aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/bpf/fixups.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2026-08-17bpf: Rewrite any fault prone load out of a mem or btf_id pointerDaniel Borkmann1-21/+26
bpf_convert_ctx_accesses() turns a BPF_LDX into a BPF_PROBE_MEM one by matching the type recorded for the insn against a list of exact pointer types. The list cannot keep up with the flag combinations the verifier produces, and a type which is missing from it ends up as a plain load without an exception table entry, so a bad address panics the kernel instead of being handled. Two such types exist today and are reachable: - PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_UNTRUSTED | MEM_ALLOC | NON_OWN_REF - PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_UNTRUSTED | MEM_RCU Rather than adding the two, just drop the list and state the property itself in the default case of the switch. This is a superset of what the list matched, the untrusted PTR_TO_MEM does not have to carry MEM_RDONLY for it anymore, and it stays in sync with the verifier side which uses the same match in save_aux_ptr_type() and reg_type_mismatch_ok(). Assert that a fault prone type which does not get the rewrite for whatever reason is rejected at load time rather than left to fault at runtime to catch any future cases. Fixes: 1b12171533a9 ("bpf: Mark direct ld of stashed bpf_{rb,list}_node as non-owning ref") Fixes: 6fcd486b3a0a ("bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260814215301.709827-4-daniel@iogearbox.net
2026-08-13bpf: Fix func_info_aux desync after dead code eliminationKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-1/+5
The verifier keeps per-subprogram metadata in three parallel arrays: subprog_info, func_info, and func_info_aux. Dead code elimination can remove whole subprograms, and adjust_subprog_starts_after_remove() shifts subprog_info and func_info to close the gap, but leaves func_info_aux in place. From that point on, func_info_aux[i] no longer describes subprogram i. Shift func_info_aux together with func_info so the three arrays stay aligned after subprogram removal. Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260808064523.DE3E71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260812231506.3558128-1-memxor@gmail.com
2026-08-13bpf: Introduce global percpu dataLeon Hwang1-0/+37
Introduce global percpu data, inspired by the commit 6316f78306c1 ("Merge branch 'support-global-data'"). It enables the definition of global percpu variables in BPF, similar to the include/linux/percpu-defs.h::DEFINE_PER_CPU() macro. For example, in BPF, it is able to define a global percpu variable like: int data SEC(".percpu"); With this patch, tools like retsnoop [1] and bpfsnoop [2] can simplify their BPF code for handling LBRs. The code can be updated from static struct perf_branch_entry lbrs[1][MAX_LBR_ENTRIES] SEC(".data.lbrs"); to static struct perf_branch_entry lbrs[MAX_LBR_ENTRIES] SEC(".percpu.lbrs"); This eliminates the need to retrieve the CPU ID using the bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper. Additionally, by reusing global percpu data map, sharing information between tail callers and callees or freplace callers and callees becomes simpler compared to reusing percpu_array maps. Links: [1] https://github.com/anakryiko/retsnoop [2] https://github.com/bpfsnoop/bpfsnoop Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260813152324.97937-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev
2026-08-13bpf: Drop duplicate blank lines in kernel/bpf/Leon Hwang1-1/+0
There are many adjacent blank lines in kernel/bpf/ that have accumulated over time. Drop them for cleanup. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260813152324.97937-2-leon.hwang@linux.dev
2026-08-13bpf: Eliminate dup/restore of insn_aux_dataXu Kuohai1-34/+2
The dup/restore of insn_aux_data was introduced to resolve the inconsistency between insnsi and insn_aux_data arrays, which occurs on the failure path where insnsi was rolled back to the original state before constants blinding, while insn_aux_data was not. After JIT failure, there is only one user, bpf_clear_insn_aux_data(), that requires insnsi and insn_aux_data to be synchronized. It accesses both insnsi and insn_aux_data using the same array size and index. However, the access to insnsi in bpf_clear_insn_aux_data() is not necessary. It is checked to skip the second slot of an ldimm64 instruction, whose jt is never set and can be absorbed into the jt check itself. So remove the access to insnsi from bpf_clear_insn_aux_data(), and add a specific length field for insn_aux_data to allow it to have a different length from the insnsi array. Then remove dup/restore of insn_aux_data. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/5a4528f019c8d2638c019a2f37475cccc16a9503.1785240296.git.xukuohai@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
2026-08-12bpf: Derive the atomic load register in one placeDaniel Borkmann1-10/+1
check_atomic_rmw() open codes the mapping from a BPF_ATOMIC to the register it reads the old value into, the BPF_STX case of insn_def_regno() open codes the very same mapping a second time, the const folding and the liveness transfer functions a third and a fourth time, and BPF JITs need it as well to know which register a faulting BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC has to clear. Add a small helper so that all of them can share it. No functional change. The BPF_LOAD_ACQ case is there for the JITs, which do walk all instruction classes. const_reg_xfer() loses its explicit BPF_ATOMIC mode test since the helper checks class and mode itself; the BPF_PROBE_ATOMIC it additionally accepts cannot be seen there as it is only set from bpf_do_misc_fixups(), that is, after const folding has run. arg_track_xfer() keeps its mode test since that also guards the stack clearing next to it. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260811131600.506721-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
2026-08-08bpf: Simplify the bpf_is_reg64()Eduard Zingerman1-82/+26
After the previous commit bpf_is_reg64() is only used in a context where destination register's property is queried, and only for instructions for which insn_def_regno() >= 0. Hence, simplify the function by: - removing unused parameters; - removing code paths considering BPF_JMP{,32} instructions; - streamlining the condition expressions. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260807-static-zext-v4-6-b6c270013c77@gmail.com
2026-08-08bpf: Infer zext_dst based on static register liveness analysisEduard Zingerman1-10/+17
As reported in the thread [1], the verifier's 32-bit operations zero extension logic is broken. This logic is responsible for correct semantics of 32-bit operations on s390 architecture. According to BPF semantics, operation `w1 += 1` is supposed to zero extend the upper half of the register `r1`. On s390 the JIT relies on the verifier emitting explicit zero extension before such operations. The verifier attempts to minimize the amount of zero extensions inserted by tracking whether upper halves of the 64-bit registers are ever used. Previously such tracking worked as follows: - bpf_reg_state->subreg_def field was set by do_check_insn() for each operation defining lower but not the upper halves of the register. - Whenever an operation reading the whole register was verified, the verifier checked register's subreg_def and set bpf_insn_aux_data->zext_dst flag as true via a call to mark_insn_zext() function. - After the verification was complete, a special pass bpf_opt_subreg_zext_lo32_rnd_hi32() extended 32-bit operations with bpf_insn_aux_data->zext_dst set as true by adding explicit zero extension. Note that the logic above relies on bpf_reg_state->subreg_def, which is a property of a current verifier state. Before the commit [2] two additional steps happened: - The verifier tracked upper and lower register halves' liveness as flags REG_LIVE_READ{32,64} in bpf_reg_state->live. - The function propagate_liveness() called mark_insn_zext() in order to transfer the knowledge about which registers have their upper halves alive (and thus might require zero extension). The commit [2] removed the two steps described above, hence making possible a situation like below: - The register's upper half is set and is used on some verification path P1 and the register happens not to be marked as precise. - The checkpoint C is created while processing some instruction between register initialization and usage. - On some other verification path P2 the register's upper half is not initialized and that path ends hitting the checkpoint C. - In such a case the register's initialization on path P2 would lack zext_dst mark, making it possible for the program to inject an arbitrary value in the register's upper half. This commit replaces subreg_def based logic with computing zext_dst statically, as a part of the bpf_compute_live_registers() analysis: - The analysis now tracks usage of upper and lower halves of the registers separately. - If some instruction defines a 32-bit subregister, but not the whole register, *and* the upper half of the register is alive after that instruction, the instruction is marked as zext_dst. There is one notable drop in precision: whenever a BPF subprogram is called, all 64 bits of parameter registers are presumed to be used. The assumption is that such a drop in precision would not inflict a noticeable performance penalty. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAGKGUv=sOuqQtA1Ub-5JXfA4FPosJFYKAQE4B79cK+P1erxqtg@mail.gmail.com/ [2] commit 107e16979905 ("bpf: disable and remove registers chain based liveness") Fixes: 107e16979905 ("bpf: disable and remove registers chain based liveness") Reported-by: Min-gyu Kim <gimm78064@gmail.com> Reported-by: STAR Labs SG <info@starlabs.sg> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAGKGUv=sOuqQtA1Ub-5JXfA4FPosJFYKAQE4B79cK+P1erxqtg@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260807-static-zext-v4-5-b6c270013c77@gmail.com
2026-08-08bpf: Move bpf_is_reg64() to fixups.cEduard Zingerman1-0/+90
The following patches are going to remove bpf_is_reg64() users from everywhere except fixups.c, and also make it dependent on functions local to fixups.c. Move the function before hand to simplify the review. Non functional change. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260807-static-zext-v4-3-b6c270013c77@gmail.com
2026-08-08bpf: Extract is_addr_space_cast32() utility functionEduard Zingerman1-9/+26
bpf_do_misc_fixups() converts the following address space cast instructions to 32-bit moves: - cast from address space 1 (user) to address space 0 (kernel) - cast from address space 0 (kernel) to address space 1 (user) iff associated arena map has a BPF_F_NO_USER_CONV flag. Extract a predicate detecting such instructions for use in the following patches. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260807-static-zext-v4-2-b6c270013c77@gmail.com
2026-07-19bpf: Disallow interpreter fallback for BPF_ADDR_PERCPU insnLeon Hwang1-0/+5
The BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG insn requires JIT to emit native code to for 'dst_reg = src_reg + <percpu_base_off>'. However, the interpreter ignores the 'off' at its ALU64_MOV_X label. The 'off' indicates the insn is BPF_MOV64_PERCPU_REG insn. Then, when the interpreter loads memory from the register, it will hit a page fault. [ 2.545572] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffacaaf034 [ 2.546485] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [ 2.547167] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [ 2.547850] PGD 134e63067 P4D 134e63067 PUD 134e64063 PMD 10021c063 PTE 800ffffeca550062 [ 2.548912] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI Set jit_required as true in order to disallow interpreter fallback in core.c::__bpf_prog_select_runtime(), if any BPF_ADDR_PERCPU insn is patched to the prog. BTW, rename the helper bpf_map_supports_cpu_flags() to bpf_map_is_percpu_map(). Fixes: 7bdbf7446305 ("bpf: add special internal-only MOV instruction to resolve per-CPU addrs") Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260715141122.15783-4-leon.hwang@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
2026-07-08bpf: Reject programs with inlined helpers if JIT is not availableTiezhu Yang1-1/+3
When an architecture (such as LoongArch, ARM64, and RISC-V) implements bpf_jit_inlines_helper_call(), the verifier skips rewriting the helper call offset (insn->imm) in bpf_do_misc_fixups(). This is because the helper is expected to be inlined by the JIT compiler later. Therefore, insn->imm remains as the raw helper enum ID. However, if JIT is disabled at runtime (net.core.bpf_jit_enable=0) or if JIT compilation fails dynamically (e.g., due to OOM), the program falls back to the BPF interpreter. When the interpreter executes (__bpf_call_base + insn->imm) with the unpatched raw ID, it jumps into an invalid address space, triggering an instruction alignment fault or a kernel panic. Although these helpers have valid C implementations in the kernel, the omission of offset rewriting makes runtime interpreter fallback fatal. Fix this by setting 'prog->jit_required = 1' when helper call rewriting is skipped for JIT inlining. This ensures that such programs are safely rejected if JIT is not available, preventing the runtime kernel panic. Fixes: 2ddec2c80b44 ("riscv, bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id()") Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Suggested-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev> Acked-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
2026-07-08bpf: Introduce jit_required flag and remove bpf_prog_has_kfunc_call()Tiezhu Yang1-3/+2
Introduce a 'jit_required' bitfield flag in struct bpf_prog to track whether a BPF program strictly requires the JIT compiler to run. This prevents a dangerous runtime fallback to the interpreter for features that are only implemented in the JIT compiler. Currently, bpf_prog_has_kfunc_call() is used only for kernel function calls, replace the kfunc-specific helper with the new 'jit_required' flag. This makes it easy to support other JIT-only BPF features, such as inlined helpers. Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Suggested-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev> Suggested-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> Acked-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
2026-07-01bpf: Use BPF_CALL_IMM macro consistently in bpf_do_misc_fixupsTiezhu Yang1-1/+1
In bpf_do_misc_fixups(), the conversion from a function address to a BPF immediate value is handled using the BPF_CALL_IMM macro inside the 'patch_map_ops_generic' label block. However, immediately following it in the 'patch_call_imm' label block, the immediate value is calculated manually by subtracting __bpf_call_base from fn->func. Inspired by KaFai Wan's review comments on fixing helper call offsets, use the BPF_CALL_IMM macro in 'patch_call_imm' as well to clean this up. This removes the redundant manual pointer arithmetic and ensures coding style consistency across adjacent label blocks within the same function. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260701035107.8069-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
2026-06-07bpf: Add support for tracing_multi link sessionJiri Olsa1-0/+1
Adding support to use session attachment with tracing_multi link. Adding new BPF_TRACE_FSESSION_MULTI program attach type, that follows the BPF_TRACE_FSESSION behaviour but on the tracing_multi link. Such program is called on entry and exit of the attached function and allows to pass cookie value from entry to exit execution. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260606123955.345967-16-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-06-07bpf: Add multi tracing attach typesJiri Olsa1-0/+1
Adding new program attach types multi tracing attachment: BPF_TRACE_FENTRY_MULTI BPF_TRACE_FEXIT_MULTI and their base support in verifier code. Programs with such attach type will use specific link attachment interface coming in following changes. This was suggested by Andrii some (long) time ago and turned out to be easier than having special program flag for that. Bpf programs with such types have 'bpf_multi_func' function set as their attach_btf_id and keep module reference when it's specified by attach_prog_fd. They are also accepted as sleepable programs during verification, and the real validation for specific BTF_IDs/functions will happen during the multi link attachment in following changes. Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260606123955.345967-11-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-06-01bpf: Refactor object relationship tracking and fix dynptr UAF bugAmery Hung1-1/+1
Refactor object relationship tracking in the verifier and fix a dynptr use-after-free bug where file/skb dynptrs are not invalidated when the parent referenced object is freed. Add parent_id to bpf_reg_state to precisely track child-parent relationships. A child object's parent_id points to the parent object's id. This replaces the PTR_TO_MEM-specific dynptr_id. Remove ref_obj_id from bpf_reg_state by folding its role into the existing id field. Previously, id tracked pointer identity for null checking while ref_obj_id tracked the owning reference for lifetime management. These are now unified: acquire helpers and kfuncs set id to the acquired reference id, and release paths use id directly. Add reg_is_referenced() which checks if a register is referenced by looking up its id in the reference array. This replaces all former ref_obj_id checks. For release_reference(), invalidating an object now also invalidates all descendants by traversing the object tree. This is done using stack-based DFS to avoid recursive call chains of release_reference() -> unmark_stack_slots_dynptr() -> release_reference(). Referenced objects encountered during tree traversal are reported as leaked references. Add parent_id to bpf_reference_state to enable hierarchical reference tracking. When acquiring a reference, a parent_id can be specified to link the new reference to an existing one (e.g., referenced dynptrs acquire a reference with parent_id linking to the parent object's reference). Pointer casting: For pointer casting helpers (bpf_sk_fullsock, bpf_tcp_sock), instead of propagating ref_obj_id, the cast result reuses the same reference id as the source pointer. Since the cast may return NULL for a non-NULL input, the NULL case is explored as a separate verifier branch. This allows releasing any of the original or cast pointers to invalidate all others. Referenced dynptrs: When constructing a referenced dynptr, acquire a intermediate reference with parent_id linking to the parent referenced object. The dynptr and all clones share the same parent_id (pointing to the intermediate ref) but get unique ids for independent slice tracking. Releasing a referenced dynptr releases the parent reference, which in turn invalidates all clones and their derived slices. Owning to non-owning reference conversion: After converting owning to non-owning by clearing id (e.g., object(id=1) -> object(id=0)), the verifier releases the reference state via release_reference_nomark(). Note that the error message "reference has not been acquired before" in the helper and kfunc release paths is removed. This message was already unreachable. The verifier only calls release_reference() after confirming the reference is valid, so the condition could never trigger in practice. Fixes: 870c28588afa ("bpf: net_sched: Add basic bpf qdisc kfuncs") Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260529014936.2811085-6-ameryhung@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-05-25Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf 7.1-rc5Alexei Starovoitov1-4/+9
Cross-merge BPF and other fixes after downstream PR. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-05-17bpf,x86: Fix exception unwinding with outgoing stack argumentsYonghong Song1-0/+1
When a main program with exception_boundary has outgoing stack arguments (e.g. from calling subprogs with >5 args), bpf_throw() fails to correctly restore callee-saved registers, causing a kernel crash. The x86 JIT allocates the outgoing stack arg area below the callee-saved registers via 'sub rsp, outgoing_rsp' in the prologue. When bpf_throw() unwinds, it captures the main program's sp (which includes this outgoing area) and passes it to the exception callback. The callback gets rsp and rbp, followed by pop_callee_regs, but rsp points into the outgoing arg area rather than the callee-saved registers, so the pops restore garbage values. Returning to the kernel with corrupted callee-saved registers causes a crash. Fix this by adjusting the sp (adding stack_arg_sp_adjust) passed to the exception callback, so it points to the bottom of the callee-saved registers instead of the outgoing arg area. When stack_arg_sp_adjust is 0 (the common case), this is a no-op. Fixes: 324c3ca6eed6 ("bpf,x86: Implement JIT support for stack arguments") Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260517150702.288031-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-05-16bpf: Clean up redundant stack arg checks for non-JITed programsYonghong Song1-1/+1
Remove a redundant stack_arg_cnt check in __bpf_prog_select_runtime() and start the stack arg loop from index 0 in bpf_fixup_call_args(). Both changes are no-ops that simplify the code: In __bpf_prog_select_runtime(), the subprog_info[0].stack_arg_cnt check is unreachable: - when there is only a main program (no bpf-to-bpf calls), subprog_info[0].stack_arg_cnt is always 0 because the main program's arg_cnt is forced to 1 - when bpf-to-bpf calls use stack args and JIT succeeds, fp->bpf_func is set and this code is skipped - when JIT fails, bpf_fixup_call_args() rejects the program before we get to __bpf_prog_select_runtime(). In bpf_fixup_call_args(), starting the loop at i=1 skipped subprog 0, which is safe since the main program always has arg_cnt=1 and thus bpf_in_stack_arg_cnt() returns 0. Starting at i=0 removes the need to reason about this invariant. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260515225101.824054-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-05-13bpf: Reject stack arguments in non-JITed programsYonghong Song1-0/+6
The interpreter does not understand the bpf register r11 (BPF_REG_PARAMS) used for stack arguments. So reject interpreter usage if stack arguments are used either in the main program or any subprogram. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260513045049.2390444-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-05-13bpf: Support stack arguments for bpf functionsYonghong Song1-2/+14
Currently BPF functions (subprogs) are limited to 5 register arguments. With [1], the compiler can emit code that passes additional arguments via a dedicated stack area through bpf register BPF_REG_PARAMS (r11), introduced in an earlier patch ([2]). The compiler uses positive r11 offsets for incoming (callee-side) args and negative r11 offsets for outgoing (caller-side) args, following the x86_64/arm64 calling convention direction. There is an 8-byte gap at offset 0 separating two regions: Incoming (callee reads): r11+8 (arg6), r11+16 (arg7), ... Outgoing (caller writes): r11-8 (arg6), r11-16 (arg7), ... The following is an example to show how stack arguments are saved and transferred between caller and callee: int foo(int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5, int a6, int a7) { ... bar(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8); ... } Caller (foo) Callee (bar) ============ ============ Incoming (positive offsets): Incoming (positive offsets): r11+8: [incoming arg 6] r11+8: [incoming arg 6] <-+ r11+16: [incoming arg 7] r11+16: [incoming arg 7] <-|+ r11+24: [incoming arg 8] <-||+ Outgoing (negative offsets): ||| r11-8: [outgoing arg 6 to bar] -------->-------------------------+|| r11-16: [outgoing arg 7 to bar] -------->--------------------------+| r11-24: [outgoing arg 8 to bar] -------->---------------------------+ If the bpf function has more than one call: int foo(int a1, int a2, int a3, int a4, int a5, int a6, int a7) { ... bar1(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8); ... bar2(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9); ... } Caller (foo) Callee (bar2) ============ ============== Incoming (positive offsets): Incoming (positive offsets): r11+8: [incoming arg 6] r11+8: [incoming arg 6] <+ r11+16: [incoming arg 7] r11+16: [incoming arg 7] <|+ r11+24: [incoming arg 8] <||+ Outgoing for bar2 (negative offsets): r11+32: [incoming arg 9] <|||+ r11-8: [outgoing arg 6] ---->----------->-------------------------+||| r11-16: [outgoing arg 7] ---->----------->--------------------------+|| r11-24: [outgoing arg 8] ---->----------->---------------------------+| r11-32: [outgoing arg 9] ---->----------->----------------------------+ The verifier tracks outgoing stack arguments in stack_arg_regs[] and out_stack_arg_cnt in bpf_func_state, separately from the regular r10 stack. The callee does not copy incoming args — it reads them directly from the caller's outgoing slots at positive r11 offsets. Similar to stacksafe(), introduce stack_arg_safe() to do pruning check. Outgoing stack arg slots are invalidated when the callee returns (e.g. in prepare_func_exit), not at call time. This allows the callee to read incoming args from the caller's outgoing slots during verification. The following are a few examples. Example 1: *(u64 *)(r11 - 8) = r6; *(u64 *)(r11 - 16) = r7; call bar1; // arg6 = r6, arg7 = r7 call bar2; // expected with 2 stack arguments, failed Example 2: To fix the Example 1: *(u64 *)(r11 - 8) = r6; *(u64 *)(r11 - 16) = r7; call bar1; // arg6 = r6, arg7 = r7 *(u64 *)(r11 - 8) = r8; *(u64 *)(r11 - 16) = r9; call bar2; // arg6 = r8, arg7 = r9 Example 3: The compiler can hoist the shared stack arg stores above the branch: *(u64 *)(r11 - 16) = r7; if cond goto else; *(u64 *)(r11 - 8) = r8; call bar1; // arg6 = r8, arg7 = r7 goto end; else: *(u64 *)(r11 - 8) = r9; call bar2; // arg6 = r9, arg7 = r7 end: Example 4: Within a loop: loop: *(u64 *)(r11 - 8) = r6; // arg6, before loop call bar; // reuses arg6 each iteration if ... goto loop; A separate max_out_stack_arg_cnt field in bpf_subprog_info tracks the deepest outgoing slot actually written. This intends to reject programs that write to slots beyond what any callee expects. It is necessary for JIT. Similar to typical compiler generated code, enforce the following orderings: - all stack arg reads must be ahead of any stack arg write - all stack arg reads must be before any bpf func, kfunc and helpers This is needed as JIT may emit 'mov' insns for read/write with the same register and bpf function, kfunc and helper will invalidate all arguments immediately after the call. Callback functions with stack arguments need kernel setup parameter types (including stack parameters) properly and then callback function can retrieve such information for verification purpose. Global subprogs and freplace with >5 args are not yet supported. [1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/189060 [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260423033506.2542005-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/ Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260513045015.2385013-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-05-11bpf: Fix s16 truncation for large bpf-to-bpf call offsetsYazhou Tang1-3/+3
Currently, the BPF instruction set allows bpf-to-bpf calls (or internal calls, pseudo calls) to use a 32-bit imm field to represent the relative jump offset. However, when JIT is disabled or falls back to the interpreter, the verifier invokes bpf_patch_call_args() to rewrite the call instruction. In this function, the 32-bit imm is downcast to s16 and stored in the off field. void bpf_patch_call_args(struct bpf_insn *insn, u32 stack_depth) { stack_depth = max_t(u32, stack_depth, 1); insn->off = (s16) insn->imm; insn->imm = interpreters_args[(round_up(stack_depth, 32) / 32) - 1] - __bpf_call_base_args; insn->code = BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL_ARGS; } If the original imm exceeds the s16 range (i.e., a jump offset greater than 32767 instructions), this downcast silently truncates the offset, resulting in an incorrect call target. Fix this by: 1. In bpf_patch_call_args(), keeping the imm field unchanged and using the off field to store the index of the interpreter function. 2. In ___bpf_prog_run() for the JMP_CALL_ARGS case, retrieving the interpreter function pointer from the interpreters_args array using the off field as the index, and passing the original imm to calculate the last argument of the interpreter function. After these changes, the truncation issue is resolved, and __bpf_call_base_args is also no longer needed and can be removed, which makes the code cleaner. Performance: In ___bpf_prog_run() for the JMP_CALL_ARGS case, changing the retrieval of the interpreter function pointer from pointer addition to direct array indexing improves performance. The possible reason is that the latter has better instruction-level parallelism. See the v5 discussion [1] for more details. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/f120c3c4-6999-414a-b514-518bb64b4758@zju.edu.cn/ To avoid requiring bpftool changes, keep the new imm/off encoding internal and restore the legacy xlated dump layout in bpf_insn_prepare_dump(). For bpf-to-bpf call offsets that do not fit in s16, export off as 0 instead of a truncated and misleading value. Fixes: 1ea47e01ad6e ("bpf: add support for bpf_call to interpreter") Fixes: 7105e828c087 ("bpf: allow for correlation of maps and helpers in dump") Suggested-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com> Suggested-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org> Co-developed-by: Tianci Cao <ziye@zju.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao <ziye@zju.edu.cn> Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com> Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com> Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang <tangyazhou518@outlook.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260506094714.419842-3-tangyazhou@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-05-11bpf: Fix out-of-bounds read in bpf_patch_call_args()Yazhou Tang1-1/+6
The interpreters_args array only accommodates stack depths up to MAX_BPF_STACK (512 bytes). However, do_misc_fixups() may allow a larger stack depth if JIT is requested. If JIT compilation later fails and falls back to the interpreter, the verifier invokes bpf_patch_call_args() with this oversized stack depth. This causes a load-time out-of-bounds (OOB) read when calculating the interpreter function pointer index. Fix this by changing bpf_patch_call_args() to return an int and explicitly rejecting the JIT fallback (returning -EINVAL) if the stack depth exceeds MAX_BPF_STACK. Fixes: 1ea47e01ad6e ("bpf: add support for bpf_call to interpreter") Co-developed-by: Tianci Cao <ziye@zju.edu.cn> Signed-off-by: Tianci Cao <ziye@zju.edu.cn> Co-developed-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com> Signed-off-by: Shenghao Yuan <shenghaoyuan0928@163.com> Signed-off-by: Yazhou Tang <tangyazhou518@outlook.com> Acked-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260506094714.419842-2-tangyazhou@zju.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-04-16bpf: Add helper to detect indirect jump targetsXu Kuohai1-0/+12
Introduce helper bpf_insn_is_indirect_target to check whether a BPF instruction is an indirect jump target. Since the verifier knows which instructions are indirect jump targets, add a new flag indirect_target to struct bpf_insn_aux_data to mark them. The verifier sets this flag when verifying an indirect jump target instruction, and the helper checks the flag to determine whether an instruction is an indirect jump target. Reviewed-by: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com> #v8 Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com> #v12 Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416064341.151802-4-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-04-16bpf: Pass bpf_verifier_env to JITXu Kuohai1-5/+5
Pass bpf_verifier_env to bpf_int_jit_compile(). The follow-up patch will use env->insn_aux_data in the JIT stage to detect indirect jump targets. Since bpf_prog_select_runtime() can be called by cbpf and lib/test_bpf.c code without verifier, introduce helper __bpf_prog_select_runtime() to accept the env parameter. Remove the call to bpf_prog_select_runtime() in bpf_prog_load(), and switch to call __bpf_prog_select_runtime() in the verifier, with env variable passed. The original bpf_prog_select_runtime() is preserved for cbpf and lib/test_bpf.c, where env is NULL. Now all constants blinding calls are moved into the verifier, except the cbpf and lib/test_bpf.c cases. The instructions arrays are adjusted by bpf_patch_insn_data() function for normal cases, so there is no need to call adjust_insn_arrays() in bpf_jit_blind_constants(). Remove it. Reviewed-by: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com> # v8 Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com> # v12 Acked-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> # v14 Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416064341.151802-3-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-04-16bpf: Move constants blinding out of arch-specific JITsXu Kuohai1-23/+123
During the JIT stage, constants blinding rewrites instructions but only rewrites the private instruction copy of the JITed subprog, leaving the global env->prog->insnsi and env->insn_aux_data untouched. This causes a mismatch between subprog instructions and the global state, making it difficult to use the global data in the JIT. To avoid this mismatch, and given that all arch-specific JITs already support constants blinding, move it to the generic verifier code, and switch to rewrite the global env->prog->insnsi with the global states adjusted, as other rewrites in the verifier do. This removes the constants blinding calls in each JIT, which are largely duplicated code across architectures. Since constants blinding is only required for JIT, and there are two JIT entry functions, jit_subprogs() for BPF programs with multiple subprogs and bpf_prog_select_runtime() for programs with no subprogs, move the constants blinding invocation into these two functions. In the verifier path, bpf_patch_insn_data() is used to keep global verifier auxiliary data in sync with patched instructions. A key question is whether this global auxiliary data should be restored on the failure path. Besides instructions, bpf_patch_insn_data() adjusts: - prog->aux->poke_tab - env->insn_array_maps - env->subprog_info - env->insn_aux_data For prog->aux->poke_tab, it is only used by JIT or only meaningful after JIT succeeds, so it does not need to be restored on the failure path. For env->insn_array_maps, when JIT fails, programs using insn arrays are rejected by bpf_insn_array_ready() due to missing JIT addresses. Hence, env->insn_array_maps is only meaningful for JIT and does not need to be restored. For subprog_info, if jit_subprogs fails and CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not enabled, kernel falls back to interpreter. In this case, env->subprog_info is used to determine subprogram stack depth. So it must be restored on failure. For env->insn_aux_data, it is freed by clear_insn_aux_data() at the end of bpf_check(). Before freeing, clear_insn_aux_data() loops over env->insn_aux_data to release jump targets recorded in it. The loop uses env->prog->len as the array length, but this length no longer matches the actual size of the adjusted env->insn_aux_data array after constants blinding. To address it, a simple approach is to keep insn_aux_data as adjusted after failure, since it will be freed shortly, and record its actual size for the loop in clear_insn_aux_data(). But since clear_insn_aux_data() uses the same index to loop over both env->prog->insnsi and env->insn_aux_data, this approach results in incorrect index for the insnsi array. So an alternative approach is adopted: clone the original env->insn_aux_data before blinding and restore it after failure, similar to env->prog. For classic BPF programs, constants blinding works as before since it is still invoked from bpf_prog_select_runtime(). Reviewed-by: Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@gmail.com> # v8 Reviewed-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com> # powerpc jit Reviewed-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com> # riscv jit Acked-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> # loongarch jit Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260416064341.151802-2-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-04-15bpf: copy BPF token from main program to subprogramsEduard Zingerman1-0/+1
bpf_jit_subprogs() copies various fields from the main program's aux to each subprogram's aux, but omits the BPF token. This causes bpf_prog_kallsyms_add() to fail for subprograms loaded via BPF token, as bpf_token_capable() falls back to capable() in init_user_ns when token is NULL. Copy prog->aux->token to func[i]->aux->token so that subprograms inherit the same capability delegation as the main program. Fixes: d79a35497547 ("bpf: Consistently use BPF token throughout BPF verifier logic") Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <ctao@meta.com> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260415-subprog-token-fix-v4-1-9bd000e8b068@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2026-04-12bpf: Move fixup/post-processing logic from verifier.c into fixups.cAlexei Starovoitov1-0/+2457
verifier.c is huge. Split fixup/post-processing logic that runs after the verifier accepted the program into fixups.c. Mechanical move. No functional changes. Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260412152936.54262-2-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>