blob: 6eb6fcb83f6362c2126af95207971b5ff3620c80 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
/*
* Copyright (C) 1994 Linus Torvalds
*
* Pentium III FXSR, SSE support
* General FPU state handling cleanups
* Gareth Hughes <gareth@valinux.com>, May 2000
* x86-64 work by Andi Kleen 2002
*/
#ifndef _ASM_X86_I387_H
#define _ASM_X86_I387_H
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/hardirq.h>
struct pt_regs;
struct user_i387_struct;
extern int init_fpu(struct task_struct *child);
extern void fpu_finit(struct fpu *fpu);
extern int dump_fpu(struct pt_regs *, struct user_i387_struct *);
extern void math_state_restore(void);
extern bool irq_fpu_usable(void);
/*
* Careful: __kernel_fpu_begin/end() must be called with preempt disabled
* and they don't touch the preempt state on their own.
* If you enable preemption after __kernel_fpu_begin(), preempt notifier
* should call the __kernel_fpu_end() to prevent the kernel/user FPU
* state from getting corrupted. KVM for example uses this model.
*
* All other cases use kernel_fpu_begin/end() which disable preemption
* during kernel FPU usage.
*/
extern void __kernel_fpu_begin(void);
extern void __kernel_fpu_end(void);
static inline void kernel_fpu_begin(void)
{
preempt_disable();
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq_fpu_usable());
__kernel_fpu_begin();
}
static inline void kernel_fpu_end(void)
{
__kernel_fpu_end();
preempt_enable();
}
/* Must be called with preempt disabled */
extern void kernel_fpu_disable(void);
extern void kernel_fpu_enable(void);
/*
* Some instructions like VIA's padlock instructions generate a spurious
* DNA fault but don't modify SSE registers. And these instructions
* get used from interrupt context as well. To prevent these kernel instructions
* in interrupt context interacting wrongly with other user/kernel fpu usage, we
* should use them only in the context of irq_ts_save/restore()
*/
static inline int irq_ts_save(void)
{
/*
* If in process context and not atomic, we can take a spurious DNA fault.
* Otherwise, doing clts() in process context requires disabling preemption
* or some heavy lifting like kernel_fpu_begin()
*/
if (!in_atomic())
return 0;
if (read_cr0() & X86_CR0_TS) {
clts();
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
static inline void irq_ts_restore(int TS_state)
{
if (TS_state)
stts();
}
/*
* The question "does this thread have fpu access?"
* is slightly racy, since preemption could come in
* and revoke it immediately after the test.
*
* However, even in that very unlikely scenario,
* we can just assume we have FPU access - typically
* to save the FP state - we'll just take a #NM
* fault and get the FPU access back.
*/
static inline int user_has_fpu(void)
{
return current->thread.fpu.has_fpu;
}
extern void unlazy_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk);
#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
#endif /* _ASM_X86_I387_H */
|
