aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/page_isolation.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-10-28mm/page_isolation: fix clang deadcode warningMaria Yu1-1/+1
When !CONFIG_VM_BUG_ON, there is warning of clang-analyzer-deadcode.DeadStores: Value stored to 'mt' during its initialization is never read. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221021101555.7992-2-quic_aiquny@quicinc.com Signed-off-by: Maria Yu <quic_aiquny@quicinc.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03mm: add pageblock_aligned() macroKefeng Wang1-1/+1
Add pageblock_aligned() and use it to simplify code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907060844.126891-3-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03mm: add pageblock_align() macroKefeng Wang1-2/+2
Add pageblock_align() macro and use it to simplify code. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907060844.126891-2-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-10-03mm: reuse pageblock_start/end_pfn() macroKefeng Wang1-6/+5
Move pageblock_start_pfn/pageblock_end_pfn() into pageblock-flags.h, then they could be used somewhere else, not only in compaction, also use ALIGN_DOWN() instead of round_down() to be pair with ALIGN(), which should be same for pageblock usage. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220907060844.126891-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-09-26mm/page_isolation: fix isolate_single_pageblock() isolation behaviorZi Yan1-11/+14
set_migratetype_isolate() does not allow isolating MIGRATE_CMA pageblocks unless it is used for CMA allocation. isolate_single_pageblock() did not have the same behavior when it is used together with set_migratetype_isolate() in start_isolate_page_range(). This allows alloc_contig_range() with migratetype other than MIGRATE_CMA, like MIGRATE_MOVABLE (used by alloc_contig_pages()), to isolate first and last pageblock but fail the rest. The failure leads to changing migratetype of the first and last pageblock to MIGRATE_MOVABLE from MIGRATE_CMA, corrupting the CMA region. This can happen during gigantic page allocations. Like Doug said here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/a3363a52-883b-dcd1-b77f-f2bb378d6f2d@gmail.com/T/#u, for gigantic page allocations, the user would notice no difference, since the allocation on CMA region will fail as well as it did before. But it might hurt the performance of device drivers that use CMA, since CMA region size decreases. Fix it by passing migratetype into isolate_single_pageblock(), so that set_migratetype_isolate() used by isolate_single_pageblock() will prevent the isolation happening. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220914023913.1855924-1-zi.yan@sent.com Fixes: b2c9e2fbba32 ("mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity") Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reported-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-16mm/page_isolation.c: fix one kernel-doc commentYang Li1-0/+2
Remove one warning found by running scripts/kernel-doc, which is caused by using 'make W=1': mm/page_isolation.c:304: warning: Function parameter or member 'skip_isolation' not described in 'isolate_single_pageblock' Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220602062116.61199-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-06-01mm: page_isolation: use compound_nr() correctly in isolate_single_pageblock()Zi Yan1-1/+1
When compound_nr(page) was used, page was not guaranteed to be the head of the compound page and it could cause an infinite loop. Fix it by calling it on the head page. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220531024450.2498431-1-zi.yan@sent.com Fixes: b2c9e2fbba32 ("mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity") Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reported-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220530115027.123341-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/ Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-27mm: split free page with properly free memory accounting and without raceZi Yan1-3/+7
In isolate_single_pageblock(), free pages are checked without holding zone lock, but they can go away in split_free_page() when zone lock is held. Check the free page and its order again in split_free_page() when zone lock is held. Recheck the page if the free page is gone under zone lock. In addition, in split_free_page(), the free page was deleted from the page list without changing free page accounting. Add the missing free page accounting code. Fix the type of order parameter in split_free_page(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220525103621.987185e2ca0079f7b97b856d@linux-foundation.org/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220526231531.2404977-2-zi.yan@sent.com Fixes: b2c9e2fbba32 ("mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity") Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reported-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/c3932a6f-77fe-29f7-0c29-fe6b1c67ab7b@gmail.com/ Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-27mm: page-isolation: skip isolated pageblock in start_isolate_page_range()Zi Yan1-8/+18
start_isolate_page_range() first isolates the first and the last pageblocks in the range and ensure pages across range boundaries are split during isolation. But it missed the case when the range is <= a pageblock and the first and the last pageblocks are the same one, so the second isolate_single_pageblock() will always fail. To fix it, skip the pageblock isolation in second isolate_single_pageblock(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220526231531.2404977-1-zi.yan@sent.com Fixes: 88ee134320b8 ("mm: fix a potential infinite loop in start_isolate_page_range()") Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/ac65adc0-a7e4-cdfe-a0d8-757195b86293@samsung.com/ Reported-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/8ca048ca8b547e0dd1c95387ee05c23d@walle.cc/ Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-25mm: fix a potential infinite loop in start_isolate_page_range()Zi Yan1-12/+40
In isolate_single_pageblock() called by start_isolate_page_range(), there are some pageblock isolation issues causing a potential infinite loop when isolating a page range. This is reported by Qian Cai. 1. the pageblock was isolated by just changing pageblock migratetype without checking unmovable pages. Calling set_migratetype_isolate() to isolate pageblock properly. 2. an off-by-one error caused migrating pages unnecessarily, since the page is not crossing pageblock boundary. 3. migrating a compound page across pageblock boundary then splitting the free page later has a small race window that the free page might be allocated again, so that the code will try again, causing an potential infinite loop. Temporarily set the to-be-migrated page's pageblock to MIGRATE_ISOLATE to prevent that and bail out early if no free page is found after page migration. An additional fix to split_free_page() aims to avoid crashing in __free_one_page(). When the free page is split at the specified split_pfn_offset, free_page_order should check both the first bit of free_page_pfn and the last bit of split_pfn_offset and use the smaller one. For example, if free_page_pfn=0x10000, split_pfn_offset=0xc000, free_page_order should first be 0x8000 then 0x4000, instead of 0x4000 then 0x8000, which the original algorithm did. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: suppress min() warning] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220524194756.1698351-1-zi.yan@sent.com Fixes: b2c9e2fbba3253 ("mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularity") Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reported-by: Qian Cai <quic_qiancai@quicinc.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm: page_isolation: enable arbitrary range page isolation.Zi Yan1-17/+16
Now start_isolate_page_range() is ready to handle arbitrary range isolation, so move the alignment check/adjustment into the function body. Do the same for its counterpart undo_isolate_page_range(). alloc_contig_range(), its caller, can pass an arbitrary range instead of a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES aligned one. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220425143118.2850746-5-zi.yan@sent.com Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm: make alloc_contig_range work at pageblock granularityZi Yan1-5/+188
alloc_contig_range() worked at MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES granularity to avoid merging pageblocks with different migratetypes. It might unnecessarily convert extra pageblocks at the beginning and at the end of the range. Change alloc_contig_range() to work at pageblock granularity. Special handling is needed for free pages and in-use pages across the boundaries of the range specified by alloc_contig_range(). Because these= Partially isolated pages causes free page accounting issues. The free pages will be split and freed into separate migratetype lists; the in-use= Pages will be migrated then the freed pages will be handled in the aforementioned way. [ziy@nvidia.com: fix deadlock/crash] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/23A7297E-6C84-4138-A9FE-3598234004E6@nvidia.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220425143118.2850746-4-zi.yan@sent.com Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm: page_isolation: check specified range for unmovable pagesZi Yan1-13/+34
Enable set_migratetype_isolate() to check specified range for unmovable pages during isolation to prepare arbitrary range page isolation. The functionality will take effect in upcoming commits by adjusting the callers of start_isolate_page_range(), which uses set_migratetype_isolate(). For example, alloc_contig_range(), which calls start_isolate_page_range(), accepts unaligned ranges, but because page isolation is currently done at MAX_ORDER_NR_PAEGS granularity, pages that are out of the specified range but withint MAX_ORDER_NR_PAEGS alignment might be attempted for isolation and the failure of isolating these unrelated pages fails the whole operation undesirably. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220425143118.2850746-3-zi.yan@sent.com Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm: page_isolation: move has_unmovable_pages() to mm/page_isolation.cZi Yan1-0/+119
Patch series "Use pageblock_order for cma and alloc_contig_range alignment", v11. This patchset tries to remove the MAX_ORDER-1 alignment requirement for CMA and alloc_contig_range(). It prepares for my upcoming changes to make MAX_ORDER adjustable at boot time[1]. The MAX_ORDER - 1 alignment requirement comes from that alloc_contig_range() isolates pageblocks to remove free memory from buddy allocator but isolating only a subset of pageblocks within a page spanning across multiple pageblocks causes free page accounting issues. Isolated page might not be put into the right free list, since the code assumes the migratetype of the first pageblock as the whole free page migratetype. This is based on the discussion at [2]. To remove the requirement, this patchset: 1. isolates pages at pageblock granularity instead of max(MAX_ORDER_NR_PAEGS, pageblock_nr_pages); 2. splits free pages across the specified range or migrates in-use pages across the specified range then splits the freed page to avoid free page accounting issues (it happens when multiple pageblocks within a single page have different migratetypes); 3. only checks unmovable pages within the range instead of MAX_ORDER - 1 aligned range during isolation to avoid alloc_contig_range() failure when pageblocks within a MAX_ORDER - 1 aligned range are allocated separately. 4. returns pages not in the range as it did before. One optimization might come later: 1. make MIGRATE_ISOLATE a separate bit to be able to restore the original migratetypes when isolation fails in the middle of the range. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210805190253.2795604-1-zi.yan@sent.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/d19fb078-cb9b-f60f-e310-fdeea1b947d2@redhat.com/ This patch (of 6): has_unmovable_pages() is only used in mm/page_isolation.c. Move it from mm/page_alloc.c and make it static. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220425143118.2850746-2-zi.yan@sent.com Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Eric Ren <renzhengeek@gmail.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-28mm: wrap __find_buddy_pfn() with a necessary buddy page validationZi Yan1-6/+3
Whenever the buddy of a page is found from __find_buddy_pfn(), page_is_buddy() should be used to check its validity. Add a helper function find_buddy_page_pfn() to find the buddy page and do the check together. [ziy@nvidia.com: updates per David] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220401230804.1658207-2-zi.yan@sent.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAHk-=wji_AmYygZMTsPMdJ7XksMt7kOur8oDfDdniBRMjm4VkQ@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/7236E7CA-B5F1-4C04-AB85-E86FA3E9A54B@nvidia.com Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-02-04Revert "mm/page_isolation: unset migratetype directly for non Buddy page"Chen Wandun1-1/+1
This reverts commit 721fb891ad0b3956d5c168b2931e3e5e4fb7ca40. Commit 721fb891ad0b ("mm/page_isolation: unset migratetype directly for non Buddy page") will result memory that should in buddy disappear by mistake. move_freepages_block moves all pages in pageblock instead of pages indicated by input parameter, so if input pages is not in buddy but other pages in pageblock is in buddy, it will result in page out of control. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220126024436.13921-1-chenwandun@huawei.com Fixes: 721fb891ad0b ("mm/page_isolation: unset migratetype directly for non Buddy page") Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com> Reported-by: "kernelci.org bot" <bot@kernelci.org> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Tested-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> Tested-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-01-15mm/page_isolation: unset migratetype directly for non Buddy pageChen Wandun1-1/+1
In unset_migratetype_isolate(), we can bypass the call to move_freepages_block() for non-buddy pages. It will save a few cpu cycles for some situations such as cma and hugetlb when allocating continue pages, in these situation function alloc_contig_pages will be called. alloc_contig_pages __alloc_contig_migrate_range isolate_freepages_range ==> pages has been remove from buddy undo_isolate_page_range unset_migratetype_isolate ==> can directly set migratetype [osalvador@suse.de: changelog tweak] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211229033649.2760586-1-chenwandun@huawei.com Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock") Signed-off-by: Chen Wandun <chenwandun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Wang Kefeng <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-06mm/page_isolation: guard against possible putback unisolated pageMiaohe Lin1-2/+7
Isolating a free page in an isolated pageblock is expected to always work as watermarks don't apply here. But if __isolate_free_page() failed, due to condition changes, the page will be left on the free list. And the page will be put back to free list again via __putback_isolated_page(). This may trigger VM_BUG_ON_PAGE() on page->flags checking in __free_one_page() if PageReported is set. Or we will corrupt the free list because list_add() will be called for pages already on another list. Add a VM_WARN_ON() to complain about this change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210914114508.23725-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-06mm/page_isolation: fix potential missing call to unset_migratetype_isolate()Miaohe Lin1-17/+3
In start_isolate_page_range() undo path, pfn_to_online_page() just checks the first pfn in a pageblock while __first_valid_page() will traverse the pageblock until the first online pfn is found. So we may miss the call to unset_migratetype_isolate() in undo path and pages will remain isolated unexpectedly. Fix this by calling undo_isolate_page_range() and this will also help to simplify the code further. Note we shouldn't ever trigger it because MAX_ORDER-1 aligned pfn ranges shouldn't contain memory holes now. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210914114348.15569-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Fixes: 2ce13640b3f4 ("mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages") Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-08Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)Linus Torvalds1-6/+1
Merge more updates from Andrew Morton: "147 patches, based on 7d2a07b769330c34b4deabeed939325c77a7ec2f. Subsystems affected by this patch series: mm (memory-hotplug, rmap, ioremap, highmem, cleanups, secretmem, kfence, damon, and vmscan), alpha, percpu, procfs, misc, core-kernel, MAINTAINERS, lib, checkpatch, epoll, init, nilfs2, coredump, fork, pids, criu, kconfig, selftests, ipc, and scripts" * emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>: (94 commits) scripts: check_extable: fix typo in user error message mm/workingset: correct kernel-doc notations ipc: replace costly bailout check in sysvipc_find_ipc() selftests/memfd: remove unused variable Kconfig.debug: drop selecting non-existing HARDLOCKUP_DETECTOR_ARCH configs: remove the obsolete CONFIG_INPUT_POLLDEV prctl: allow to setup brk for et_dyn executables pid: cleanup the stale comment mentioning pidmap_init(). kernel/fork.c: unexport get_{mm,task}_exe_file coredump: fix memleak in dump_vma_snapshot() fs/coredump.c: log if a core dump is aborted due to changed file permissions nilfs2: use refcount_dec_and_lock() to fix potential UAF nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_delete_snapshot_group nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_create_snapshot_group nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_delete_##name##_group nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_create_##name##_group nilfs2: fix NULL pointer in nilfs_##name##_attr_release nilfs2: fix memory leak in nilfs_sysfs_create_device_group trap: cleanup trap_init() init: move usermodehelper_enable() to populate_rootfs() ...
2021-09-08mm: remove pfn_valid_within() and CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONEMike Rapoport1-6/+1
Patch series "mm: remove pfn_valid_within() and CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE". After recent updates to freeing unused parts of the memory map, no architecture can have holes in the memory map within a pageblock. This makes pfn_valid_within() check and CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE configuration option redundant. The first patch removes them both in a mechanical way and the second patch simplifies memory_hotplug::test_pages_in_a_zone() that had pfn_valid_within() surrounded by more logic than simple if. This patch (of 2): After recent changes in freeing of the unused parts of the memory map and rework of pfn_valid() in arm and arm64 there are no architectures that can have holes in the memory map within a pageblock and so nothing can enable CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE which guards non trivial implementation of pfn_valid_within(). With that, pfn_valid_within() is always hardwired to 1 and can be completely removed. Remove calls to pfn_valid_within() and CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210713080035.7464-1-rppt@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210713080035.7464-2-rppt@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-09-03mm/page_isolation: tracing: trace all test_pages_isolated failuresGeorge G. Davis1-3/+10
Some test_pages_isolated failure conditions don't include trace points. For debugging issues caused by "pinned" pages, make sure to trace all calls whether they succeed or fail. In this case, a failure case did not result in a trace point. So add the missing failure case in test_pages_isolated traces. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210823202823.13765-1-george_davis@mentor.com Signed-off-by: George G. Davis <davis.george@siemens.com> Cc: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15mm/page_isolation: do not isolate the max order pageMuchun Song1-1/+1
A max order page has no buddy page and never merges to another order. So isolating and then freeing it is pointless. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201202122114.75316-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: 3c605096d315 ("mm/page_alloc: restrict max order of merging on isolated pageblock") Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15mm, page_alloc: disable pcplists during memory offlineVlastimil Babka1-3/+3
Memory offlining relies on page isolation to guarantee a forward progress because pages cannot be reused while they are isolated. But the page isolation itself doesn't prevent from races while freed pages are stored on pcp lists and thus can be reused. This can be worked around by repeated draining of pcplists, as done by commit 968318261221 ("mm/memory_hotplug: drain per-cpu pages again during memory offline"). David and Michal would prefer that this race was closed in a way that callers of page isolation who need stronger guarantees don't need to repeatedly drain. David suggested disabling pcplists usage completely during page isolation, instead of repeatedly draining them. To achieve this without adding special cases in alloc/free fastpath, we can use the same approach as boot pagesets - when pcp->high is 0, any pcplist addition will be immediately flushed. The race can thus be closed by setting pcp->high to 0 and draining pcplists once, before calling start_isolate_page_range(). The draining will serialize after processes that already disabled interrupts and read the old value of pcp->high in free_unref_page_commit(), and processes that have not yet disabled interrupts, will observe pcp->high == 0 when they are rescheduled, and skip pcplists. This guarantees no stray pages on pcplists in zones where isolation happens. This patch thus adds zone_pcp_disable() and zone_pcp_enable() functions that page isolation users can call before start_isolate_page_range() and after unisolating (or offlining) the isolated pages. Also, drain_all_pages() is optimized to only execute on cpus where pcplists are not empty. The check can however race with a free to pcplist that has not yet increased the pcp->count from 0 to 1. Thus make the drain optionally skip the racy check and drain on all cpus, and use this option in zone_pcp_disable(). As we have to avoid external updates to high and batch while pcplists are disabled, we take pcp_batch_high_lock in zone_pcp_disable() and release it in zone_pcp_enable(). This also synchronizes multiple users of zone_pcp_disable()/enable(). Currently the only user of this functionality is offline_pages(). [vbabka@suse.cz: add comment, per David] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/527480ef-ed72-e1c1-52a0-1c5b0113df45@suse.cz Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201111092812.11329-8-vbabka@suse.cz Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-15mm, page_alloc: move draining pcplists to page isolation usersVlastimil Babka1-5/+5
Currently, pcplists are drained during set_migratetype_isolate() which means once per pageblock processed start_isolate_page_range(). This is somewhat wasteful. Moreover, the callers might need different guarantees, and the draining is currently prone to races and does not guarantee that no page from isolated pageblock will end up on the pcplist after the drain. Better guarantees are added by later patches and require explicit actions by page isolation users that need them. Thus it makes sense to move the current imperfect draining to the callers also as a preparation step. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201111092812.11329-7-vbabka@suse.cz Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-16mm: rename page_order() to buddy_order()Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)1-2/+2
The current page_order() can only be called on pages in the buddy allocator. For compound pages, you have to use compound_order(). This is confusing and led to a bug, so rename page_order() to buddy_order(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201001152259.14932-2-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-16mm/page_alloc: move pages to tail in move_to_free_list()David Hildenbrand1-0/+5
Whenever we move pages between freelists via move_to_free_list()/ move_freepages_block(), we don't actually touch the pages: 1. Page isolation doesn't actually touch the pages, it simply isolates pageblocks and moves all free pages to the MIGRATE_ISOLATE freelist. When undoing isolation, we move the pages back to the target list. 2. Page stealing (steal_suitable_fallback()) moves free pages directly between lists without touching them. 3. reserve_highatomic_pageblock()/unreserve_highatomic_pageblock() moves free pages directly between freelists without touching them. We already place pages to the tail of the freelists when undoing isolation via __putback_isolated_page(), let's do it in any case (e.g., if order <= pageblock_order) and document the behavior. To simplify, let's move the pages to the tail for all move_to_free_list()/move_freepages_block() users. In 2., the target list is empty, so there should be no change. In 3., we might observe a change, however, highatomic is more concerned about allocations succeeding than cache hotness - if we ever realize this change degrades a workload, we can special-case this instance and add a proper comment. This change results in all pages getting onlined via online_pages() to be placed to the tail of the freelist. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> Cc: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005121534.15649-4-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-16mm/page_isolation: simplify return value of start_isolate_page_range()David Hildenbrand1-5/+2
Callers no longer need the number of isolated pageblocks. Let's simplify. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200819175957.28465-7-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-13mm/page_isolation: cleanup set_migratetype_isolate()David Hildenbrand1-10/+7
Let's clean it up a bit, simplifying the exit paths. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-5-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-13mm/page_isolation: drop WARN_ON_ONCE() in set_migratetype_isolate()David Hildenbrand1-9/+6
Inside has_unmovable_pages(), we have a comment describing how unmovable data could end up in ZONE_MOVABLE - via "movablecore". Also, besides checking if the first page in the pageblock is reserved, we don't perform any further checks in case of ZONE_MOVABLE. In case of memory offlining, we set REPORT_FAILURE, properly dump_page() the page and handle the error gracefully. alloc_contig_pages() users currently never allocate from ZONE_MOVABLE. E.g., hugetlb uses alloc_contig_pages() for the allocation of gigantic pages only, which will never end up on the MOVABLE zone (see htlb_alloc_mask()). Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-4-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-10-13mm/page_isolation: exit early when pageblock is isolated in set_migratetype_isolate()David Hildenbrand1-4/+5
Right now, if we have two isolations racing on a pageblock that's in the MOVABLE zone, we would trigger the WARN_ON_ONCE(). Let's just return directly, simplifying error handling. The change was introduced in commit 3d680bdf60a5 ("mm/page_isolation: fix potential warning from user"). As far as I can see, we currently don't have alloc_contig_range() users that use the ZONE_MOVABLE (anymore), so it's currently more a cleanup and a preparation for the future than a fix. Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200816125333.7434-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-09-19mm/memory_hotplug: drain per-cpu pages again during memory offlinePavel Tatashin1-0/+8
There is a race during page offline that can lead to infinite loop: a page never ends up on a buddy list and __offline_pages() keeps retrying infinitely or until a termination signal is received. Thread#1 - a new process: load_elf_binary begin_new_exec exec_mmap mmput exit_mmap tlb_finish_mmu tlb_flush_mmu release_pages free_unref_page_list free_unref_page_prepare set_pcppage_migratetype(page, migratetype); // Set page->index migration type below MIGRATE_PCPTYPES Thread#2 - hot-removes memory __offline_pages start_isolate_page_range set_migratetype_isolate set_pageblock_migratetype(page, MIGRATE_ISOLATE); Set migration type to MIGRATE_ISOLATE-> set drain_all_pages(zone); // drain per-cpu page lists to buddy allocator. Thread#1 - continue free_unref_page_commit migratetype = get_pcppage_migratetype(page); // get old migration type list_add(&page->lru, &pcp->lists[migratetype]); // add new page to already drained pcp list Thread#2 Never drains pcp again, and therefore gets stuck in the loop. The fix is to try to drain per-cpu lists again after check_pages_isolated_cb() fails. Fixes: c52e75935f8d ("mm: remove extra drain pages on pcp list") Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200903140032.380431-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200904151448.100489-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200904070235.GA15277@dhcp22.suse.cz Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-12mm/page_alloc: remove a wrapper for alloc_migration_target()Joonsoo Kim1-10/+0
There is a well-defined standard migration target callback. Use it directly. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594622517-20681-8-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-12mm/migrate: introduce a standard migration target allocation functionJoonsoo Kim1-2/+5
There are some similar functions for migration target allocation. Since there is no fundamental difference, it's better to keep just one rather than keeping all variants. This patch implements base migration target allocation function. In the following patches, variants will be converted to use this function. Changes should be mechanical, but, unfortunately, there are some differences. First, some callers' nodemask is assgined to NULL since NULL nodemask will be considered as all available nodes, that is, &node_states[N_MEMORY]. Second, for hugetlb page allocation, gfp_mask is redefined as regular hugetlb allocation gfp_mask plus __GFP_THISNODE if user provided gfp_mask has it. This is because future caller of this function requires to set this node constaint. Lastly, if provided nodeid is NUMA_NO_NODE, nodeid is set up to the node where migration source lives. It helps to remove simple wrappers for setting up the nodeid. Note that PageHighmem() call in previous function is changed to open-code "is_highmem_idx()" since it provides more readability. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: tweak patch title, per Vlastimil] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo in comment] Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594622517-20681-6-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-08-12mm/page_isolation: prefer the node of the source pageJoonsoo Kim1-1/+3
Patch series "clean-up the migration target allocation functions", v5. This patch (of 9): For locality, it's better to migrate the page to the same node rather than the node of the current caller's cpu. Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594622517-20681-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1594622517-20681-2-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-06-04mm: Allow to offline unmovable PageOffline() pages via MEM_GOING_OFFLINEDavid Hildenbrand1-0/+9
virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts were unplugged (allocated via alloc_contig_range()), especially, to later offline and remove completely unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that PageOffline() has to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the buddy). Let's allow to do that by allowing to isolate any PageOffline() page when offlining. This way, we can reach the memory hotplug notifier MEM_GOING_OFFLINE, where the driver can signal that he is fine with offlining this page by dropping its reference count. PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0 can then be skipped when offlining the pages (like if they were free, however they are not in the buddy). Anybody who uses PageOffline() pages and does not agree to offline them (e.g., Hyper-V balloon, XEN balloon, VMWare balloon for 2MB pages) will not decrement the reference count and make offlining fail when trying to migrate such an unmovable page. So there should be no observable change. Same applies to balloon compaction users (movable PageOffline() pages), the pages will simply be migrated. Note 1: If offlining fails, a driver has to increment the reference count again in MEM_CANCEL_OFFLINE. Note 2: A driver that makes use of this has to be aware that re-onlining the memory block has to be handled by hooking into onlining code (online_page_callback_t), resetting the page PageOffline() and not giving them to the buddy. Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Tested-by: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@oracle.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200507140139.17083-7-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
2020-04-07mm: add function __putback_isolated_pageAlexander Duyck1-4/+2
There are cases where we would benefit from avoiding having to go through the allocation and free cycle to return an isolated page. Examples for this might include page poisoning in which we isolate a page and then put it back in the free list without ever having actually allocated it. This will enable us to also avoid notifiers for the future free page reporting which will need to avoid retriggering page reporting when returning pages that have been reported on. Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@redhat.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Wang <wei.w.wang@intel.com> Cc: Yang Zhang <yang.zhang.wz@gmail.com> Cc: wei qi <weiqi4@huawei.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200211224624.29318.89287.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-01-31mm/page_isolation: fix potential warning from userQian Cai1-7/+11
It makes sense to call the WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE) from start_isolate_page_range(), but should avoid triggering it from userspace, i.e, from is_mem_section_removable() because it could crash the system by a non-root user if warn_on_panic is set. While at it, simplify the code a bit by removing an unnecessary jump label. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200120163915.1469-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-01-31mm/hotplug: silence a lockdep splat with printk()Qian Cai1-1/+10
It is not that hard to trigger lockdep splats by calling printk from under zone->lock. Most of them are false positives caused by lock chains introduced early in the boot process and they do not cause any real problems (although most of the early boot lock dependencies could happen after boot as well). There are some console drivers which do allocate from the printk context as well and those should be fixed. In any case, false positives are not that trivial to workaround and it is far from optimal to lose lockdep functionality for something that is a non-issue. So change has_unmovable_pages() so that it no longer calls dump_page() itself - instead it returns a "struct page *" of the unmovable page back to the caller so that in the case of a has_unmovable_pages() failure, the caller can call dump_page() after releasing zone->lock. Also, make dump_page() is able to report a CMA page as well, so the reason string from has_unmovable_pages() can be removed. Even though has_unmovable_pages doesn't hold any reference to the returned page this should be reasonably safe for the purpose of reporting the page (dump_page) because it cannot be hotremoved in the context of memory unplug. The state of the page might change but that is the case even with the existing code as zone->lock only plays role for free pages. While at it, remove a similar but unnecessary debug-only printk() as well. A sample of one of those lockdep splats is, WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected ------------------------------------------------------ test.sh/8653 is trying to acquire lock: ffffffff865a4460 (console_owner){-.-.}, at: console_unlock+0x207/0x750 but task is already holding lock: ffff88883fff3c58 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __offline_isolated_pages+0x179/0x3e0 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #3 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 rmqueue_bulk.constprop.21+0xb6/0x1160 get_page_from_freelist+0x898/0x22c0 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x2f3/0x1cd0 alloc_pages_current+0x9c/0x110 allocate_slab+0x4c6/0x19c0 new_slab+0x46/0x70 ___slab_alloc+0x58b/0x960 __slab_alloc+0x43/0x70 __kmalloc+0x3ad/0x4b0 __tty_buffer_request_room+0x100/0x250 tty_insert_flip_string_fixed_flag+0x67/0x110 pty_write+0xa2/0xf0 n_tty_write+0x36b/0x7b0 tty_write+0x284/0x4c0 __vfs_write+0x50/0xa0 vfs_write+0x105/0x290 redirected_tty_write+0x6a/0xc0 do_iter_write+0x248/0x2a0 vfs_writev+0x106/0x1e0 do_writev+0xd4/0x180 __x64_sys_writev+0x45/0x50 do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe -> #2 (&(&port->lock)->rlock){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 tty_port_tty_get+0x20/0x60 tty_port_default_wakeup+0xf/0x30 tty_port_tty_wakeup+0x39/0x40 uart_write_wakeup+0x2a/0x40 serial8250_tx_chars+0x22e/0x440 serial8250_handle_irq.part.8+0x14a/0x170 serial8250_default_handle_irq+0x5c/0x90 serial8250_interrupt+0xa6/0x130 __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x78/0x4f0 handle_irq_event_percpu+0x70/0x100 handle_irq_event+0x5a/0x8b handle_edge_irq+0x117/0x370 do_IRQ+0x9e/0x1e0 ret_from_intr+0x0/0x2a cpuidle_enter_state+0x156/0x8e0 cpuidle_enter+0x41/0x70 call_cpuidle+0x5e/0x90 do_idle+0x333/0x370 cpu_startup_entry+0x1d/0x1f start_secondary+0x290/0x330 secondary_startup_64+0xb6/0xc0 -> #1 (&port_lock_key){-.-.}: __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x3a/0x50 serial8250_console_write+0x3e4/0x450 univ8250_console_write+0x4b/0x60 console_unlock+0x501/0x750 vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340 vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4 printk+0x9f/0xc5 -> #0 (console_owner){-.-.}: check_prev_add+0x107/0xea0 validate_chain+0x8fc/0x1200 __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 console_unlock+0x269/0x750 vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340 vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4 printk+0x9f/0xc5 __offline_isolated_pages.cold.52+0x2f/0x30a offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x17/0x30 walk_system_ram_range+0xda/0x160 __offline_pages+0x79c/0xa10 offline_pages+0x11/0x20 memory_subsys_offline+0x7e/0xc0 device_offline+0xd5/0x110 state_store+0xc6/0xe0 dev_attr_store+0x3f/0x60 sysfs_kf_write+0x89/0xb0 kernfs_fop_write+0x188/0x240 __vfs_write+0x50/0xa0 vfs_write+0x105/0x290 ksys_write+0xc6/0x160 __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: console_owner --> &(&port->lock)->rlock --> &(&zone->lock)->rlock Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock); lock(&(&port->lock)->rlock); lock(&(&zone->lock)->rlock); lock(console_owner); *** DEADLOCK *** 9 locks held by test.sh/8653: #0: ffff88839ba7d408 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}, at: vfs_write+0x25f/0x290 #1: ffff888277618880 (&of->mutex){+.