aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-09-24ACPI: CPPC: Disable FIE if registers in PCC regionsJeremy Linton1-4/+21
PCC regions utilize a mailbox to set/retrieve register values used by the CPPC code. This is fine as long as the operations are infrequent. With the FIE code enabled though the overhead can range from 2-11% of system CPU overhead (ex: as measured by top) on Arm based machines. So, before enabling FIE assure none of the registers used by cppc_get_perf_ctrs() are in the PCC region. Finally, add a module parameter which can override the PCC region detection at boot or module reload. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-08-25ACPI: CPPC: Add ACPI disabled check to acpi_cpc_valid()Perry Yuan1-1/+1
Make acpi_cpc_valid() check if ACPI is disabled, so that its callers don't need to check that separately. This will also cause the AMD pstate driver to refuse to load right away when ACPI is disabled. Also update the warning message in amd_pstate_init() to mention the ACPI disabled case for completeness. Signed-off-by: Perry Yuan <Perry.Yuan@amd.com> [ rjw: Subject edits, new changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-30cpufreq: CPPC: Fix unused-function warningPierre Gondois1-9/+8
Building the cppc_cpufreq driver with for arm64 with CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL=n triggers the following warnings: drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:550:12: error: ‘cppc_get_cpu_cost’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 550 | static int cppc_get_cpu_cost(struct device *cpu_dev, unsigned long KHz, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:481:12: error: ‘cppc_get_cpu_power’ defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 481 | static int cppc_get_cpu_power(struct device *cpu_dev, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Move the Energy Model related functions into specific guards. This allows to fix the warning and prevent doing extra work when the Energy Model is not present. Fixes: 740fcdc2c20e ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information") Reported-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Tested-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-30cpufreq: CPPC: Fix build error without CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIEZheng Bin1-1/+2
If CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE is not set, building fails: drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c: In function ‘populate_efficiency_class’: drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:584:2: error: ‘cppc_cpufreq_driver’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘cpufreq_driver’? cppc_cpufreq_driver.register_em = cppc_cpufreq_register_em; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ cpufreq_driver Make declare of cppc_cpufreq_driver out of CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE to fix this. Fixes: 740fcdc2c20e ("cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class information") Signed-off-by: Zheng Bin <zhengbin13@huawei.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-19cpufreq: CPPC: Enable dvfs_possible_from_any_cpuPierre Gondois1-0/+1
The communication mean of the _CPC desired performance can be PCC, System Memory, System IO, or Functional Fixed Hardware (FFH). PCC, SystemMemory and SystemIo address spaces are available from any CPU. Thus, dvfs_possible_from_any_cpu should be enabled in such case. For FFH, let the FFH implementation do smp_call_function_*() calls. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-19cpufreq: CPPC: Enable fast_switchPierre Gondois1-0/+24
The communication mean of the _CPC desired performance can be PCC, System Memory, System IO, or Functional Fixed Hardware. commit b7898fda5bc7 ("cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching") fast_switching is 'for switching CPU frequencies from interrupt context'. Writes to SystemMemory and SystemIo are fast and suitable this. This is not the case for PCC and might not be the case for FFH. Enable fast_switching for the cppc_cpufreq driver in above cases. Add cppc_allow_fast_switch() to check the desired performance register address space and set fast_switching accordingly. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-06cpufreq: CPPC: Register EM based on efficiency class informationPierre Gondois1-0/+144
Performance states and energy consumption values are not advertised in ACPI. In the GicC structure of the MADT table, the "Processor Power Efficiency Class field" (called efficiency class from now) allows to describe the relative energy efficiency of CPUs. To leverage the EM and EAS, the CPPC driver creates a set of artificial performance states and registers them in the Energy Model (EM), such as: - Every 20 capacity unit, a performance state is created. - The energy cost of each performance state gradually increases. No power value is generated as only the cost is used in the EM. During task placement, a task can raise the frequency of its whole pd. This can make EAS place a task on a pd with CPUs that are individually less energy efficient. As cost values are artificial, and to place tasks on CPUs with the lower efficiency class, a gap in cost values is generated for adjacent efficiency classes. E.g.: - efficiency class = 0, capacity is in [0-1024], so cost values are in [0: 51] (one performance state every 20 capacity unit) - efficiency class = 1, capacity is in [0-1024], cost values are in [1*gap+0: 1*gap+51]. The value of the cost gap is chosen to absorb a the energy of 4 CPUs at their maximum capacity. This means that between: 1- a pd of 4 CPUs, each of them being used at almost their full capacity. Their efficiency class is N. 2- a CPU using almost none of its capacity. Its efficiency class is N+1 EAS will choose the first option. This patch also populates the (struct cpufreq_driver).register_em callback if the valid efficiency_class ACPI values are provided. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-05-06cpufreq: CPPC: Add per_cpu efficiency_classPierre Gondois1-0/+42
In ACPI, describing power efficiency of CPUs can be done through the following arm specific field: ACPI 6.4, s5.2.12.14 'GIC CPU Interface (GICC) Structure', 'Processor Power Efficiency Class field': Describes the relative power efficiency of the associated pro- cessor. Lower efficiency class numbers are more efficient than higher ones (e.g. efficiency class 0 should be treated as more efficient than efficiency class 1). However, absolute values of this number have no meaning: 2 isn’t necessarily half as efficient as 1. The efficiency_class field is stored in the GicC structure of the ACPI MADT table and it's currently supported in Linux for arm64 only. Thus, this new functionality is introduced for arm64 only. To allow the cppc_cpufreq driver to know and preprocess the efficiency_class values of all the CPUs, add a per_cpu efficiency_class variable to store them. At least 2 different efficiency classes must be present, otherwise there is no use in creating an Energy Model. The efficiency_class values are squeezed in [0:#efficiency_class-1] while conserving the order. For instance, efficiency classes of: [111, 212, 250] will be mapped to: [0 (was 111), 1 (was 212), 2 (was 250)]. Each policy being independently registered in the driver, populating the per_cpu efficiency_class is done only once at the driver initialization. This prevents from having each policy re-searching the efficiency_class values of other CPUs. The EM will be registered in a following patch. The patch also exports acpi_cpu_get_madt_gicc() to fetch the GicC structure of the ACPI MADT table for each CPU. Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2022-02-10cpufreq: CPPC: Fix performance/frequency conversionPierre Gondois1-22/+21
CPUfreq governors request CPU frequencies using information on current CPU usage. The CPPC driver converts them to performance requests. Frequency targets are computed as: target_freq = (util / cpu_capacity) * max_freq target_freq is then clamped between [policy->min, policy->max]. The CPPC driver converts performance values to frequencies (and vice-versa) using cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz() and cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(). These functions both use two different factors depending on the range of the input value. For cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf(): - (NOMINAL_PERF / NOMINAL_FREQ) or - (LOWEST_PERF / LOWEST_FREQ) and for cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(): - (NOMINAL_FREQ / NOMINAL_PERF) or - ((NOMINAL_PERF - LOWEST_FREQ) / (NOMINAL_PERF - LOWEST_PERF)) This means: 1- the functions are not inverse for some values: (perf_to_khz(khz_to_perf(x)) != x) 2- cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(LOWEST_PERF) can sometimes give a different value from LOWEST_FREQ due to integer approximation 3- it is implied that performance and frequency are proportional (NOMINAL_FREQ / NOMINAL_PERF) == (LOWEST_PERF / LOWEST_FREQ) This patch changes the conversion functions to an affine function. This fixes the 3 points above. Suggested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Suggested-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <Pierre.Gondois@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2021-10-04cpufreq: remove useless INIT_LIST_HEAD()Han Wang1-2/+0
list cpu_data_list has been inited staticly through LIST_HEAD, so there's no need to call another INIT_LIST_HEAD. Simply remove it from cppc_cpufreq_init. Signed-off-by: Han Wang <zjuwanghan@outlook.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2021-07-01cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for frequency invarianceViresh Kumar1-13/+239
The Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE) is providing a frequency scaling correction factor that helps achieve more accurate load-tracking. Normally, this scaling factor can be obtained directly with the help of the cpufreq drivers as they know the exact frequency the hardware is running at. But that isn't the case for CPPC cpufreq driver. Another way of obtaining that is using the arch specific counter support, which is already present in kernel, but that hardware is optional for platforms. This patch updates the CPPC driver to register itself with the topology core to provide its own implementation (cppc_scale_freq_tick()) of topology_scale_freq_tick() which gets called by the scheduler on every tick. Note that the arch specific counters have higher priority than CPPC counters, if available, though the CPPC driver doesn't need to have any special handling for that. On an invocation of cppc_scale_freq_tick(), we schedule an irq work (since we reach here from hard-irq context), which then schedules a normal work item and cppc_scale_freq_workfn() updates the per_cpu arch_freq_scale variable based on the counter updates since the last tick. To allow platforms to disable this CPPC counter-based frequency invariance support, this is all done under CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE, which is enabled by default. This also exports sched_setattr_nocheck() as the CPPC driver can be built as a module. Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2021-07-01cpufreq: CPPC: Pass structure instance by referenceViresh Kumar1-8/+8
Don't pass structure instance by value, pass it by reference instead. Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2021-07-01cpufreq: CPPC: Fix potential memleak in cppc_cpufreq_cpu_initViresh Kumar1-8/+20
It's a classic example of memleak, we allocate something, we fail and never free the resources. Make sure we free all resources on policy ->init() failures. Fixes: a28b2bfc099c ("cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a list") Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2021-06-30cpufreq: CPPC: Migrate to ->exit() callback instead of ->stop_cpu()Viresh Kumar1-22/+24
Commit 367dc4aa932b ("cpufreq: Add stop CPU callback to cpufreq_driver interface") added the ->stop_cpu() callback to allow the drivers to do clean up before the CPU is completely down and its state can't be modified. At that time the CPU hotplug framework used to call the cpufreq core's registered notifier for different events like CPU_DOWN_PREPARE and CPU_POST_DEAD. The ->stop_cpu() callback was called during the CPU_DOWN_PREPARE event. This is no longer the case, cpuhp_cpufreq_offline() is called only once by the CPU hotplug core now and we don't really need two separate callbacks for cpufreq drivers, i.e. ->stop_cpu() and -<exit(), as everything can be done from the ->exit() callback itself. Migrate to using the ->exit() callback instead of ->stop_cpu(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Minor edits in the changelog and subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-06-14Revert "cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for frequency invariance"Viresh Kumar1-233/+12
This reverts commit 4c38f2df71c8e33c0b64865992d693f5022eeaad. There are few races in the frequency invariance support for CPPC driver, namely the driver doesn't stop the kthread_work and irq_work on policy exit during suspend/resume or CPU hotplug. A proper fix won't be possible for the 5.13-rc, as it requires a lot of changes. Lets revert the patch instead for now. Fixes: 4c38f2df71c8 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for frequency invariance") Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2021-03-22cpufreq: cppc: simplify default delay_us settingTom Saeger1-12/+2
