aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/intel_lrc.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-04-24drm/i915: Move GraphicsTechnology files under gt/Chris Wilson1-1326/+0
Start partitioning off the code that talks to the hardware (GT) from the uapi layers and move the device facing code under gt/ One casualty is s/intel_ringbuffer.h/intel_engine.h/ with the plan to subdivide that header and body further (and split out the submission code from the ringbuffer and logical context handling). This patch aims to be simple motion so git can fixup inflight patches with little mess. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190424174839.7141-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-04-05drm/i915/selftests: Fix plain use of integer 0 as NULLChris Wilson1-1/+1
Quelch a sparse warning: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c:119:54: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190405111430.18495-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-04-05drm/i915/execlists: Enable coarse preemption boundaries for gen8Chris Wilson1-0/+180
When we introduced preemption, we chose to keep it disabled for gen8 as supporting preemption inside GPGPU user batches required various w/a in userspace. Since then, the desire to preempt long queues of requests between batches (e.g. within busywaiting semaphores) has grown. So allow arbitration within the busywaits and between requests, but disable arbitration within user batches so that we can preempt between requests and not risk breaking GPGPU. However, since this preemption is much coarser and doesn't interfere with userspace, we decline to include it amongst the scheduler capabilities. (This is also required for us to skip over the preemption selftests that expect to be able to preempt user batches.) Michal suggested that we could perhaps allow preemption inside gen8 userspace batches if we can satisfy ourselves that the default preemption settings are viable with existing userspace (principally OpenCL which already should carry any known workaround). We could then merge the two code paths back into one, even dropping the artifical has-preemption device feature flag. Testcase: igt/gem_exec_scheduler/semaphore-user References: beecec901790 ("drm/i915/execlists: Preemption!") Fixes: e88619646971 ("drm/i915: Use HW semaphores for inter-engine synchronisation on gen8+") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> #irc Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190329134024.5254-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-03-22drm/i915/selftests: Mark up preemption tests for hang detectionChris Wilson1-3/+35
Use the igt_live_test framework for detecting whether an unwanted hang occurred during test execution, and report failure if it does. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190321194031.20240-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-03-22drm/i915/selftests: Calculate maximum ring size for preemption chainChris Wilson1-3/+37
32 is too many for the likes of kbl, and in order to insert that many requests into the ring requires us to declare the first few hung -- understandably a slow and unexpected process. Instead, measure the size of a singe requests and use that to estimate the upper bound on the chain length we can use for our test, remembering to flush the previous chain between tests for safety. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: "Yokoyama, Caz" <caz.yokoyama@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190321194031.20240-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-03-21drm/i915: Flush pages on acquisitionChris Wilson1-4/+1
When we return pages to the system, we ensure that they are marked as being in the CPU domain since any external access is uncontrolled and we must assume the worst. This means that we need to always flush the pages on acquisition if we need to use them on the GPU, and from the beginning have used set-domain. Set-domain is overkill for the purpose as it is a general synchronisation barrier, but our intent is to only flush the pages being swapped in. If we move that flush into the pages acquisition phase, we know then that when we have obj->mm.pages, they are coherent with the GPU and need only maintain that status without resorting to heavy handed use of set-domain. The principle knock-on effect for userspace is through mmap-gtt pagefaulting. Our uAPI has always implied that the GTT mmap was async (especially as when any pagefault occurs is unpredicatable to userspace) and so userspace had to apply explicit domain control itself (set-domain). However, swapping is transparent to the kernel, and so on first fault we need to acquire the pages and make them coherent for access through the GTT. Our use of set-domain here leaks into the uABI that the first pagefault was synchronous. This is unintentional and baring a few igt should be unoticed, nevertheless we bump the uABI version for mmap-gtt to reflect the change in behaviour. Another implication of the change is that gem_create() is presumed to create an