(safe) state + * didn't use them + */ + for (i = 0; i < old->allocated_stack; i++) { + spi = i / BPF_REG_SIZE; + + if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] == STACK_INVALID) + continue; + if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] != + cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE]) + /* Ex: old explored (safe) state has STACK_SPILL in + * this stack slot, but current has has STACK_MISC -> + * this verifier states are not equivalent, + * return false to continue verification of this path + */ + return false; + if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE) + continue; + if (old->stack[spi].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) + continue; + if (!regsafe(&old->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + &cur->stack[spi].spilled_ptr, + idmap)) + /* when explored and current stack slot are both storing + * spilled registers, check that stored pointers types + * are the same as well. + * Ex: explored safe path could have stored + * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -8} + * but current path has stored: + * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -16} + * such verifier states are not equivalent. + * return false to continue verification of this path + */ + return false; + } + return true; +} + /* compare two verifier states * * all states stored in state_list are known to be valid, since @@ -3407,37 +3561,8 @@ static bool states_equal(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, goto out_free; } - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK; i++) { - if (old->stack_slot_type[i] == STACK_INVALID) - continue; - if (old->stack_slot_type[i] != cur->stack_slot_type[i]) - /* Ex: old explored (safe) state has STACK_SPILL in - * this stack slot, but current has has STACK_MISC -> - * this verifier states are not equivalent, - * return false to continue verification of this path - */ - goto out_free; - if (i % BPF_REG_SIZE) - continue; - if (old->stack_slot_type[i] != STACK_SPILL) - continue; - if (!regsafe(&old->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE], - &cur->spilled_regs[i / BPF_REG_SIZE], - idmap)) - /* when explored and current stack slot are both storing - * spilled registers, check that stored pointers types - * are the same as well. - * Ex: explored safe path could have stored - * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -8} - * but current path has stored: - * (bpf_reg_state) {.type = PTR_TO_STACK, .off = -16} - * such verifier states are not equivalent. - * return false to continue verification of this path - */ - goto out_free; - else - continue; - } + if (!stacksafe(old, cur, idmap)) + goto out_free; ret = true; out_free: kfree(idmap); @@ -3473,17 +3598,19 @@ static bool do_propagate_liveness(const struct bpf_verifier_state *state, } } /* ... and stack slots */ - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { - if (parent->stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL) + for (i = 0; i < state->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE && + i < parent->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) { + if (parent->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - if (state->stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] != STACK_SPILL) + if (state->stack[i].slot_type[0] != STACK_SPILL) continue; - if (parent->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) + if (parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) continue; - if (writes && (state->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)) + if (writes && + (state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_WRITTEN)) continue; - if (state->spilled_regs[i].live & REG_LIVE_READ) { - parent->spilled_regs[i].live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + if (state->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live & REG_LIVE_READ) { + parent->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; touched = true; } } @@ -3513,6 +3640,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) { struct bpf_verifier_state_list *new_sl; struct bpf_verifier_state_list *sl; + struct bpf_verifier_state *cur = env->cur_state; int i; sl = env->explored_states[insn_idx]; @@ -3523,7 +3651,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) return 0; while (sl != STATE_LIST_MARK) { - if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, &env->cur_state)) { + if (states_equal(env, &sl->state, cur)) { /* reached equivalent register/stack state, * prune the search. * Registers read by the continuation are read by us. @@ -3534,7 +3662,7 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) * they'll be immediately forgotten as we're pruning * this state and will pop a new one. */ - propagate_liveness(&sl->state, &env->cur_state); + propagate_liveness(&sl->state, cur); return 1; } sl = sl->next; @@ -3546,16 +3674,16 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) * it will be rejected. Since there are no loops, we won't be * seeing this 'insn_idx' instruction again on the way to bpf_exit */ - new_sl = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list), GFP_USER); + new_sl = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state_list), GFP_KERNEL); if (!new_sl) return -ENOMEM; /* add new state to the head of linked list */ - memcpy(&new_sl->state, &env->cur_state, sizeof(env->cur_state)); + copy_verifier_state(&new_sl->state, cur); new_sl->next = env->explored_states[insn_idx]; env->explored_states[insn_idx] = new_sl; /* connect new state to parentage chain */ - env->cur_state.parent = &new_sl->state; + cur->parent = &new_sl->state; /* clear write marks in current state: the writes we did are not writes * our child did, so they don't screen off its reads from us. * (There are no read marks in current state, because reads always mark @@ -3563,10 +3691,10 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx) * explored_states can get read marks.) */ for (i = 0; i < BPF_REG_FP; i++) - env->cur_state.regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; - for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_STACK / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) - if (env->cur_state.stack_slot_type[i * BPF_REG_SIZE] == STACK_SPILL) - env->cur_state.spilled_regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + cur->regs[i].live = REG_LIVE_NONE; + for (i = 0; i < cur->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; i++) + if (cur->stack[i].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL) + cur->stack[i].spilled_ptr.live = REG_LIVE_NONE; return 0; } @@ -3581,15 +3709,19 @@ static int ext_analyzer_insn_hook(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) { - struct bpf_verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state; + struct bpf_verifier_state *state; struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi; - struct bpf_reg_state *regs = state->regs; + struct bpf_reg_state *regs; int insn_cnt = env->prog->len; int insn_idx, prev_insn_idx = 0; int insn_processed = 0; bool do_print_state = false; - init_reg_state(env, regs); + state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_verifier_state), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!state) + return -ENOMEM; + env->cur_state = state; + init_reg_state(env, state->regs); state->parent = NULL; insn_idx = 0; for (;;) { @@ -3637,7 +3769,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) else verbose(env, "\nfrom %d to %d:", prev_insn_idx, insn_idx); - print_verifier_state(env, &env->cur_state); + print_verifier_state(env, state); do_print_state = false; } @@ -3651,6 +3783,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (err) return err; + regs = cur_regs(env); if (class == BPF_ALU || class == BPF_ALU64) { err = check_alu_op(env, insn); if (err) @@ -3818,8 +3951,10 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) if (err) return err; process_bpf_exit: - insn_idx = pop_stack(env, &prev_insn_idx); - if (insn_idx < 0) { + err = pop_stack(env, &prev_insn_idx, &insn_idx); + if (err < 0) { + if (err != -ENOENT) + return err; break; } else { do_print_state = true; @@ -4359,9 +4494,11 @@ int bpf_check(struct bpf_prog **prog, union bpf_attr *attr) env->allow_ptr_leaks = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); ret = do_check(env); + free_verifier_state(env->cur_state); + env->cur_state = NULL; skip_full_check: - while (pop_stack(env, NULL) >= 0); + while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL)); free_states(env); if (ret == 0) @@ -4464,9 +4601,11 @@ int bpf_analyzer(struct bpf_prog *prog, const struct bpf_ext_analyzer_ops *ops, env->allow_ptr_leaks = capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN); ret = do_check(env); + free_verifier_state(env->cur_state); + env->cur_state = NULL; skip_full_check: - while (pop_stack(env, NULL) >= 0); + while (!pop_stack(env, NULL, NULL)); free_states(env); mutex_unlock(&bpf_verifier_lock); |