Simplify case when setting default in cppc_cpufreq_get_transition_delay_us. Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger <tom.saeger@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2021-03-22cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for frequency invarianceViresh Kumar1-12/+233
The Frequency Invariance Engine (FIE) is providing a frequency scaling correction factor that helps achieve more accurate load-tracking. Normally, this scaling factor can be obtained directly with the help of the cpufreq drivers as they know the exact frequency the hardware is running at. But that isn't the case for CPPC cpufreq driver. Another way of obtaining that is using the arch specific counter support, which is already present in kernel, but that hardware is optional for platforms. This patch updates the CPPC driver to register itself with the topology core to provide its own implementation (cppc_scale_freq_tick()) of topology_scale_freq_tick() which gets called by the scheduler on every tick. Note that the arch specific counters have higher priority than CPPC counters, if available, though the CPPC driver doesn't need to have any special handling for that. On an invocation of cppc_scale_freq_tick(), we schedule an irq work (since we reach here from hard-irq context), which then schedules a normal work item and cppc_scale_freq_workfn() updates the per_cpu arch_freq_scale variable based on the counter updates since the last tick. To allow platforms to disable this CPPC counter-based frequency invariance support, this is all done under CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE, which is enabled by default. This also exports sched_setattr_nocheck() as the CPPC driver can be built as a module. Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-12-15cppc_cpufreq: replace per-cpu data array with a listIonela Voinescu1-83/+91
The cppc_cpudata per-cpu storage was inefficient (1) additional to causing functional issues (2) when CPUs are hotplugged out, due to per-cpu data being improperly initialised. (1) The amount of information needed for CPPC performance control in its cpufreq driver depends on the domain (PSD) coordination type: ANY: One set of CPPC control and capability data (e.g desired performance, highest/lowest performance, etc) applies to all CPUs in the domain. ALL: Same as ANY. To be noted that this type is not currently supported. When supported, information about which CPUs belong to a domain is needed in order for frequency change requests to be sent to each of them. HW: It's necessary to store CPPC control and capability information for all the CPUs. HW will then coordinate the performance state based on their limitations and requests. NONE: Same as HW. No HW coordination is expected. Despite this, the previous initialisation code would indiscriminately allocate memory for all CPUs (all_cpu_data) and unnecessarily duplicate performance capabilities and the domain sharing mask and type for each possible CPU. (2) With the current per-cpu structure, when having ANY coordination, the cppc_cpudata cpu information is not initialised (will remain 0) for all CPUs in a policy, other than policy->cpu. When policy->cpu is hotplugged out, the driver will incorrectly use the uninitialised (0) value of the other CPUs when making frequency changes. Additionally, the previous values stored in the perf_ctrls.desired_perf will be lost when policy->cpu changes. Therefore replace the array of per cpu data with a list. The memory for each structure is allocated at policy init, where a single structure can be allocated per policy, not per cpu. In order to accommodate the struct list_head node in the cppc_cpudata structure, the now unused cpu and cur_policy variables are removed. For example, on a arm64 Juno platform with 6 CPUs: (0, 1, 2, 3) in PSD1, (4, 5) in PSD2 - ANY coordination, the memory allocation comparison shows: Before patch: - ANY coordination: total slack req alloc/free caller 0 0 0 0/1 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ff7810 0 0 0 0/6 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ff7808 128 80 48 1/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ffc070 768 0 768 6/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008ffc0e4 After patch: - ANY coordination: total slack req alloc/free caller 256 0 256 2/0 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008fed410 0 0 0 0/2 _kernel_size_le_hi32+0x0xffff800008fed274 Additional notes: - A pointer to the policy's cppc_cpudata is stored in policy->driver_data - Driver registration is skipped if _CPC entries are not present. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-15cppc_cpufreq: expose information on frequency domainsIonela Voinescu1-0/+14
Use the existing sysfs attribute "freqdomain_cpus" to expose information to userspace about CPUs in the same frequency domain. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-15cppc_cpufreq: clarify support for coordination typesIonela Voinescu1-7/+12
The previous coordination type handling in the cppc_cpufreq init code created some confusion: the comment mentioned "Support only SW_ANY for now" while only the SW_ALL/ALL case resulted in a failure. The other coordination types (HW_ALL/HW, NONE) were silently supported. Clarify support for coordination types while describing in comments the intended behavior. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-12-15cppc_cpufreq: use policy->cpu as driver of frequency settingIonela Voinescu1-2/+3
Considering only the currently supported coordination types (ANY, HW, NONE), this change only makes a difference for the ANY type, when policy->cpu is hotplugged out. In that case the new policy->cpu will be different from ((struct cppc_cpudata *)policy->driver_data)->cpu. While in this case the controls of *ANY* CPU could be used to drive frequency changes, it's more consistent to use policy->cpu as the leading CPU, as used in all other cppc_cpufreq functions. Additionally, the debug prints in cppc_set_perf() would no longer create confusion when referring to a CPU that is hotplugged out. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Tested-by: Mian Yousaf Kaukab <ykaukab@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-11-17cppc_cpufreq: simplify use of performance capabilitiesIonela Voinescu1-17/+23
The CPPC performance capabilities are used significantly throughout the driver. Simplify the use of them by introducing a local pointer "caps" to point to cpu_data->perf_caps, in functions that access performance capabilities often. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-11-17cppc_cpufreq: clean up cpu, cpu_num and cpunum variable useIonela Voinescu1-74/+69
In order to maintain the typical naming convention in the cpufreq framework: - replace the use of "cpu" variable name for cppc_cpudata pointers with "cpu_data" - replace variable names "cpu_num" and "cpunum" with "cpu" - make cpu variables unsigned int Where pertinent, also move the initialisation of cpu_data variable to its declaration and make consistent use of the local "cpu" variable. Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-11-17cppc_cpufreq: fix misspelling, code style and readability issuesIonela Voinescu1-16/+16
Fix a few trivial issues in the cppc_cpufreq driver: - indentation of function arguments - consistent use of tabs (vs space) in defines - spelling: s/Offest/Offset, s/trasition/transition - order of local variables, from long pointers to structures to short ret and i (index) variables, to improve readability Signed-off-by: Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-07-30cpufreq: CPPC: Reuse caps variable in few routinesXin Hao1-2/+2
The 'caps' variable has been defined in cppc_cpufreq_khz_to_perf() and cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz() routines, so there is no need to get 'highest_perf' value through 'cpu->caps.highest_perf', we can use 'caps->highest_perf' instead. Signed-off-by: Xin Hao <xhao@linux.alibaba.com> [ Viresh: Updated commit log ] Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-07-30cpufreq: cppc: Reorder code and remove apply_hisi_workaround variableViresh Kumar1-49/+42
With the current approach we have an extra check in the cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() callback, which checks if hisilicon's get rate implementation should be used instead. While it works fine, the approach isn't very straight forward, over that we have an extra check in the routine. Rearrange code and update the cpufreq driver's get() callback pointer directly for the hisilicon case. This gets the extra variable is removed and the extra check isn't required anymore as well. Tested-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2020-06-05cpufreq: CPPC: add SW BOOST supportXiongfeng Wang1-2/+37
To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we need to get the max frequency of boost mode and non-boost mode. ACPI spec 6.2 section 8.4.7.1 describes the following two CPC registers. "Highest performance is the absolute maximum performance an individual processor may reach, assuming ideal conditions. This performance level may not be sustainable for long durations, and may only be achievable if other platform components are in a specific state; for example, it may require other processors be in an idle state. Nominal Performance is the maximum sustained performance level of the processor, assuming ideal operating conditions. In absence of an external constraint (power, thermal, etc.) this is the performance level the platform is expected to be able to maintain continuously. All processors are expected to be able to sustain their nominal performance state simultaneously." To add SW BOOST support for CPPC, we can use Highest Performance as the max performance in boost mode and Nominal Performance as the max performance in non-boost mode. If the Highest Performance is greater than the Nominal Performance, we assume SW BOOST is supported. The current CPPC driver does not support SW BOOST and use 'Highest Performance' as the max performance the CPU can achieve. 'Nominal Performance' is used to convert 'performance' to 'frequency'. That means, if firmware enable boost and provide a value for Highest Performance which is greater than Nominal Performance, boost feature is enabled by default. Because SW BOOST is disabled by default, so, after this patch, boost feature is disabled by default even if boost is enabled by firmware. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2020-01-27cpufreq: Avoid creating excessively large stack framesRafael J. Wysocki1-1/+1
In the process of modifying a cpufreq policy, the cpufreq core makes a copy of it including all of the internals which is stored on the CPU stack. Because struct cpufreq_policy is relatively large, this may cause the size of the stack frame to exceed the 2 KB limit and so the GCC complains when -Wframe-larger-than= is used. In fact, it is not necessary to copy the entire policy structure in order to modify it, however. First, because cpufreq_set_policy() obtains the min and max policy limits from frequency QoS now, it is not necessary to pass the limits to it from the callers. The only things that need to be passed to it from there are the new governor pointer or (if there is a built-in governor in the driver) the "policy" value representing the governor choice. They both can be passed as individual arguments, though, so make cpufreq_set_policy() take them this way and rework its callers accordingly. This avoids making copies of cpufreq policies in the callers of cpufreq_set_policy(). Second, cpufreq_set_policy() still needs to pass the new policy data to the ->verify() callback of the cpufreq driver whose task is to sanitize the min and max policy limits. It still does not need to make a full copy of struct cpufreq_policy for this purpose, but it needs to pass a few items from it to the driver in case they are needed (different drivers have different needs in that respect and all of them have to be covered). For this reason, introduce struct cpufreq_policy_data to hold copies of the members of struct cpufreq_policy used by the existing ->verify() driver callbacks and pass a pointer to a temporary structure of that type to ->verify() (instead of passing a pointer to full struct cpufreq_policy to it). While at it, notice that intel_pstate and longrun don't really need to verify the "policy" value in struct cpufreq_policy, so drop those check from them to avoid copying "policy" into struct cpufreq_policy_data (which allows it to be slightly smaller). Also while at it fix up white space in a couple of places and make cpufreq_set_policy() static (as it can be so). Fixes: 3000ce3c52f8 ("cpufreq: Use per-policy frequency QoS") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAMuHMdX6-jb1W8uC2_237m8ctCpsnGp=JCxqt8pCWVqNXHmkVg@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: 5.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-12-29cpufreq: CPPC: put ACPI table after using itHanjun Guo1-0/+2
Put the ACPI table to release the table mapping after using it successfully. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> [ rjw: Subject & changelog ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-12-29cpufreq : CPPC: Break out if HiSilicon CPPC workaround is matchedHanjun Guo1-2/+4
Bail out if we match the OEM information, to save some possible extra iteration. Also update the code to fix minor coding style issue. Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> [ rjw: Subject ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-06-05treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 441Thomas Gleixner1-5/+1
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation version 2 of the license extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 315 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.503150771@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-02-18cpufreq / cppc: Work around for Hisilicon CPPC cpufreqXiongfeng Wang1-0/+65
Hisilicon chips do not support delivered performance counter register and reference performance counter register. But the platform can calculate the real performance using its own method. We reuse the desired performance register to store the real performance calculated by the platform. After the platform finished the frequency adjust, it gets the real performance and writes it into desired performance register. Os can use it to calculate the real frequency. Signed-off-by: Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com> [ rjw: Drop unnecessary braces ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-10-03cpufreq / CPPC: Mark acpi_ids as usedNathan Chancellor1-1/+1
Clang warns: drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c:431:36: warning: variable 'cppc_acpi_ids' is not needed and will not be emitted [-Wunneeded-internal-declaration] static const struct acpi_device_id cppc_acpi_ids[] = { ^ 1 warning generated. Mark the definition as used so that Clang understands we don't want this warning while not inhibiting Clang's dead code elimination from removing the unreferenced internal symbol when moving the data it contains to the globally available symbol via MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE. $ nm -S drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.o | grep acpi | tail -1 0000000000000000 0000000000000040 R __mod_acpi__cppc_acpi_ids_device_table Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-07-18cpufreq / CPPC: Add cpuinfo_cur_freq support for CPPCGeorge Cherian1-0/+52
Per Section 8.4.7.1.3 of ACPI 6.2, the platform provides performance feedback via set of performance counters. To determine the actual performance level delivered over time, OSPM may read a set of performance counters from the Reference Performance Counter Register and the Delivered Performance Counter Register. OSPM calculates the delivered performance over a given time period by taking a beginning and ending snapshot of both the reference and delivered performance counters, and calculating: delivered_perf = reference_perf X (delta of delivered_perf counter / delta of reference_perf counter). Implement the above and hook this up to the cpufreq->get method. Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@cavium.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-06-12treewide: kzalloc() -> kcalloc()Kees Cook1-1/+2
The kzalloc() function has a 2-factor argument form, kcalloc(). This patch replaces cases of: kzalloc(a * b, gfp) with: kcalloc(a * b, gfp) as well as handling cases of: kzalloc(a * b * c, gfp) with: kzalloc(array3_size(a, b, c), gfp) as it's slightly less ugly than: kzalloc_array(array_size(a, b), c, gfp) This does, however, attempt to ignore constant size factors like: kzalloc(4 * 1024, gfp) though any constants defined via macros get caught up in the conversion. Any factors with a sizeof() of "unsigned char", "char", and "u8" were dropped, since they're redundant. The Coccinelle script used for this was: // Fix redundant parens around sizeof(). @@ type TYPE; expression THING, E; @@ ( kzalloc( - (sizeof(TYPE)) * E + sizeof(TYPE) * E , ...) | kzalloc( - (sizeof(THING)) * E + sizeof(THING) * E , ...) ) // Drop single-byte sizes and redundant parens. @@ expression COUNT; typedef u8; typedef __u8; @@ ( kzalloc( - sizeof(u8) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(__u8) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(char) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(unsigned char) * (COUNT) + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(u8) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(__u8) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(char) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(unsigned char) * COUNT + COUNT , ...) ) // 2-factor product with sizeof(type/expression) and identifier or constant. @@ type TYPE; expression THING; identifier COUNT_ID; constant COUNT_CONST; @@ ( - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT_ID) + COUNT_ID, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT_ID + COUNT_ID, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT_CONST) + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT_CONST + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT_ID) + COUNT_ID, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT_ID + COUNT_ID, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT_CONST) + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT_CONST + COUNT_CONST, sizeof(THING) , ...) ) // 2-factor product, only identifiers. @@ identifier SIZE, COUNT; @@ - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - SIZE * COUNT + COUNT, SIZE , ...) // 3-factor product with 1 sizeof(type) or sizeof(expression), with // redundant parens removed. @@ expression THING; identifier STRIDE, COUNT; type TYPE; @@ ( kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT) * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * (COUNT) * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE) * COUNT * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(TYPE)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT) * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * (COUNT) * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT * (STRIDE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING) * COUNT * STRIDE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, sizeof(THING)) , ...) ) // 3-factor product with 2 sizeof(variable), with redundant parens removed. @@ expression THING1, THING2; identifier COUNT; type TYPE1, TYPE2; @@ ( kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(TYPE2) * COUNT + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(TYPE2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(THING2) * (COUNT) + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(TYPE2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING1) * sizeof(THING2) * COUNT + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(THING1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(THING1) * sizeof(THING2) * (COUNT) + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(THING1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(THING2) * COUNT + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) | kzalloc( - sizeof(TYPE1) * sizeof(THING2) * (COUNT) + array3_size(COUNT, sizeof(TYPE1), sizeof(THING2)) , ...) ) // 3-factor product, only identifiers, with redundant parens removed. @@ identifier STRIDE, SIZE, COUNT; @@ ( kzalloc( - (COUNT) * STRIDE * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * (STRIDE) * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * STRIDE * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - (COUNT) * (STRIDE) * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * (STRIDE) * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - (COUNT) * STRIDE * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - (COUNT) * (STRIDE) * (SIZE) + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) | kzalloc( - COUNT * STRIDE * SIZE + array3_size(COUNT, STRIDE, SIZE) , ...) ) // Any remaining multi-factor products, first at least 3-factor products, // when they're not all constants... @@ expression E1, E2, E3; constant C1, C2, C3; @@ ( kzalloc(C1 * C2 * C3, ...) | kzalloc( - (E1) * E2 * E3 + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) | kzalloc( - (E1) * (E2) * E3 + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) | kzalloc( - (E1) * (E2) * (E3) + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) | kzalloc( - E1 * E2 * E3 + array3_size(E1, E2, E3) , ...) ) // And then all remaining 2 factors products when they're not all constants, // keeping sizeof() as the second factor argument. @@ expression THING, E1, E2; type TYPE; constant C1, C2, C3; @@ ( kzalloc(sizeof(THING) * C2, ...) | kzalloc(sizeof(TYPE) * C2, ...) | kzalloc(C1 * C2 * C3, ...) | kzalloc(C1 * C2, ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * (E2) + E2, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(TYPE) * E2 + E2, sizeof(TYPE) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * (E2) + E2, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - sizeof(THING) * E2 + E2, sizeof(THING) , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - (E1) * E2 + E1, E2 , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - (E1) * (E2) + E1, E2 , ...) | - kzalloc + kcalloc ( - E1 * E2 + E1, E2 , ...) ) Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
2018-06-04Merge branches 'acpi-cppc', 'acpi-misc', 'acpi-battery' and 'acpi-ac'Rafael J. Wysocki1-12/+68
* acpi-cppc: mailbox: PCC: erroneous error message when parsing ACPI PCCT ACPI / CPPC: Fix invalid PCC channel status errors ACPI / CPPC: Document CPPC sysfs interface cpufreq / CPPC: Support for CPPC v3 ACPI / CPPC: Check for valid PCC subspace only if PCC is used ACPI / CPPC: Add support for CPPC v3 * acpi-misc: ACPI: Add missing prototype_for arch_post_acpi_subsys_init() ACPI: add missing newline to printk * acpi-battery: ACPI / battery: Add quirk to avoid checking for PMIC with native driver ACPI / battery: Ignore AC state in handle_discharging on systems where it is broken ACPI / battery: Add handling for devices which wrongly report discharging state ACPI / battery: Remove initializer for unused ident dmi_system_id ACPI / AC: Remove initializer for unused ident dmi_system_id * acpi-ac: ACPI / AC: Add quirk to avoid checking for PMIC with native driver
2018-04-30cpufreq / CPPC: Set platform specific transition_delay_usPrashanth Prakash1-2/+44
Add support to specify platform specific transition_delay_us instead of using the transition delay derived from PCC. With commit 3d41386d556d (cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latency) we are setting transition_delay_us directly and not applying the LATENCY_MULTIPLIER. Because of that, on Qualcomm Centriq we can end up with a very high rate of frequency change requests when using the schedutil governor (default rate_limit_us=10 compared to an earlier value of 10000). The PCC subspace describes the rate at which the platform can accept commands on the CPPC's PCC channel. This includes read and write command on the PCC channel that can be used for reasons other than frequency transitions. Moreover the same PCC subspace can be used by multiple freq domains and deriving transition_delay_us from it as we do now can be sub-optimal. Moreover if a platform does not use PCC for desired_perf register then there is no way to compute the transition latency or the delay_us. CPPC does not have a standard defined mechanism to get the transition rate or the latency at the moment. Given the above limitations, it is simpler to have a platform specific transition_delay_us and rely on PCC derived value only if a platform specific value is not available. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Cc: 4.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+ Fixes: 3d41386d556d (cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latency) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-24cpufreq / CPPC: Support for CPPC v3Prashanth Prakash1-12/+68
Use CPPC v3 entries to convert the abstract processor performance to processor frequency in KHz. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-10cpufreq: CPPC: Initialize shared perf capabilities of CPUsShunyong Yang1-2/+12
When multiple CPUs are related in one cpufreq policy, the first online CPU will be chosen by default to handle cpufreq operations. Let's take cpu0 and cpu1 as an example. When cpu0 is offline, policy->cpu will be shifted to cpu1. cpu1's perf capabilities should be initialized. Otherwise, perf capabilities are 0s and speed change can not take effect. This patch copies perf capabilities of the first online CPU to other shared CPUs when policy shared type is CPUFREQ_SHARED_TYPE_ANY. Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Shunyong Yang <shunyong.yang@hxt-semitech.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-10cpufreq: CPPC: Don't set transition_latencyViresh Kumar1-1/+0
Now that the driver has started to set transition_delay_us directly, there is no need to set transition_latency along with it, as it is not used by the cpufreq core. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-30cpufreq: CPPC: Use transition_delay_us depending transition_latencyGeorge Cherian1-0/+3
With commit e948bc8fbee0 (cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay value to 10 ms) the cpufreq was not honouring the delay passed via ACPI (PCCT). Due to which on ARM based platforms using CPPC the cpufreq governor tries to change the frequency of CPUs faster than expected. This leads to continuous error messages like the following. " ACPI CPPC: PCC check channel failed. Status=0 " Earlier (without above commit) the default transition delay was taken form the value passed from PCCT. Use the same value provided by PCCT to set the transition_delay_us. Fixes: e948bc8fbee0 (cpufreq: Cap the default transition delay value to 10 ms) Signed-off-by: George Cherian <george.cherian@cavium.com> Cc: 4.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.14+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-03-20cpufreq: cppc_cpufreq: Fix cppc_cpufreq_init() failure pathChunyu Hu1-2/+7
