aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>2025-07-01 16:04:26 +0200
committerPratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>2025-07-03 17:12:17 +0200
commit2e3a7476ec3989e77270b9481e76e137824b17c0 (patch)
tree09e6a1f14249d132f4a70a5ffccc12044a845923
parentdt-bindings: mtd: jedec,spi-nor: Add atmel,at26* compatible string (diff)
downloadwireguard-linux-2e3a7476ec3989e77270b9481e76e137824b17c0.tar.xz
wireguard-linux-2e3a7476ec3989e77270b9481e76e137824b17c0.zip
mtd: spi-nor: Fix spi_nor_try_unlock_all()
Commit ff67592cbdfc ("mtd: spi-nor: Introduce spi_nor_set_mtd_info()") moved all initialization of the mtd fields at the end of spi_nor_scan(). Normally, the mtd info is only needed for the mtd ops on the device, with one exception: spi_nor_try_unlock_all(), which will also make use of the mtd->size parameter. With that commit, the size will always be zero because it is not initialized. Fix that by not using the size of the mtd_info struct, but use the size from struct spi_nor_flash_parameter. Fixes: ff67592cbdfc ("mtd: spi-nor: Introduce spi_nor_set_mtd_info()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Jean-Marc Ranger <jmranger@hotmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/DM6PR06MB561177323DC5207E34AF2A06C547A@DM6PR06MB5611.namprd06.prod.outlook.com/ Tested-by: Jean-Marc Ranger <jmranger@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250701140426.2355182-1-mwalle@kernel.org
-rw-r--r--drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c19
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
index 9c9328478d8a..9b07f83aeac7 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/swp.c
@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@ static u64 spi_nor_get_min_prot_length_sr(struct spi_nor *nor)
static void spi_nor_get_locked_range_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr, loff_t *ofs,
u64 *len)
{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
u64 min_prot_len;
u8 mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
u8 tb_mask = spi_nor_get_sr_tb_mask(nor);
@@ -77,13 +76,13 @@ static void spi_nor_get_locked_range_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, u8 sr, loff_t *ofs,
min_prot_len = spi_nor_get_min_prot_length_sr(nor);
*len = min_prot_len << (bp - 1);
- if (*len > mtd->size)
- *len = mtd->size;
+ if (*len > nor->params->size)
+ *len = nor->params->size;
if (nor->flags & SNOR_F_HAS_SR_TB && sr & tb_mask)
*ofs = 0;
else
- *ofs = mtd->size - *len;
+ *ofs = nor->params->size - *len;
}
/*
@@ -158,7 +157,6 @@ static bool spi_nor_is_unlocked_sr(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len,
*/
static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
u64 min_prot_len;
int ret, status_old, status_new;
u8 mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
@@ -183,7 +181,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
can_be_bottom = false;
/* If anything above us is unlocked, we can't use 'top' protection */
- if (!spi_nor_is_locked_sr(nor, ofs + len, mtd->size - (ofs + len),
+ if (!spi_nor_is_locked_sr(nor, ofs + len, nor->params->size - (ofs + len),
status_old))
can_be_top = false;
@@ -195,11 +193,11 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
/* lock_len: length of region that should end up locked */
if (use_top)
- lock_len = mtd->size - ofs;
+ lock_len = nor->params->size - ofs;
else
lock_len = ofs + len;
- if (lock_len == mtd->size) {
+ if (lock_len == nor->params->size) {
val = mask;
} else {
min_prot_len = spi_nor_get_min_prot_length_sr(nor);
@@ -248,7 +246,6 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
*/
static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
{
- struct mtd_info *mtd = &nor->mtd;
u64 min_prot_len;
int ret, status_old, status_new;
u8 mask = spi_nor_get_sr_bp_mask(nor);
@@ -273,7 +270,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
can_be_top = false;
/* If anything above us is locked, we can't use 'bottom' protection */
- if (!spi_nor_is_unlocked_sr(nor, ofs + len, mtd->size - (ofs + len),
+ if (!spi_nor_is_unlocked_sr(nor, ofs + len, nor->params->size - (ofs + len),
status_old))
can_be_bottom = false;
@@ -285,7 +282,7 @@ static int spi_nor_sr_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, u64 len)
/* lock_len: length of region that should remain locked */
if (use_top)
- lock_len = mtd->size - (ofs + len);
+ lock_len = nor->params->size - (ofs + len);
else
lock_len = ofs;