+.}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x128/0x240 #2: ffff8898131fc218 (kn->count#115){.+.+}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x138/0x240 #3: ffffffff86962a80 (device_hotplug_lock){+.+.}, at: lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x16/0x50 #4: ffff8884374f4990 (&dev->mutex){....}, at: device_offline+0x70/0x110 #5: ffffffff86515250 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: __offline_pages+0xbf/0xa10 #6: ffffffff867405f0 (mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: percpu_down_write+0x87/0x2f0 #7: ffff88883fff3c58 (&(&zone->lock)->rlock){-.-.}, at: __offline_isolated_pages+0x179/0x3e0 #8: ffffffff865a4920 (console_lock){+.+.}, at: vprintk_emit+0x100/0x340 stack backtrace: Hardware name: HPE ProLiant DL560 Gen10/ProLiant DL560 Gen10, BIOS U34 05/21/2019 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x86/0xca print_circular_bug.cold.31+0x243/0x26e check_noncircular+0x29e/0x2e0 check_prev_add+0x107/0xea0 validate_chain+0x8fc/0x1200 __lock_acquire+0x5b3/0xb40 lock_acquire+0x126/0x280 console_unlock+0x269/0x750 vprintk_emit+0x10d/0x340 vprintk_default+0x1f/0x30 vprintk_func+0x44/0xd4 printk+0x9f/0xc5 __offline_isolated_pages.cold.52+0x2f/0x30a offline_isolated_pages_cb+0x17/0x30 walk_system_ram_range+0xda/0x160 __offline_pages+0x79c/0xa10 offline_pages+0x11/0x20 memory_subsys_offline+0x7e/0xc0 device_offline+0xd5/0x110 state_store+0xc6/0xe0 dev_attr_store+0x3f/0x60 sysfs_kf_write+0x89/0xb0 kernfs_fop_write+0x188/0x240 __vfs_write+0x50/0xa0 vfs_write+0x105/0x290 ksys_write+0xc6/0x160 __x64_sys_write+0x43/0x50 do_syscall_64+0xcc/0x76c entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200117181200.20299-1-cai@lca.pw Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-01-31mm: remove "count" parameter from has_unmovable_pages()David Hildenbrand1-1/+1
Now that the memory isolate notifier is gone, the parameter is always 0. Drop it and cleanup has_unmovable_pages(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191114131911.11783-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Arun KS <arunks@codeaurora.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-01-31mm: remove the memory isolate notifierDavid Hildenbrand1-34/+4
Luckily, we have no users left, so we can get rid of it. Cleanup set_migratetype_isolate() a little bit. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191114131911.11783-2-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-12-01mm/page_isolation.c: convert SKIP_HWPOISON to MEMORY_OFFLINEDavid Hildenbrand1-6/+6
We have two types of users of page isolation: 1. Memory offlining: Offline memory so it can be unplugged. Memory won't be touched. 2. Memory allocation: Allocate memory (e.g., alloc_contig_range()) to become the owner of the memory and make use of it. For example, in case we want to offline memory, we can ignore (skip over) PageHWPoison() pages, as the memory won't get used. We can allow to offline memory. In contrast, we don't want to allow to allocate such memory. Let's generalize the approach so we can special case other types of pages we want to skip over in case we offline memory. While at it, also pass the same flags to test_pages_isolated(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191021172353.3056-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-07-12mm/page_isolation.c: change the prototype of undo_isolate_page_range()Pingfan Liu1-2/+1
undo_isolate_page_range() never fails, so no need to return value. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1562075604-8979-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-05-14mm/page_isolation.c: remove redundant pfn_valid_within() in __first_valid_page()Anshuman Khandual1-2/+0
pfn_valid_within() calls pfn_valid() when CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE making it redundant for both definitions (w/wo CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG) of the helper pfn_to_online_page() which either calls pfn_valid() or pfn_valid_within(). pfn_valid_within() being 1 when !CONFIG_HOLES_IN_ZONE is irrelevant either way. This does not change functionality. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1553141595-26907-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-29mm/page_isolation.c: fix a wrong flag in set_migratetype_isolate()Qian Cai1-1/+2
Due to has_unmovable_pages() taking an incorrect irqsave flag instead of the isolation flag in set_migratetype_isolate(), there are issues with HWPOSION and error reporting where dump_page() is not called when there is an unmovable page. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190320204941.53731-1-cai@lca.pw Fixes: d381c54760dc ("mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memory") Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [5.0.x] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-29mm/hotplug: fix offline undo_isolate_page_range()Qian Cai1-18/+30
Commit f1dd2cd13c4b ("mm, memory_hotplug: do not associate hotadded memory to zones until online") introduced move_pfn_range_to_zone() which calls memmap_init_zone() during onlining a memory block. memmap_init_zone() will reset pagetype flags and makes migrate type to be MOVABLE. However, in __offline_pages(), it also call undo_isolate_page_range() after offline_isolated_pages() to do the same thing. Due to commit 2ce13640b3f4 ("mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages") changed __first_valid_page() to skip offline pages, undo_isolate_page_range() here just waste CPU cycles looping around the offlining PFN range while doing nothing, because __first_valid_page() will return NULL as offline_isolated_pages() has already marked all memory sections within the pfn range as offline via offline_mem_sections(). Also, after calling the "useless" undo_isolate_page_range() here, it reaches the point of no returning by notifying MEM_OFFLINE. Those pages will be marked as MIGRATE_MOVABLE again once onlining. The only thing left to do is to decrease the number of isolated pageblocks zone counter which would make some paths of the page allocation slower that the above commit introduced. Even if alloc_contig_range() can be used to isolate 16GB-hugetlb pages on ppc64, an "int" should still be enough to represent the number of pageblocks there. Fix an incorrect comment along the way. [cai@lca.pw: v4] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190314150641.59358-1-cai@lca.pw Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190313143133.46200-1-cai@lca.pw Fixes: 2ce13640b3f4 ("mm: __first_valid_page skip over offline pages") Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.13+] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-12-28mm: only report isolation failures when offlining memoryMichal Hocko1-6/+4
Heiko has complained that his log is swamped by warnings from has_unmovable_pages [ 20.536664] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages [ 20.536792] page:000003d081ff4080 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000008ff88600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 [ 20.536794] flags: 0x3fffe0000010200(slab|head) [ 20.536795] raw: 03fffe0000010200 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 000000008ff88600 [ 20.536796] raw: 0000000000000000 0020004100000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000 [ 20.536797] page dumped because: has_unmovable_pages [ 20.536814] page:000003d0823b0000 count:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 [ 20.536815] flags: 0x7fffe0000000000() [ 20.536817] raw: 07fffe0000000000 0000000000000100 0000000000000200 0000000000000000 [ 20.536818] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000001 0000000000000000 which are not triggered by the memory hotplug but rather CMA allocator. The original idea behind dumping the page state for all call paths was that these messages will be helpful debugging failures. From the above it seems that this is not the case for the CMA path because we are lacking much more context. E.g the second reported page might be a CMA allocated page. It is still interesting to see a slab page in the CMA area but it is hard to tell whether this is bug from the above output alone. Address this issue by dumping the page state only on request. Both start_isolate_page_range and has_unmovable_pages already have an argument to ignore hwpoison pages so make this argument more generic and turn it into flags and allow callers to combine non-default modes into a mask. While we are at it, has_unmovable_pages call from is_pageblock_removable_nolock (sysfs removable file) is questionable to report the failure so drop it from there as well. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181218092802.31429-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reported-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-04-11mm, migrate: remove reason argument from new_page_tMichal Hocko1-2/+1
No allocation callback is using this argument anymore. new_page_node used to use this parameter to convey node_id resp. migration error up to move_pages code (do_move_page_to_node_array). The error status never made it into the final status field and we have a better way to communicate node id to the status field now. All other allocation callbacks simply ignored the argument so we can drop it finally. [mhocko@suse.com: fix migration callback] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180105085259.GH2801@dhcp22.suse.cz [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix alloc_misplaced_dst_page()] [mhocko@kernel.org: fix build] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180103091134.GB11319@dhcp22.suse.cz Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180103082555.14592-3-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu> Cc: Andrea Reale <ar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-04-05mm/page_isolation.c: make start_isolate_page_range() fail if already isolatedMike Kravetz1-1/+17
start_isolate_page_range() is used to set the migrate type of a set of pageblocks to MIGRATE_ISOLATE while attempting to start a migration operation. It assumes that only one thread is calling it for the specified range. This routine is used by CMA, memory hotplug and gigantic huge pages. Each of these users synchronize access to the range within their subsystem. However, two subsystems (CMA and gigantic huge pages for example) could attempt operations on the same range. If this happens, one thread may 'undo' the work another thread is doing. This can result in pageblocks being incorrectly left marked as MIGRATE_ISOLATE and therefore not available for page allocation. What is ideally needed is a way to synchronize access to a set of pageblocks that are undergoing isolation and migration. The only thing we know about these pageblocks is that they are all in the same zone. A per-node mutex is too coarse as we want to allow multiple operations on different ranges within the same zone concurrently. Instead, we will use the migration type of the pageblocks themselves as a form of synchronization. start_isolate_page_range sets the migration type on a set of page- blocks going in order from the one associated with the smallest pfn to the largest pfn. The zone lock is acquired to check and set the migration type. When going through the list of pageblocks check if MIGRATE_ISOLATE is already set. If so, this indicates another thread is working on this pageblock. We know exactly which pageblocks we set, so clean up by undo those and return -EBUSY. This allows start_isolate_page_range to serve as a synchronization mechanism and will allow for more general use of callers making use of these interfaces. Update comments in alloc_contig_range to reflect this new functionality. Each CPU holds the associated zone lock to modify or examine the migration type of a pageblock. And, it will only examine/update a single pageblock per lock acquire/release cycle. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180309224731.16978-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@mina86.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-15mm: distinguish CMA and MOVABLE isolation in has_unmovable_pages()Michal Hocko1-5/+5
Joonsoo has noticed that "mm: drop migrate type checks from has_unmovable_pages" would break CMA allocator because it relies on has_unmovable_pages returning false even for CMA pageblocks which in fact don't have to be movable: alloc_contig_range start_isolate_page_range set_migratetype_isolate has_unmovable_pages This is a result of the code sharing between CMA and memory hotplug while each one has a different idea of what has_unmovable_pages should return. This is unfortunate but fixing it properly would require a lot of code duplication. Fix the issue by introducing the requested migrate type argument and special case MIGRATE_CMA case where CMA page blocks are handled properly. This will work for memory hotplug because it requires MIGRATE_MOVABLE. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171019122118.y6cndierwl2vnguj@dhcp22.suse.cz Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Reported-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Tested-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com> Tested-by: Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> Cc: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@huawei.com> Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Copyright © 1996 – 2023 Jason A. Donenfeld. All Rights Reverse Engineered.