Kmemleak reported the below leak. When cppc_cpufreq_init went into failure path, the cpu mask is not freed. After fix, this report is gone. And to avaoid potential NULL pointer reference, check the cpu value first. unreferenced object 0xffff800fd5ea4880 (size 128): comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294939510 (age 668.680s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .... ........... 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [<ffff0000082c4ae4>] __kmalloc_node+0x278/0x634 [<ffff0000088f4a74>] alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x28/0x60 [<ffff0000088f4af0>] zalloc_cpumask_var+0x14/0x1c [<ffff000008d20254>] cppc_cpufreq_init+0xd0/0x19c [<ffff000008083828>] do_one_initcall+0xec/0x15c [<ffff000008cd1018>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f4/0x2a4 [<ffff0000089099b0>] kernel_init+0x18/0x10c [<ffff000008084d50>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18 [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff Signed-off-by: Chunyu Hu <chuhu@redhat.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-08-18cpufreq: remove setting of policy->cpu in policy->cpus during initSudeep Holla1-1/+0
policy->cpu is copied into policy->cpus in cpufreq_online() before calling into cpufreq_driver->init(). So there's no need to set the same in the individual driver init() functions again. This patch removes the redundant setting of policy->cpu in policy->cpus in intel_pstate and cppc drivers. Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2017-06-27cpufreq / CPPC: Initialize policy->min to lowest nonlinear performancePrakash, Prashanth1-3/+16
Description of Lowest Perfomance in ACPI 6.1 specification states: "Lowest Performance is the absolute lowest performance level of the platform. Selecting a performance level lower than the lowest nonlinear performance level may actually cause an efficiency penalty, but should reduce the instantaneous power consumption of the processor. In traditional terms, this represents the T-state range of performance levels." Set the default value of policy->min to Lowest Nonlinear Performance to avoid any potential efficiency penalty. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: Alexey Klimov <alexey.klimov@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-21cpufreq / CPPC: Add MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE for cppc_cpufreq driverPrakash, Prashanth1-0/+7
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is added so that CPPC cpufreq module can be automatically loaded when we have a acpi processor device with "ACPI0007" hid. Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-14Merge tag 'pm-extra-4.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pmLinus Torvalds1-1/+7
Pull more power management updates from Rafael Wysocki: "This includes a couple of fixes for cpufreq regressions introduced in 4.8, a rework of the intel_pstate algorithm used on Atom processors (that took some time to test) plus a fix and a couple of cleanups in that driver, a CPPC cpufreq driver fix, and a some devfreq fixes and cleanups (core and exynos-nocp). Specifics: - Fix two cpufreq regressions causing undesirable changes in behavior to appear (one in the core and one in the conservative governor) introduced during the 4.8 cycle (Aaro Koskinen, Rafael Wysocki). - Fix the way the intel_pstate driver accesses MSRs related to the hardware-managed P-states (HWP) feature during the initialization which currently is unsafe and may cause the processor to generate a general protection fault (Srinivas Pandruvada). - Rework the intel_pstate's P-state selection algorithm used on Atom processors to avoid known problems with the current one and to make the computation more straightforward, which also happens to improve performance in multiple benchmarks a bit (Rafael Wysocki). - Improve two comments in the intel_pstate driver (Rafael Wysocki). - Fix the desired performance computation in the CPPC cpufreq driver (Hoan Tran). - Fix the devfreq core to avoid printing misleading error messages in some cases (Tobias Jakobi). - Fix the error code path in devfreq_add_device() to use proper locking around list modifications (Axel Lin). - Fix a build failure and remove a couple of redundant updates of variables in the exynos-nocp devfreq driver (Axel Lin)" * tag 'pm-extra-4.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: cpufreq: CPPC: Correct desired_perf calculation cpufreq: conservative: Fix next frequency selection cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix struct pstate_adjust_policy kerneldoc cpufreq: intel_pstate: Proportional algorithm for Atom PM / devfreq: Skip status update on uninitialized previous_freq PM / devfreq: Add proper locking around list_del() PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp: Remove redundant code PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp: Select REGMAP_MMIO cpufreq: intel_pstate: Clarify comment in get_target_pstate_use_performance() cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix unsafe HWP MSR access
2016-10-13cpufreq: CPPC: Correct desired_perf calculationHoan Tran1-1/+7
The desired_perf is an abstract performance number. Its value should be in the range of [lowest perf, highest perf] of CPPC. The correct calculation is desired_perf = freq * cppc_highest_perf / cppc_dmi_max_khz And cppc_cpufreq_set_target() returns if desired_perf is exactly the same with the old perf. Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@apm.com> Reviewed-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-10-03Merge tag 'acpi-4.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pmLinus Torvalds1-7/+8
