btrfs: simplify last record detection at btrfs_clear_extent_bit_changeset()

Instead of checking for an end offset of (u64)-1 (U64_MAX) for the current
extent state's end, and then checking after updating the current start
offset if it's now beyond the range's end offset, we can simply stop if
the current extent state's end is greater than or equals to our range's
end offset. This helps remove one comparison under the 'next' label and
allows to remove the if statement that checks if the start offset is
greater than the end offset under the 'search_again' label.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions