aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh')
-rwxr-xr-xtools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh80
1 files changed, 70 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh
index 5d9af22b360a..ba11433d17d8 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/pmtu.sh
@@ -6,6 +6,14 @@
#
# Tests currently implemented:
#
+# - pmtu_vti4_exception
+# Set up vti tunnel on top of veth, with xfrm states and policies, in two
+# namespaces with matching endpoints. Check that route exception is not
+# created if link layer MTU is not exceeded, then exceed it and check that
+# exception is created with the expected PMTU. The approach described
+# below for IPv6 doesn't apply here, because, on IPv4, administrative MTU
+# changes alone won't affect PMTU
+#
# - pmtu_vti6_exception
# Set up vti6 tunnel on top of veth, with xfrm states and policies, in two
# namespaces with matching endpoints. Check that route exception is
@@ -24,6 +32,7 @@
tests="
pmtu_vti6_exception vti6: PMTU exceptions
+ pmtu_vti4_exception vti4: PMTU exceptions
pmtu_vti4_default_mtu vti4: default MTU assignment
pmtu_vti6_default_mtu vti6: default MTU assignment"
@@ -109,15 +118,27 @@ setup_vti6() {
}
setup_xfrm() {
- ${ns_a} ip -6 xfrm state add src ${veth6_a_addr} dst ${veth6_b_addr} spi 0x1000 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel || return 1
- ${ns_a} ip -6 xfrm state add src ${veth6_b_addr} dst ${veth6_a_addr} spi 0x1001 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel
- ${ns_a} ip -6 xfrm policy add dir out mark 10 tmpl src ${veth6_a_addr} dst ${veth6_b_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
- ${ns_a} ip -6 xfrm policy add dir in mark 10 tmpl src ${veth6_b_addr} dst ${veth6_a_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
-
- ${ns_b} ip -6 xfrm state add src ${veth6_a_addr} dst ${veth6_b_addr} spi 0x1000 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel
- ${ns_b} ip -6 xfrm state add src ${veth6_b_addr} dst ${veth6_a_addr} spi 0x1001 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel
- ${ns_b} ip -6 xfrm policy add dir out mark 10 tmpl src ${veth6_b_addr} dst ${veth6_a_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
- ${ns_b} ip -6 xfrm policy add dir in mark 10 tmpl src ${veth6_a_addr} dst ${veth6_b_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
+ proto=${1}
+ veth_a_addr="${2}"
+ veth_b_addr="${3}"
+
+ ${ns_a} ip -${proto} xfrm state add src ${veth_a_addr} dst ${veth_b_addr} spi 0x1000 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel || return 1
+ ${ns_a} ip -${proto} xfrm state add src ${veth_b_addr} dst ${veth_a_addr} spi 0x1001 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel
+ ${ns_a} ip -${proto} xfrm policy add dir out mark 10 tmpl src ${veth_a_addr} dst ${veth_b_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
+ ${ns_a} ip -${proto} xfrm policy add dir in mark 10 tmpl src ${veth_b_addr} dst ${veth_a_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
+
+ ${ns_b} ip -${proto} xfrm state add src ${veth_a_addr} dst ${veth_b_addr} spi 0x1000 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel
+ ${ns_b} ip -${proto} xfrm state add src ${veth_b_addr} dst ${veth_a_addr} spi 0x1001 proto esp aead "rfc4106(gcm(aes))" 0x0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f0f 128 mode tunnel
+ ${ns_b} ip -${proto} xfrm policy add dir out mark 10 tmpl src ${veth_b_addr} dst ${veth_a_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
+ ${ns_b} ip -${proto} xfrm policy add dir in mark 10 tmpl src ${veth_a_addr} dst ${veth_b_addr} proto esp mode tunnel
+}
+
+setup_xfrm4() {
+ setup_xfrm 4 ${veth4_a_addr} ${veth4_b_addr}
+}
+
+setup_xfrm6() {
+ setup_xfrm 6 ${veth6_a_addr} ${veth6_b_addr}
}
setup() {
@@ -182,8 +203,47 @@ route_get_dst_pmtu_from_exception() {
mtu_parse "$(route_get_dst_exception "${ns_cmd}" ${dst})"
}
+test_pmtu_vti4_exception() {
+ setup namespaces veth vti4 xfrm4 || return 2
+
+ veth_mtu=1500
+ vti_mtu=$((veth_mtu - 20))
+
+ # SPI SN IV ICV pad length next header
+ esp_payload_rfc4106=$((vti_mtu - 4 - 4 - 8 - 16 - 1 - 1))
+ ping_payload=$((esp_payload_rfc4106 - 28))
+
+ mtu "${ns_a}" veth_a ${veth_mtu}
+ mtu "${ns_b}" veth_b ${veth_mtu}
+ mtu "${ns_a}" vti4_a ${vti_mtu}
+ mtu "${ns_b}" vti4_b ${vti_mtu}
+
+ # Send DF packet without exceeding link layer MTU, check that no
+ # exception is created
+ ${ns_a} ping -q -M want -i 0.1 -w 2 -s ${ping_payload} ${vti4_b_addr} > /dev/null
+ pmtu="$(route_get_dst_pmtu_from_exception "${ns_a}" ${vti4_b_addr})"
+ if [ "${pmtu}" != "" ]; then
+ err " unexpected exception created with PMTU ${pmtu} for IP payload length ${esp_payload_rfc4106}"
+ return 1
+ fi
+
+ # Now exceed link layer MTU by one byte, check that exception is created
+ ${ns_a} ping -q -M want -i 0.1 -w 2 -s $((ping_payload + 1)) ${vti4_b_addr} > /dev/null
+ pmtu="$(route_get_dst_pmtu_from_exception "${ns_a}" ${vti4_b_addr})"
+ if [ "${pmtu}" = "" ]; then
+ err " exception not created for IP payload length $((esp_payload_rfc4106 + 1))"
+ return 1
+ fi
+
+ # ...with the right PMTU value
+ if [ ${pmtu} -ne ${esp_payload_rfc4106} ]; then
+ err " wrong PMTU ${pmtu} in exception, expected: ${esp_payload_rfc4106}"
+ return 1
+ fi
+}
+
test_pmtu_vti6_exception() {
- setup namespaces veth vti6 xfrm || return 2
+ setup namespaces veth vti6 xfrm6 || return 2
fail=0
# Create route exception by exceeding link layer MTU