aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/net/netfilter/nf_nat_proto_udp.c (follow)
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-12-17netfilter: nat: remove l4proto->manip_pktFlorian Westphal1-94/+0
This removes the last l4proto indirection, the two callers, the l3proto packet mangling helpers for ipv4 and ipv6, now call the nf_nat_l4proto_manip_pkt() helper. nf_nat_proto_{dccp,tcp,sctp,gre,icmp,icmpv6} are left behind, even though they contain no functionality anymore to not clutter this patch. Next patch will remove the empty files and the nf_nat_l4proto struct. nf_nat_proto_udp.c is renamed to nf_nat_proto.c, as it now contains the other nat manip functionality as well, not just udp and udplite. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
2018-12-17netfilter: nat: remove l4proto->nlattr_to_rangeFlorian Westphal1-6/+0
all protocols did set this to nf_nat_l4proto_nlattr_to_range, so just call it directly. The important difference is that we'll now also call it for protocols that we don't support (i.e., nf_nat_proto_unknown did not provide .nlattr_to_range). However, there should be no harm, even icmp provided this callback. If we don't implement a specific l4nat for this, nothing would make use of this information, so adding a big switch/case construct listing all supported l4protocols seems a bit pointless. This change leaves a single function pointer in the l4proto struct. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
2018-12-17netfilter: nat: remove l4proto->in_rangeFlorian Westphal1-2/+0
With exception of icmp, all of the l4 nat protocols set this to nf_nat_l4proto_in_range. Get rid of this and just check the l4proto in the caller. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
2018-12-17netfilter: nat: un-export nf_nat_l4proto_unique_tupleFlorian Westphal1-22/+0
almost all l4proto->unique_tuple implementations just call this helper, so make ->unique_tuple() optional and call its helper directly if the l4proto doesn't override it. This is an intermediate step to get rid of ->unique_tuple completely. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
2018-12-01netfilter: nat: remove l4 protocol port roversFlorian Westphal1-8/+2
This is a leftover from days where single-cpu systems were common: Store last port used to resolve a clash to use it as a starting point when the next conflict needs to be resolved. When we have parallel attempt to connect to same address:port pair, its likely that both cores end up computing the same "available" port, as both use same starting port, and newly used ports won't become visible to other cores until the conntrack gets confirmed later. One of the cores then has to drop the packet at insertion time because the chosen new tuple turns out to be in use after all. Lets simplify this: remove port rover and use a pseudo-random starting point. Note that this doesn't make netfilter default to 'fully random' mode; the 'rover' was only used if NAT could not reuse source port as-is. Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
2018-04-24netfilter: add NAT support for shifted portmap rangesThierry Du Tre1-2/+2
This is a patch proposal to support shifted ranges in portmaps. (i.e. tcp/udp incoming port 5000-5100 on WAN redirected to LAN 192.168.1.5:2000-2100) Currently DNAT only works for single port or identical port ranges. (i.e. ports 5000-5100 on WAN interface redirected to a LAN host while original destination port is not altered) When different port ranges are configured, either 'random' mode should be used, or else all incoming connections are mapped onto the first port in the redirect range. (in described example WAN:5000-5100 will all be mapped to 192.168.1.5:2000) This patch introduces a new mode indicated by flag NF_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_OFFSET which uses a base port value to calculate an offset with the destination port present in the incoming stream. That offset is then applied as index within the redirect port range (index modulo rangewidth to handle range overflow). In described example the base port would be 5000. An incoming stream with destination port 5004 would result in an offset value 4 which means that the NAT'ed stream will be using destination port 2004. Other possibilities include deterministic mapping of larger or multiple ranges to a smaller range : WAN:5000-5999 -> LAN:5000-5099 (maps WAN port 5*xx to port 51xx) This patch does not change any current behavior. It just adds new NAT proto range functionality which must be selected via the specific flag when intended to use. A patch for iptables (libipt_DNAT.c + libip6t_DNAT.c) will also be proposed which makes this functionality immediately available. Signed-off-by: Thierry Du Tre <thierry@dtsystems.be> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
2017-01-03netfilter: nat: merge udp and udplite helpersFlorian Westphal1-12/+66
udplite nat was copied from udp nat, they are virtually 100% identical. Not really surprising given udplite is just udp with partial csum coverage. old: text data bss dec hex filename 11606 1457 210 13273 33d9 nf_nat.ko 330 0 2 332 14c nf_nat_proto_udp.o 276 0 2 278 116 nf_nat_proto_udplite.o new: text data bss dec hex filename 11598 1457 210 13265 33d1 nf_nat.ko 640 0 4 644 284 nf_nat_proto_udp.o Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
2015-08-17net: Change pseudohdr argument of inet_proto_csum_replace* to be a boolTom Herbert1-1/+1
inet_proto_csum_replace4,2,16 take a pseudohdr argument which indicates the checksum field carries a pseudo header. This argument should be a boolean instead of an int. Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2014-06-30netfilter: use IS_ENABLED() macroDuan Jiong1-1/+1
replace: #if defined(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK) || defined(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK_MODULE) with #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK) replace: #if !defined(CONFIG_NF_NAT) && !defined(CONFIG_NF_NAT_MODULE) with #if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT) replace: #if !defined(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) && !defined(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MODULE) with #if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK) And add missing: IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_CT_NETLINK) in net/ipv{4,6}/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv{4,6}.c Signed-off-by: Duan Jiong <duanj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
2012-08-30netfilter: add protocol independent NAT corePatrick McHardy1-0/+76
Convert the IPv4 NAT implementation to a protocol independent core and address family specific modules. Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>