| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The purpose of the last test case is to test VXLAN encapsulation and
decapsulation when the underlay lookup takes place in a non-default VRF.
This is achieved by enslaving the physical device of the tunnel to a
VRF.
The binding of the VXLAN UDP socket to the VRF happens when the VXLAN
device itself is opened, not when its physical device is opened. This
was also mentioned in the cited commit ("tests that moving the underlay
from a VRF to another works when down/up the VXLAN interface"), but the
test did something else.
Fix it by reopening the VXLAN device instead of its physical device.
Before:
# ./test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh
Checking HV connectivity [ OK ]
Check VM connectivity through VXLAN (underlay in the default VRF) [ OK ]
Check VM connectivity through VXLAN (underlay in a VRF) [FAIL]
After:
# ./test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh
Checking HV connectivity [ OK ]
Check VM connectivity through VXLAN (underlay in the default VRF) [ OK ]
Check VM connectivity through VXLAN (underlay in a VRF) [ OK ]
Fixes: 03f1c26b1c56 ("test/net: Add script for VXLAN underlay in a VRF")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220324200514.1638326-1-idosch@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
It looks like test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh is always failing to verify the
connectivity test during the ping between the two simulated VMs.
This is due to the fact that veth-hv in each VM should have a distinct
MAC address.
Fix by setting a unique MAC address on each simulated VM interface.
Without this fix:
$ sudo ./tools/testing/selftests/net/test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh
Checking HV connectivity [ OK ]
Check VM connectivity through VXLAN (underlay in the default VRF) [FAIL]
With this fix applied:
$ sudo ./tools/testing/selftests/net/test_vxlan_under_vrf.sh
Checking HV connectivity [ OK ]
Check VM connectivity through VXLAN (underlay in the default VRF) [ OK ]
Check VM connectivity through VXLAN (underlay in a VRF) [FAIL]
NOTE: the connectivity test with the underlay VRF is still failing; it
seems that ARP requests are blocked at the simulated hypervisor level,
probably due to some missing ARP forwarding rules. This requires more
investigation (in the meantime we may consider to set that test as
expected failure - XFAIL).
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
The cleanup function in this script that tries to delete hv-1 / hv-2
vm-1 / vm-2 netns will generate some uncessary error messages:
Cannot remove namespace file "/run/netns/hv-2": No such file or directory
Cannot remove namespace file "/run/netns/vm-1": No such file or directory
Cannot remove namespace file "/run/netns/vm-2": No such file or directory
Redirect it to /dev/null like other commands in the cleanup function
to reduce confusion.
Signed-off-by: Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201211042420.16411-1-po-hsu.lin@canonical.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
|
|
This script tests the support of a VXLAN underlay in a non-default VRF.
It does so by simulating two hypervisors and two VMs, an extended L2
between the VMs with the hypervisors as VTEPs with the underlay in a
VRF, and finally by pinging the two VMs.
It also tests that moving the underlay from a VRF to another works when
down/up the VXLAN interface.
Signed-off-by: Alexis Bauvin <abauvin@scaleway.com>
Reviewed-by: Amine Kherbouche <akherbouche@scaleway.com>
Reviewed-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Amine Kherbouche <akherbouche@scaleway.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
Ido Schimmel
Andrea Righi
Po-Hsu Lin
Alexis Bauvin