aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2015-09-18 08:45:22 -0700
committerPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2015-10-06 11:16:42 -0700
commit7f5f873c6a0772970d5fee1f364231207051ecd8 (patch)
treeca06a26b0a485a63cf42417a12dea443a0df103c
parentrcu: Remove deprecated rcu_lockdep_assert() (diff)
downloadwireguard-linux-7f5f873c6a0772970d5fee1f364231207051ecd8.tar.xz
wireguard-linux-7f5f873c6a0772970d5fee1f364231207051ecd8.zip
rculist: Use WRITE_ONCE() when deleting from reader-visible list
The various RCU list-deletion macros (list_del_rcu(), hlist_del_init_rcu(), hlist_del_rcu(), hlist_bl_del_init_rcu(), hlist_bl_del_rcu(), hlist_nulls_del_init_rcu(), and hlist_nulls_del_rcu()) do plain stores into the ->next pointer of the preceding list elemment. Unfortunately, the compiler is within its rights to (for example) use byte-at-a-time writes to update the pointer, which would fatally confuse concurrent readers. This patch therefore adds the needed WRITE_ONCE() macros. KernelThreadSanitizer (KTSAN) reported the __hlist_del() issue, which is a problem when __hlist_del() is invoked by hlist_del_rcu(). Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-rw-r--r--include/linux/list.h5
-rw-r--r--include/linux/list_bl.h5
-rw-r--r--include/linux/list_nulls.h3
3 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
index 3e3e64a61002..993395a2e55c 100644
--- a/include/linux/list.h
+++ b/include/linux/list.h
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static inline void list_add_tail(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *head)
static inline void __list_del(struct list_head * prev, struct list_head * next)
{
next->prev = prev;
- prev->next = next;
+ WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, next);
}
/**
@@ -615,7 +615,8 @@ static inline void __hlist_del(struct hlist_node *n)
{
struct hlist_node *next = n->next;
struct hlist_node **pprev = n->pprev;
- *pprev = next;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(*pprev, next);
if (next)
next->pprev = pprev;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/list_bl.h b/include/linux/list_bl.h
index 2eb88556c5c5..8132214e8efd 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_bl.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_bl.h
@@ -93,9 +93,10 @@ static inline void __hlist_bl_del(struct hlist_bl_node *n)
LIST_BL_BUG_ON((unsigned long)n & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK);
/* pprev may be `first`, so be careful not to lose the lock bit */
- *pprev = (struct hlist_bl_node *)
+ WRITE_ONCE(*pprev,
+ (struct hlist_bl_node *)
((unsigned long)next |
- ((unsigned long)*pprev & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK));
+ ((unsigned long)*pprev & LIST_BL_LOCKMASK)));
if (next)
next->pprev = pprev;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/list_nulls.h b/include/linux/list_nulls.h
index f266661d2666..444d2b1313bd 100644
--- a/include/linux/list_nulls.h
+++ b/include/linux/list_nulls.h
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ static inline void __hlist_nulls_del(struct hlist_nulls_node *n)
{
struct hlist_nulls_node *next = n->next;
struct hlist_nulls_node **pprev = n->pprev;
- *pprev = next;
+
+ WRITE_ONCE(*pprev, next);
if (!is_a_nulls(next))
next->pprev = pprev;
}