Pull ACPI updates from Rafael Wysocki: "First off, the ACPICA code in the kernel is updated to upstream revision 20160831 that brings in a few bug fixes and cleanups. In particular, it is possible to mask GPEs now (and the sysfs interface for GPE control is fixed on top of that), problems related to the table loading mechanism are fixed and all code related to FADT version 2 (which has never been part of the ACPI specification) is dropped. On the new features front, there is a new watchdog driver based on the ACPI WDAT (ACPI Watchdog Action Table), needed on some platforms to replace the iTCO watchdog that doesn't work there, and some UART devices get new definitions of built-in properties (to be accessed via the generic device properties API). Also, included is a fix for an ACPI-related PCI resorces allocation issue and a few problems in the EC driver and in the button and battery drivers are fixed. In addition to that, the ACPI CPPC library is updated to make batching of requests sent over the PCC channel possible (which reduces the PCC usage overhead substantially in some cases) and to support functional fixed hardware (FFH) type of CPPC registers access (which will allow CPPC to be used on x86 too in the future). As usual, there are some assorted fixes and cleanups too. Specifics: - Update of the ACPICA code in the kernel to upstream revision 20160831 with the following major changes: * New mechanism for GPE masking. * Fixes for issues related to the LoadTable operator and table loading. * Fixes for issues related to so-called module-level code (MLC), that is AML that doesn't belong to any methods. * Change of the return value of the _OSI method to reflect the Windows behavior. * GAS (Generic Address Structure) support fix related to 32-bit FADT addresses. * Elimination of unnecessary FADT version 2 support. * ACPI tools fixes and cleanups. From Bob Moore, Lv Zheng, and Jung-uk Kim. - ACPI sysfs interface updates to fix GPE handling (on top of the new GPE masking mechanism in ACPICA) and issues related to table loading (Lv Zheng). - New watchdog driver based on the ACPI WDAT (ACPI Watchdog Action Table), needed on some platforms to replace the iTCO watchdog that doesn't work there and related updates of the intel_pmc_ipc, i2c/i801 and MFD/lcp_ich drivers (Mika Westerberg). - Driver core fix to prevent it from leaking secondary fwnode objects during device removal (Lukas Wunner). - New definitions of built-in properties for UART in ACPI-based x86 SoC drivers and a 8250_dw driver quirk for the APM X-Gene SoC (Heikki Krogerus). - New device ID for the Vulcan SPI controller and constification of local strucures in the AMD SoC (APD) ACPI driver (Kamlakant Patel, Julia Lawall). - Fix for a bug causing the allocation of PCI resorces to fail if ACPI-enumerated child platform devices are registered below the PCI devices in question (Mika Westerberg). - Change of the default polarity for PCI legacy IRQs to high on systems booting wth ACPI on platforms with a GIC interrupt controller model fixing the discrepancy between the specification and HW behavior (Lorenzo Pieralisi). - Fixes for the handling of system suspend/resume in the ACPI EC driver and update of that driver to make it cope with the cases when the EC device defined in the ECDT has to be used throughout the entire system life cycle (Lv Zheng). - Update of the ACPI CPPC library to allow it to batch requests sent over the PCC channel (to reduce overhead), to support the fixed functional hardware (FFH) CPPC registers access type, to notify the mailbox framework about TX completions when the interrupt flag is set for the PCC mailbox, and to support HW-Reduced Communication Subspace type 2 (Ashwin Chaugule, Prashanth Prakash, Srinivas Pandruvada, Hoan Tran). - ACPI button driver fix and documentation update related to the handling of laptop lids (Lv Zheng). - ACPI battery driver initialization fix (Carlos Garnacho). - ACPI GPIO enumeration documentation update (Mika Westerberg). - Assorted updates of the core ACPI bus type code (Lukas Wunner, Lv Zheng). - Assorted cleanups of the ACPI table parsing code and the x86-specific ACPI code (Al Stone). - Fixes for assorted ACPI-related issues found in linux-next (Wei Yongjun)" * tag 'acpi-4.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm: (98 commits) ACPI / documentation: Use recommended name in GPIO property names watchdog: wdat_wdt: Fix warning for using 0 as NULL watchdog: wdat_wdt: fix return value check in wdat_wdt_probe() platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists i2c: i801: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists mfd: lpc_ich: Do not create iTCO watchdog when WDAT table exists ACPI / bus: Adjust ACPI subsystem initialization for new table loading mode ACPICA: Parser: Fix a regression in LoadTable support ACPICA: Tables: Fix "UNLOAD" code path lock issues ACPI / watchdog: Add support for WDAT hardware watchdog ACPI / platform: Pay attention to parent device's resources PCI: Add pci_find_resource() ACPI / CPPC: Support PCC with interrupt flag ACPI / sysfs: Update sysfs signature handling code ACPI / sysfs: Fix an issue for LoadTable opcode ACPICA: Tables: Fix a regression in acpi_tb_find_table() ACPI / tables: Remove duplicated include from tables.c ACPI / APD: constify local structures x86: ACPI: make variable names clearer in acpi_parse_madt_lapic_entries() x86: ACPI: remove extraneous white space after semicolon ...
2016-09-16cpufreq: CPPC: Avoid overflow when calculating desired_perfHoan Tran1-1/+1
This patch fixes overflow issue when calculating the desired_perf. Fixes: ad38677df44b (cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interface) Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@apm.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-09-13cpufreq: CPPC: Force reporting values in KHz to fix user space interfaceAl Stone1-4/+49
When CPPC is being used by ACPI on arm64, user space tools such as cpupower report CPU frequency values from sysfs that are incorrect. What the driver was doing was reporting the values given by ACPI tables in whatever scale was used to provide them. However, the ACPI spec defines the CPPC values as unitless abstract numbers. Internal kernel structures such as struct perf_cap, in contrast, expect these values to be in KHz. When these struct values get reported via sysfs, the user space tools also assume they are in KHz, causing them to report incorrect values (for example, reporting a CPU frequency of 1MHz when it should be 1.8GHz). The downside is that this approach has some assumptions: (1) It relies on SMBIOS3 being used, *and* that the Max Frequency value for a processor is set to a non-zero value. (2) It assumes that all processors run at the same speed, or that the CPPC values have all been scaled to reflect relative speed. This patch retrieves the largest CPU Max Frequency from a type 4 DMI record that it can find. This may not be an issue, however, as a sampling of DMI data on x86 and arm64 indicates there is often only one such record regardless. Since CPPC is relatively new, it is unclear if the ACPI ASL will always be written to reflect any sort of relative performance of processors of differing speeds. (3) It assumes that performance and frequency both scale linearly. For arm64 servers, this may be sufficient, but it does rely on firmware values being set correctly. Hence, other approaches will be considered in the future. This has been tested on three arm64 servers, with and without DMI, with and without CPPC support. Signed-off-by: Al Stone <ahs3@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>