object that is coherent with the CPU and is in the CPU write domain, so a set-domain(CPU) following a gem_create() would be a minor operation that merely checked whether we could allocate all pages for the object. On applying this change, a set-domain(CPU) causes a clflush as we acquire the pages. This will have a small impact on mesa as we move the clflush here on !llc from execbuf time to create, but that should have minimal performance impact as the same clflush exists but is now done early and because of the clflush issue, userspace recycles bo and so should resist allocating fresh objects. Internally, the presumption that objects are created in the CPU write-domain and remain so through writes to obj->mm.mapping is more prevalent than I expected; but easy enough to catch and apply a manual flush. For the future, we should push the page flush from the central set_pages() into the callers so that we can more finely control when it is applied, but for now doing it one location is easier to validate, at the cost of sometimes flushing when there is no need. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190321161908.8007-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-03-08drm/i915/selftests: Check preemption support on each engineChris Wilson1-0/+18
Check that we have setup on preemption for the engine before testing, instead warn if it is not enabled on supported HW. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190306142517.22558-28-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-03-05drm/i915: Store the BIT(engine->id) as the engine's maskChris Wilson1-2/+2
In the next patch, we are introducing a broad virtual engine to encompass multiple physical engines, losing the 1:1 nature of BIT(engine->id). To reflect the broader set of engines implied by the virtual instance, lets store the full bitmask. v2: Use intel_engine_mask_t (s/ring_mask/engine_mask/) v3: Tvrtko voted for moah churn so teach everyone to not mention ring and use $class$instance throughout. v4: Comment upon the disparity in bspec for using VCS1,VCS2 in gen8 and VCS[0-4] in later gen. We opt to keep the code consistent and use 0-index naming throughout. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190305180332.30900-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-02-28drm/i915/execlists: Suppress mere WAIT preemptionChris Wilson1-0/+163
WAIT is occasionally suppressed by virtue of preempted requests being promoted to NEWCLIENT if they have not all ready received that boost. Make this consistent for all WAIT boosts that they are not allowed to preempt executing contexts and are merely granted the right to be at the front of the queue for the next execution slot. This is in keeping with the desire that the WAIT boost be a minor tweak that does not give excessive promotion to its user and open ourselves to trivial abuse. The problem with the inconsistent WAIT preemption becomes more apparent as the preemption is propagated across the engines, where one engine may preempt and the other not, and we be relying on the exact execution order being consistent across engines (e.g. using HW semaphores to coordinate parallel execution). v2: Also protect GuC submission from false preemption loops. v3: Build bug safeguards and better debug messages for st. v4: Do the priority bumping in unsubmit (i.e. on preemption/reset unwind), applying it earlier during submit causes out-of-order execution combined with execute fences. v5: Call sw_fence_fini for our dummy request (Matthew) Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190228220639.3173-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-02-20drm/i915: Beware temporary wedging when determining -EIOChris Wilson1-1/+1
At a few points in our uABI, we check to see if the driver is wedged and report -EIO back to the user in that case. However, as we perform the check and reset asynchronously (where once before they were both serialised by the struct_mutex), we may instead see the temporary wedging used to cancel inflight rendering to avoid a deadlock during reset (caused by either us timing out in our reset handler, i915_wedge_on_timeout or with malice aforethought in intel_reset_prepare for a stuck modeset). If we suspect this is the case, that is we see a wedged driver *and* reset in progress, then wait until the reset is resolved before reporting upon the wedged status. v2: might_sleep() (Mika) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109580 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190220145637.23503-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-02-05drm/i915/selftests: Exercise some AB...BA preemption chainsChris Wilson1-0/+103
Build a chain using 2 contexts (A, B) then request a preemption such that a later A request runs before the spinner in B. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190205123835.25331-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-29drm/i915/execlists: Suppress preempting selfChris Wilson1-0/+138
In order to avoid preempting ourselves, we currently refuse to schedule the tasklet if we reschedule an inflight context. However, this glosses over a few issues such as what happens after a CS completion event and we then preempt the newly executing context with itself, or if something else causes a tasklet_schedule triggering the same evaluation to preempt the active context with itself. However, when we avoid preempting ELSP[0], we still retain the preemption value as it may match a second preemption request within the same time period that we need to resolve after the next CS event. However, since we only store the maximum preemption priority seen, it may not match the subsequent event and so we should double check whether or not we actually do need to trigger a preempt-to-idle by comparing the top priorities from each queue. Later, this gives us a hook for finer control over deciding whether the preempt-to-idle is justified. The sequence of events where we end up preempting for no avail is: 1. Queue requests/contexts A, B 2. Priority boost A; no preemption as it is executing, but keep hint 3. After CS switch, B is less than hint, force preempt-to-idle 4. Resubmit B after idling v2: We can simplify a bunch of tests based on the knowledge that PI will ensure that earlier requests along the same context will have the highest priority. v3: Demonstrate the stale preemption hint with a selftest References: a2bf92e8cc16 ("drm/i915/execlists: Avoid kicking priority on the current context") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190129185452.20989-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-16drm/i915: Pull all the reset functionality together into i915_reset.cChris Wilson1-0/+2
Currently the code to reset the GPU and our state is spread widely across a few files. Pull the logic together into a common file. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190116153304.787-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-14drm/i915/selftests: Mark up rpm wakerefsChris Wilson1-10/+15
Track the temporary wakerefs used within the selftests so that leaks are clear. v2: Add a couple of coarse annotations for mock selftests as we now loudly warn about the errors. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-14-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-14drm/i915: Markup paired operations on wakerefsChris Wilson1-5/+5
The majority of runtime-pm operations are bounded and scoped within a function; these are easy to verify that the wakeref are handled correctly. We can employ the compiler to help us, and reduce the number of wakerefs tracked when debugging, by passing around cookies provided by the various rpm_get functions to their rpm_put counterpart. This makes the pairing explicit, and given the required wakeref cookie the compiler can verify that we pass an initialised value to the rpm_put (quite handy for double checking error paths). For regular builds, the compiler should be able to eliminate the unused local variables and the program growth should be minimal. Fwiw, it came out as a net improvement as gcc was able to refactor rpm_get and rpm_get_if_in_use together, v2: Just s/rpm_put/rpm_put_unchecked/ everywhere, leaving the manual mark up for smaller more targeted patches. v3: Mention the cookie in Returns Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190114142129.24398-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2019-01-02drm/i915: start moving runtime device info to a separate structJani Nikula1-2/+2
First move the low hanging fruit, the fields that are only initialized runtime. Use RUNTIME_INFO() exclusively to access the fields. Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/c24fe7a4b0492a888690c46814c0ff21ce2f12b1.1546267488.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2018-11-30drm/i915/selftests: Extract spinner codeTvrtko Ursulin1-249/+52
Pull out spinner code to a standalone file to enable it to be shortly used by other and new test cases. Plain code movement - no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181130080254.15383-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
2018-10-03drm/i915/selftests: Hold task_struct ref for smoking kthreadChris Wilson1-0/+3
As the kthread may terminate itself, the parent must hold a task_struct reference for it to call kthread_stop(). <4> [498.827675] stack segment: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI <4> [498.827683] CPU: 0 PID: 3872 Comm: drv_selftest Tainted: G U 4.19.0-rc6-CI-CI_DRM_4915+ #1 <4> [498.827686] Hardware name: Intel Corporation NUC7CJYH/NUC7JYB, BIOS JYGLKCPX.86A.0027.2018.0125.1347 01/25/2018 <4> [498.827695] RIP: 0010:kthread_stop+0x36/0x210 <4> [498.827698] Code: 05 df 3d f6 7e 89 c0 48 0f a3 05 95 f8 29 01 0f 82 56 01 00 00 f0 ff 43 20 f6 43 26 20 0f 84 7f 01 00 00 48 8b ab b0 05 00 00 <f0> 80 4d 00 02 48 89 df e8 5d ff ff ff 48 89 df e8 15 c7 00 00 48 <4> [498.827701] RSP: 0018:ffffc900003937d0 EFLAGS: 00010202 <4> [498.827704] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8802165ece40 RCX: 0000000000000001 <4> [498.827707] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000ffffffff RDI: ffffffff82247460 <4> [498.827709] RBP: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b R08: 00000000581395cb R09: 0000000000000001 <4> [498.827711] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffc90000393868 <4> [498.827713] R13: ffffc900003937f0 R14: ffff88026c068040 R15: 0000000000001057 <4> [498.827716] FS: 00007fc0c464b980(0000) GS:ffff880277e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 <4> [498.827718] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 <4> [498.827720] CR2: 000056178c2feca0 CR3: 000000026983c000 CR4: 0000000000340ef0 <4> [498.827723] Call Trace: <4> [498.827824] smoke_crescendo+0x14c/0x1d0 [i915] <4> [498.827837] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x60 <4> [498.827898] ? __i915_gem_context_pin_hw_id+0x69/0x5f0 [i915] <4> [498.827902] ? ida_alloc_range+0x1f2/0x3d0 <4> [498.827907] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x46/0x2b0 <4> [498.827914] ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x8f/0xd0 <4> [498.827979] live_preempt_smoke+0x2c2/0x470 [i915] <4> [498.828047] __i915_subtests+0x5e/0xf0 [i915] <4> [498.828113] __run_selftests+0x10b/0x190 [i915] <4> [498.828175] i915_live_selftests+0x2c/0x60 [i915] <4> [498.828232] i915_pci_probe+0x50/0xa0 [i915] <4> [498.828238] pci_device_probe+0xa1/0x130 <4> [498.828244] really_probe+0x25d/0x3c0 <4> [498.828249] driver_probe_device+0x10a/0x120 <4> [498.828253] __driver_attach+0xdb/0x100 <4> [498.828256] ? driver_probe_device+0x120/0x120 <4> [498.828259] bus_for_each_dev+0x74/0xc0 <4> [498.828264] bus_add_driver+0x15f/0x250 <4> [498.828268] ? 0xffffffffa00c3000 <4> [498.828271] driver_register+0x56/0xe0 <4> [498.828274] ? 0xffffffffa00c3000 <4> [498.828278] do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2e0 <4> [498.828281] ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x8f/0xd0 <4> [498.828285] ? do_init_module+0x1d/0x1ea <4> [498.828289] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80 <4> [498.828293] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x264/0x290 <4> [498.828297] do_init_module+0x56/0x1ea <4> [498.828302] load_module+0x26f5/0x29d0 <4> [498.828309] ? vfs_read+0x122/0x140 <4> [498.828318] ? __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0 <4> [498.828321] __se_sys_finit_module+0xd3/0xf0 <4> [498.828329] do_syscall_64+0x55/0x190 <4> [498.828332] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe <4> [498.828335] RIP: 0033:0x7fc0c3f16839 Fixes: 992d2098ef0b ("drm/i915/selftests: Split preemption smoke test into threads") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181002132927.7669-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-10-02drm/i915: Replace some open-coded i915_coherent_map_type()Chris Wilson1-1/+1
A few callsites were deciding on using WC or WB maps based on HAS_LLC(), so replace them with the equivalent helper function i915_coherent_map_type(). Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181001194447.29910-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-10-01drm/i915: Reserve some priority bits for internal useChris Wilson1-3/+5
In the next few patches, we will want to give a small priority boost to some requests/queues but not so much that we perturb the user controlled order. As such we will shift the user priority bits higher leaving ourselves a few low priority bits for our internal bumping. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181001123204.23982-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-10-01drm/i915/selftests: Include arbitration points in preemption smoketestChris Wilson1-33/+101
Include a batch full of a page of arbitration points in order to provide a window for inject_preempt_context() in the preemption smoketests. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181001123204.23982-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-10-01drm/i915/selftests: Split preemption smoke test into threadsChris Wilson1-12/+61
When submitting chains to each engine, we can do so (mostly) in parallel, so delegate submission to threads on a per-engine basis. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181001123204.23982-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-09-27drm/i915/selftests: Smoketest preemptionChris Wilson1-0/+137
Very light stress test to bombard the submission backends with a large stream with requests of randomly assigned priorities. Preemption will be occasionally requested, but unlikely to ever succeed! (Although we may build a long queue of requests and so may trigger an attempt to inject a preempt context, as we emit no batch, the arbitration window is limited to between requests inside the ringbuffer. The likelihood of actually causing a preemption event is therefore very small. A later variant should try to improve the likelihood of preemption events!) v2: Include a second pattern with more frequent preemption Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180925083205.2229-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-09-20drm/i915/selftests: Live tests emit requests and so require rpmChris Wilson1-0/+8
