diff options
author | 2020-04-22 23:20:52 -0400 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2020-05-29 11:05:54 -0400 | |
commit | e6c0433e270ae96fb62fd30cf7c2c7bf57d5391f (patch) | |
tree | aa74b98cdbafad36d7bb617f5a3bbf89406b2d01 /scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py | |
parent | efi_test: get rid of pointless access_ok() (diff) | |
download | linux-rng-e6c0433e270ae96fb62fd30cf7c2c7bf57d5391f.tar.xz linux-rng-e6c0433e270ae96fb62fd30cf7c2c7bf57d5391f.zip |
lpfc_debugfs: get rid of pointless access_ok()
No, you do NOT need to "protect copy from user" that way.
Incidentally, your userland ABI stinks. I understand that you
wanted to accept "reset" and "reset\n" as equivalent, but I suspect
that accepting "reset this, you !@^!@!" had been an accident.
Nothing to do about that now - it is a userland ABI...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Diffstat (limited to 'scripts/gdb/linux/utils.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions