| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
On a multiple package system using Sub-NUMA clustering, there is an issue
in mapping Linux CPU number to PUNIT PCI device when manufacturer decided
to reuse the PCI bus number across packages. Bus number can be reused as
long as they are in different domain or segment. In this case some CPU
will fail to find a PCI device to issue SST requests.
When bus numbers are reused across CPU packages, we are using proximity
information by matching CPU numa node id to PUNIT PCI device numa node
id. But on a package there can be only one PUNIT PCI device, but multiple
numa nodes (one for each sub cluster). So, the numa node ID of the PUNIT
PCI device can only match with one numa node id of CPUs in a sub cluster
in the package.
Since there can be only one PUNIT PCI device per package, if we match
with numa node id of any sub cluster in that package, we can use that
mapping for any CPU in that package. So, store the match information
in a per package data structure and return the information when there
is no match.
While here, use defines for max bus number instead of hardcoding.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629194817.2418240-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
|
|
As reported:
[ 256.104522] ======================================================
[ 256.113783] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 256.120093] 5.16.0-rc6-yocto-standard+ #99 Not tainted
[ 256.125362] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 256.131673] intel-speed-sel/844 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 256.137290] ffffffffc036f0d0 (punit_misc_dev_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: isst_if_open+0x18/0x90 [isst_if_common]
[ 256.147171]
[ 256.147171] but task is already holding lock:
[ 256.153135] ffffffff8ee7cb50 (misc_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: misc_open+0x2a/0x170
[ 256.160407]
[ 256.160407] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 256.160407]
[ 256.168712]
[ 256.168712] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 256.176327]
[ 256.176327] -> #1 (misc_mtx){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 256.181946] lock_acquire+0x1e6/0x330
[ 256.186265] __mutex_lock+0x9b/0x9b0
[ 256.190497] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
[ 256.195075] misc_register+0x32/0x1a0
[ 256.199390] isst_if_cdev_register+0x65/0x180 [isst_if_common]
[ 256.205878] isst_if_probe+0x144/0x16e [isst_if_mmio]
...
[ 256.241976]
[ 256.241976] -> #0 (punit_misc_dev_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[ 256.248552] validate_chain+0xbc6/0x1750
[ 256.253131] __lock_acquire+0x88c/0xc10
[ 256.257618] lock_acquire+0x1e6/0x330
[ 256.261933] __mutex_lock+0x9b/0x9b0
[ 256.266165] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
[ 256.270739] isst_if_open+0x18/0x90 [isst_if_common]
[ 256.276356] misc_open+0x100/0x170
[ 256.280409] chrdev_open+0xa5/0x1e0
...
The call sequence suggested that misc_device /dev file can be opened
before misc device is yet to be registered, which is done only once.
Here punit_misc_dev_lock was used as common lock, to protect the
registration by multiple ISST HW drivers, one time setup, prevent
duplicate registry of misc device and prevent load/unload when device
is open.
We can split into locks:
- One which just prevent duplicate call to misc_register() and one
time setup. Also never call again if the misc_register() failed or
required one time setup is failed. This lock is not shared with
any misc device callbacks.
- The other lock protects registry, load and unload of HW drivers.
Sequence in isst_if_cdev_register()
- Register callbacks under punit_misc_dev_open_lock
- Call isst_misc_reg() which registers misc_device on the first
registry which is under punit_misc_dev_reg_lock, which is not
shared with callbacks.
Sequence in isst_if_cdev_unregister
Just opposite of isst_if_cdev_register
Reported-and-tested-by: Liwei Song <liwei.song@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220112022521.54669-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
|
|
The code works the same either way, but it's better to use semi-colons
to separate statements.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210825072357.GA12957@kili
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
|
|
Move Intel Speed Select interface driver to intel sub-directory to improve
readability and rename it from intel_speed_select_if to speed_select_if.
Signed-off-by: Kate Hsuan <hpa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210820110458.73018-14-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
|
Srinivas Pandruvada
Dan Carpenter
Kate Hsuan