As we emit requests or touch HW directly for some of the live tests, the requirement is that we hold the rpm wakeref before doing so. We want a mix of granularity since we will want to test runtime suspend, so try to mark up only the critical sections where we need rpm for the live test. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108002 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180920144934.16611-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-07-16drm/i915/selftests: Force a preemption hangChris Wilson1-0/+115
Inject a failure into preemption completion to pretend as if the HW didn't successfully handle preemption and we are forced to do a reset in the middle. v2: Wait for preemption, to force testing with the missed preemption. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180716132154.12539-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-07-06drm/i915: Start returning an error from i915_vma_move_to_active()Chris Wilson1-2/+9
Handling such a late error in request construction is tricky, but to accommodate future patches which may allocate here, we potentially could err. To handle the error after already adjusting global state to track the new request, we must finish and submit the request. But we don't want to use the request as not everything is being tracked by it, so we opt to cancel the commands inside the request. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180706103947.15919-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-07-06drm/i915/selftests: Skip live_execlists if the GPU is terminally wedgedChris Wilson1-0/+3
If the GPU is irrecoverably wedged, we can not execute any requests making testing execlists (request execution) pointless. Skip! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180706114510.18467-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-06-14drm/i915: Make closing request flush mandatoryChris Wilson1-1/+1
For symmetry, simplicity and ensuring the request is always truly idle upon its completion, always emit the closing flush prior to emitting the request breadcrumb. Previously, we would only emit the flush if we had started a user batch, but this just leaves all the other paths open to speculation (do they affect the GPU caches or not?) With mm switching, a key requirement is that the GPU is flushed and invalidated before hand, so for absolute safety, we want that closing flush be mandatory. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180612105135.4459-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-06-05drm/i915/gtt: Rename i915_hw_ppgtt base memberChris Wilson1-1/+1
In the near future, I want to subclass gen6_hw_ppgtt as it contains a few specialised members and I wish to add more. To avoid the ugliness of using ppgtt->base.base, rename the i915_hw_ppgtt base member (i915_address_space) as vm, which is our common shorthand for an i915_address_space local. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180605153758.18422-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-18drm/i915: Move request->ctx asideChris Wilson1-1/+1
In the next patch, we want to store the intel_context pointer inside i915_request, as it is frequently access via a convoluted dance when submitting the request to hw. Having two context pointers inside i915_request leads to confusion so first rename the existing i915_gem_context pointer to i915_request.gem_context. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180517212633.24934-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-08drm/i915/selftests: Refactor common flush_test()Chris Wilson1-61/+7
Pull igt_flush_test() out into its own library before copying and pasting the code for a third time. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180505091014.26126-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-05-04drm/i915/selftests: Skip the execlists tests on !execlists machinesChris Wilson1-0/+4
Ignore the tests looking at the innards of execlists and its submission tasklets on machines that don't support execlists! Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180504124202.24894-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-04-18drm/i915: Pack params to engine->schedule() into a structChris Wilson1-3/+5
Today we only want to pass along the priority to engine->schedule(), but in the future we want to have much more control over the various aspects of the GPU during a context's execution, for example controlling the frequency allowed. As we need an ever growing number of parameters for scheduling, move those into a struct for convenience. v2: Move the anonymous struct into its own function for legibility and ye olde gcc. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180418184052.7129-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
2018-04-04drm/i915/selftests: Add basic sanitychecks for execlistsChris Wilson1-0/+507
Before adding a new feature to execlists submission, we should endeavour to cover the baseline behaviour with selftests. So start the ball rolling. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180404093329.5383-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk