diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py')
| -rwxr-xr-x | tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py | 407 |
1 files changed, 296 insertions, 111 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py index 9c4126731457..e2cd2cc2e98f 100755 --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit_tool_test.py @@ -13,9 +13,10 @@ import tempfile, shutil # Handling test_tmpdir import itertools import json +import os import signal import subprocess -import os +from typing import Iterable import kunit_config import kunit_parser @@ -44,53 +45,39 @@ class KconfigTest(unittest.TestCase): self.assertTrue(kconfig0.is_subset_of(kconfig0)) kconfig1 = kunit_config.Kconfig() - kconfig1.add_entry(kunit_config.KconfigEntry('TEST', 'y')) + kconfig1.add_entry('TEST', 'y') self.assertTrue(kconfig1.is_subset_of(kconfig1)) self.assertTrue(kconfig0.is_subset_of(kconfig1)) self.assertFalse(kconfig1.is_subset_of(kconfig0)) def test_read_from_file(self): - kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() kconfig_path = test_data_path('test_read_from_file.kconfig') - kconfig.read_from_file(kconfig_path) + kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path) expected_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('UML', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MMU', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('TEST', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MK8', 'n')) - - self.assertEqual(kconfig.entries(), expected_kconfig.entries()) + expected_kconfig.add_entry('UML', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('MMU', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('TEST', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('MK8', 'n') + + self.assertEqual(kconfig, expected_kconfig) def test_write_to_file(self): kconfig_path = os.path.join(test_tmpdir, '.config') expected_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('UML', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MMU', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('TEST', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y')) - expected_kconfig.add_entry( - kunit_config.KconfigEntry('MK8', 'n')) + expected_kconfig.add_entry('UML', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('MMU', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('TEST', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('EXAMPLE_TEST', 'y') + expected_kconfig.add_entry('MK8', 'n') expected_kconfig.write_to_file(kconfig_path) - actual_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() - actual_kconfig.read_from_file(kconfig_path) - - self.assertEqual(actual_kconfig.entries(), - expected_kconfig.entries()) + actual_kconfig = kunit_config.parse_file(kconfig_path) + self.assertEqual(actual_kconfig, expected_kconfig) class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): @@ -179,7 +166,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): with open(empty_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) - self.assertEqual(0, len(result.test.subtests)) + self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests)) self.assertEqual( kunit_parser.TestStatus.FAILURE_TO_PARSE_TESTS, result.status) @@ -191,7 +178,10 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines( file.readlines())) - self.assertEqual(2, result.test.counts.errors) + # A missing test plan is not an error. + self.assertEqual(0, result.counts.errors) + # All tests should be accounted for. + self.assertEqual(10, result.counts.total()) self.assertEqual( kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status) @@ -201,29 +191,32 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): with open(header_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) - self.assertEqual(0, len(result.test.subtests)) + self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests)) self.assertEqual( kunit_parser.TestStatus.NO_TESTS, result.status) + def test_no_tests_no_plan(self): + no_plan_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_no_plan.log') + with open(no_plan_log) as file: + result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( + kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) + self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests[0].subtests[0].subtests)) + self.assertEqual( + kunit_parser.TestStatus.NO_TESTS, + result.subtests[0].subtests[0].status) + self.assertEqual(1, result.counts.errors) + + def test_no_kunit_output(self): crash_log = test_data_path('test_insufficient_memory.log') - print_mock = mock.patch('builtins.print').start() + print_mock = mock.patch('kunit_printer.Printer.print').start() with open(crash_log) as file: result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( kunit_parser.extract_tap_lines(file.readlines())) - print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('invalid KTAP input!')) + print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('could not find any KTAP output!')) print_mock.stop() - self.assertEqual(0, len(result.test.subtests)) - - def test_crashed_test(self): - crashed_log = test_data_path('test_is_test_passed-crash.log') - with open(crashed_log) as file: - result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests( - file.readlines()) - self.assertEqual( - kunit_parser.TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED, - result.status) + self.assertEqual(0, len(result.subtests)) def test_skipped_test(self): skipped_log = test_data_path('test_skip_tests.log') @@ -246,8 +239,8 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_ignores_hyphen(self): hyphen_log = test_data_path('test_strip_hyphen.log') - file = open(hyphen_log) - result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines()) + with open(hyphen_log) as file: + result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file.readlines()) # A skipped test does not fail the whole suite. self.assertEqual( @@ -255,10 +248,10 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): result.status) self.assertEqual( "sysctl_test", - result.test.subtests[0].name) + result.subtests[0].name) self.assertEqual( "example", - result.test.subtests[1].name) + result.subtests[1].name) file.close() @@ -269,7 +262,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual( kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status) - self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.test.subtests[0].name) + self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name) def test_ignores_multiple_prefixes(self): prefix_log = test_data_path('test_multiple_prefixes.log') @@ -278,7 +271,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual( kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status) - self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.test.subtests[0].name) + self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name) def test_prefix_mixed_kernel_output(self): mixed_prefix_log = test_data_path('test_interrupted_tap_output.log') @@ -287,7 +280,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual( kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status) - self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.test.subtests[0].name) + self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name) def test_prefix_poundsign(self): pound_log = test_data_path('test_pound_sign.log') @@ -296,7 +289,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual( kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status) - self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.test.subtests[0].name) + self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name) def test_kernel_panic_end(self): panic_log = test_data_path('test_kernel_panic_interrupt.log') @@ -305,7 +298,7 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual( kunit_parser.TestStatus.TEST_CRASHED, result.status) - self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.test.subtests[0].name) + self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name) def test_pound_no_prefix(self): pound_log = test_data_path('test_pound_no_prefix.log') @@ -314,7 +307,46 @@ class KUnitParserTest(unittest.TestCase): self.assertEqual( kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS, result.status) - self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.test.subtests[0].name) + self.assertEqual('kunit-resource-test', result.subtests[0].name) + +def line_stream_from_strs(strs: Iterable[str]) -> kunit_parser.LineStream: + return kunit_parser.LineStream(enumerate(strs, start=1)) + +class LineStreamTest(unittest.TestCase): + + def test_basic(self): + stream = line_stream_from_strs(['hello', 'world']) + + self.assertTrue(stream, msg='Should be more input') + self.assertEqual(stream.line_number(), 1) + self.assertEqual(stream.peek(), 'hello') + self.assertEqual(stream.pop(), 'hello') + + self.assertTrue(stream, msg='Should be more input') + self.assertEqual(stream.line_number(), 2) + self.assertEqual(stream.peek(), 'world') + self.assertEqual(stream.pop(), 'world') + + self.assertFalse(stream, msg='Should be no more input') + with self.assertRaisesRegex(ValueError, 'LineStream: going past EOF'): + stream.pop() + + def test_is_lazy(self): + called_times = 0 + def generator(): + nonlocal called_times + for _ in range(1,5): + called_times += 1 + yield called_times, str(called_times) + + stream = kunit_parser.LineStream(generator()) + self.assertEqual(called_times, 0) + + self.assertEqual(stream.pop(), '1') + self.assertEqual(called_times, 1) + + self.assertEqual(stream.pop(), '2') + self.assertEqual(called_times, 2) class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): @@ -324,17 +356,53 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_invalid_kunitconfig(self): with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'nonexistent.* does not exist'): - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path='/nonexistent_file') + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=['/nonexistent_file']) def test_valid_kunitconfig(self): with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile('wt') as kunitconfig: - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=kunitconfig.name) + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[kunitconfig.name]) def test_dir_kunitconfig(self): with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w'): pass - kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_path=dir) + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir]) + + def test_multiple_kunitconfig(self): + want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT', 'y') + want_kconfig.add_entry('KUNIT_TEST', 'm') + + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig') + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(other, 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=m') + pass + + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other]) + self.assertTrue(want_kconfig.is_subset_of(tree._kconfig), msg=tree._kconfig) + + + def test_multiple_kunitconfig_invalid(self): + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as dir: + other = os.path.join(dir, 'otherkunitconfig') + with open(os.path.join(dir, '.kunitconfig'), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(other, 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=m') + + with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, '(?s)Multiple values.*CONFIG_KUNIT'): + kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kunitconfig_paths=[dir, other]) + + + def test_kconfig_add(self): + want_kconfig = kunit_config.Kconfig() + want_kconfig.add_entry('NOT_REAL', 'y') + + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree('', kconfig_add=['CONFIG_NOT_REAL=y']) + self.assertTrue(want_kconfig.is_subset_of(tree._kconfig), msg=tree._kconfig) def test_invalid_arch(self): with self.assertRaisesRegex(kunit_kernel.ConfigError, 'not a valid arch, options are.*x86_64'): @@ -345,7 +413,7 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): return subprocess.Popen(['echo "hi\nbye"'], shell=True, text=True, stdout=subprocess.PIPE) with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as build_dir: - tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir, load_config=False) + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) mock.patch.object(tree._ops, 'start', side_effect=fake_start).start() with self.assertRaises(ValueError): @@ -356,6 +424,63 @@ class LinuxSourceTreeTest(unittest.TestCase): with open(kunit_kernel.get_outfile_path(build_dir), 'rt') as outfile: self.assertEqual(outfile.read(), 'hi\nbye\n', msg='Missing some output') + def test_build_reconfig_no_config(self): + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as build_dir: + with open(kunit_kernel.get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) + # Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have + # the defaults for any given architecture get in the + # way. + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations('none', None) + mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start() + + # Should generate the .config + self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[])) + mock_build_config.assert_called_once_with(build_dir, []) + + def test_build_reconfig_existing_config(self): + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as build_dir: + # Existing .config is a superset, should not touch it + with open(kunit_kernel.get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(kunit_kernel.get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(kunit_kernel.get_kconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y') + + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) + # Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have + # the defaults for any given architecture get in the + # way. + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations('none', None) + mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start() + + self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[])) + self.assertEqual(mock_build_config.call_count, 0) + + def test_build_reconfig_remove_option(self): + with tempfile.TemporaryDirectory('') as build_dir: + # We removed CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y from our .kunitconfig... + with open(kunit_kernel.get_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y') + with open(kunit_kernel.get_old_kunitconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y') + with open(kunit_kernel.get_kconfig_path(build_dir), 'w') as f: + f.write('CONFIG_KUNIT=y\nCONFIG_KUNIT_TEST=y') + + tree = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTree(build_dir) + # Stub out the source tree operations, so we don't have + # the defaults for any given architecture get in the + # way. + tree._ops = kunit_kernel.LinuxSourceTreeOperations('none', None) + mock_build_config = mock.patch.object(tree, 'build_config').start() + + # ... so we should trigger a call to build_config() + self.assertTrue(tree.build_reconfig(build_dir, make_options=[])) + mock_build_config.assert_called_once_with(build_dir, []) + # TODO: add more test cases. @@ -365,10 +490,8 @@ class KUnitJsonTest(unittest.TestCase): with open(test_data_path(log_file)) as file: test_result = kunit_parser.parse_run_tests(file) json_obj = kunit_json.get_json_result( - test_result=test_result, - def_config='kunit_defconfig', - build_dir=None, - json_path='stdout') + test=test_result, + metadata=kunit_json.Metadata()) return json.loads(json_obj) def test_failed_test_json(self): @@ -378,10 +501,16 @@ class KUnitJsonTest(unittest.TestCase): result["sub_groups"][1]["test_cases"][0]) def test_crashed_test_json(self): - result = self._json_for('test_is_test_passed-crash.log') + result = self._json_for('test_kernel_panic_interrupt.log') self.assertEqual( - {'name': 'example_simple_test', 'status': 'ERROR'}, - result["sub_groups"][1]["test_cases"][0]) + {'name': '', 'status': 'ERROR'}, + result["sub_groups"][2]["test_cases"][1]) + + def test_skipped_test_json(self): + result = self._json_for('test_skip_tests.log') + self.assertEqual( + {'name': 'example_skip_test', 'status': 'SKIP'}, + result["sub_groups"][1]["test_cases"][1]) def test_no_tests_json(self): result = self._json_for('test_is_test_passed-no_tests_run_with_header.log') @@ -403,27 +532,28 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): with open(path) as file: all_passed_log = file.readlines() - self.print_mock = mock.patch('builtins.print').start() + self.print_mock = mock.patch('kunit_printer.Printer.print').start() self.addCleanup(mock.patch.stopall) - self.linux_source_mock = mock.Mock() - self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig = mock.Mock(return_value=True) - self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=True) - self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=all_passed_log) + self.mock_linux_init = mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree').start() + self.linux_source_mock = self.mock_linux_init.return_value + self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.return_value = True + self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.return_value = True + self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.return_value = all_passed_log def test_config_passes_args_pass(self): - kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir=.kunit'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir=.kunit']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0) def test_build_passes_args_pass(self): - kunit.main(['build'], self.linux_source_mock) - self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 0) - self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, '.kunit', None) + kunit.main(['build']) + self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) + self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(kunit.get_default_jobs(), '.kunit', None) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 0) def test_exec_passes_args_pass(self): - kunit.main(['exec'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 0) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( @@ -431,7 +561,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.')) def test_run_passes_args_pass(self): - kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( @@ -441,29 +571,30 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_exec_passes_args_fail(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: - kunit.main(['exec'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec']) self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1) def test_run_passes_args_fail(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: - kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run']) self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) - self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('invalid KTAP input!')) + self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('could not find any KTAP output!')) def test_exec_no_tests(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=['TAP version 14', '1..0']) with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: - kunit.main(['run'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run']) + self.assertEqual(e.exception.code, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300) self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains(' 0 tests run!')) def test_exec_raw_output(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) - kunit.main(['exec', '--raw_output'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--raw_output']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list: self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))) @@ -471,7 +602,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_run_raw_output(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list: @@ -480,31 +611,37 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_run_raw_output_kunit(self): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=kunit'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=kunit']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.call_count, 1) for call in self.print_mock.call_args_list: self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains('Testing complete.'))) self.assertNotEqual(call, mock.call(StrContains(' 0 tests run'))) + def test_run_raw_output_invalid(self): + self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) + with self.assertRaises(SystemExit) as e: + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output=invalid']) + self.assertNotEqual(e.exception.code, 0) + def test_run_raw_output_does_not_take_positional_args(self): # --raw_output is a string flag, but we don't want it to consume # any positional arguments, only ones after an '=' self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel = mock.Mock(return_value=[]) - kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output', 'filter_glob'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--raw_output', 'filter_glob']) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='filter_glob', timeout=300) def test_exec_timeout(self): timeout = 3453 - kunit.main(['exec', '--timeout', str(timeout)], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--timeout', str(timeout)]) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout) self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.')) def test_run_timeout(self): timeout = 3453 - kunit.main(['run', '--timeout', str(timeout)], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--timeout', str(timeout)]) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=timeout) @@ -512,7 +649,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_run_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' - kunit.main(['run', '--build_dir=.kunit'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--build_dir=.kunit']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300) @@ -520,45 +657,93 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): def test_config_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' - kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['config', '--build_dir', build_dir]) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) def test_build_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' - kunit.main(['build', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock) - self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(False, 8, build_dir, None) + jobs = kunit.get_default_jobs() + kunit.main(['build', '--build_dir', build_dir]) + self.linux_source_mock.build_kernel.assert_called_once_with(jobs, build_dir, None) def test_exec_builddir(self): build_dir = '.kunit' - kunit.main(['exec', '--build_dir', build_dir], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--build_dir', build_dir]) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=None, build_dir=build_dir, filter_glob='', timeout=300) self.print_mock.assert_any_call(StrContains('Testing complete.')) - @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') - def test_run_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): - mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock + def test_run_kunitconfig(self): kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. - mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', - arch='um', - cross_compile=None, - qemu_config_path=None) + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + + def test_config_kunitconfig(self): + kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig'], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + + def test_config_alltests(self): + kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig', '--alltests']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=[kunit_kernel.ALL_TESTS_CONFIG_PATH, 'mykunitconfig'], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + @mock.patch.object(kunit_kernel, 'LinuxSourceTree') - def test_config_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): + def test_run_multiple_kunitconfig(self, mock_linux_init): mock_linux_init.return_value = self.linux_source_mock - kunit.main(['config', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig']) + kunit.main(['run', '--kunitconfig=mykunitconfig', '--kunitconfig=other']) # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', - kunitconfig_path='mykunitconfig', + kunitconfig_paths=['mykunitconfig', 'other'], + kconfig_add=None, arch='um', cross_compile=None, - qemu_config_path=None) + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + + def test_run_kconfig_add(self): + kunit.main(['run', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KASAN=y', '--kconfig_add=CONFIG_KCSAN=y']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=[], + kconfig_add=['CONFIG_KASAN=y', 'CONFIG_KCSAN=y'], + arch='um', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=[]) + + def test_run_qemu_args(self): + kunit.main(['run', '--arch=x86_64', '--qemu_args', '-m 2048']) + # Just verify that we parsed and initialized it correctly here. + self.mock_linux_init.assert_called_once_with('.kunit', + kunitconfig_paths=[], + kconfig_add=None, + arch='x86_64', + cross_compile=None, + qemu_config_path=None, + extra_qemu_args=['-m', '2048']) def test_run_kernel_args(self): - kunit.main(['run', '--kernel_args=a=1', '--kernel_args=b=2'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['run', '--kernel_args=a=1', '--kernel_args=b=2']) self.assertEqual(self.linux_source_mock.build_reconfig.call_count, 1) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_called_once_with( args=['a=1','b=2'], build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='', timeout=300) @@ -569,7 +754,7 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.return_value = ['TAP version 14', 'init: random output'] + want got = kunit._list_tests(self.linux_source_mock, - kunit.KunitExecRequest(300, '.kunit', False, 'suite*', None, 'suite')) + kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, None, '.kunit', 300, 'suite*', None, 'suite')) self.assertEqual(got, want) # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. @@ -580,11 +765,11 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): @mock.patch.object(kunit, '_list_tests') def test_run_isolated_by_suite(self, mock_tests): mock_tests.return_value = ['suite.test1', 'suite.test2', 'suite2.test1'] - kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=suite', 'suite*.test*'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=suite', 'suite*.test*']) # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. mock_tests.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY, - kunit.KunitExecRequest(300, '.kunit', False, 'suite*.test*', None, 'suite')) + kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, None, '.kunit', 300, 'suite*.test*', None, 'suite')) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_has_calls([ mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite.test*', timeout=300), mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite2.test*', timeout=300), @@ -593,11 +778,11 @@ class KUnitMainTest(unittest.TestCase): @mock.patch.object(kunit, '_list_tests') def test_run_isolated_by_test(self, mock_tests): mock_tests.return_value = ['suite.test1', 'suite.test2', 'suite2.test1'] - kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=test', 'suite*'], self.linux_source_mock) + kunit.main(['exec', '--run_isolated=test', 'suite*']) # Should respect the user's filter glob when listing tests. mock_tests.assert_called_once_with(mock.ANY, - kunit.KunitExecRequest(300, '.kunit', False, 'suite*', None, 'test')) + kunit.KunitExecRequest(None, None, '.kunit', 300, 'suite*', None, 'test')) self.linux_source_mock.run_kernel.assert_has_calls([ mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite.test1', timeout=300), mock.call(args=None, build_dir='.kunit', filter_glob='suite.test2', timeout=300), |