diff options
author | 2024-11-12 14:10:31 +0200 | |
---|---|---|
committer | 2024-11-25 08:32:40 +0100 | |
commit | c05c5e5aa163f4682ca97a2f0536575fc7dbdecb (patch) | |
tree | c772adaa4a00be81426b7bba3be5afad0dd5c6be | |
parent | selftests: net: test extacks in netlink dumps (diff) | |
download | wireguard-linux-c05c5e5aa163f4682ca97a2f0536575fc7dbdecb.tar.xz wireguard-linux-c05c5e5aa163f4682ca97a2f0536575fc7dbdecb.zip |
xfrm: replay: Fix the update of replay_esn->oseq_hi for GSO
When skb needs GSO and wrap around happens, if xo->seq.low (seqno of
the first skb segment) is before the last seq number but oseq (seqno
of the last segment) is after it, xo->seq.low is still bigger than
replay_esn->oseq while oseq is smaller than it, so the update of
replay_esn->oseq_hi is missed for this case wrap around because of
the change in the cited commit.
For example, if sending a packet with gso_segs=3 while old
replay_esn->oseq=0xfffffffe, we calculate:
xo->seq.low = 0xfffffffe + 1 = 0x0xffffffff
oseq = 0xfffffffe + 3 = 0x1
(oseq < replay_esn->oseq) is true, but (xo->seq.low <
replay_esn->oseq) is false, so replay_esn->oseq_hi is not incremented.
To fix this issue, change the outer checking back for the update of
replay_esn->oseq_hi. And add new checking inside for the update of
packet's oseq_hi.
Fixes: 4b549ccce941 ("xfrm: replay: Fix ESN wrap around for GSO")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-rw-r--r-- | net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c index bc56c6305725..235bbefc2aba 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_replay.c @@ -714,10 +714,12 @@ static int xfrm_replay_overflow_offload_esn(struct xfrm_state *x, struct sk_buff oseq += skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs; } - if (unlikely(xo->seq.low < replay_esn->oseq)) { - XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output.hi = ++oseq_hi; - xo->seq.hi = oseq_hi; - replay_esn->oseq_hi = oseq_hi; + if (unlikely(oseq < replay_esn->oseq)) { + replay_esn->oseq_hi = ++oseq_hi; + if (xo->seq.low < replay_esn->oseq) { + XFRM_SKB_CB(skb)->seq.output.hi = oseq_hi; + xo->seq.hi = oseq_hi; + } if (replay_esn->oseq_hi == 0) { replay_esn->oseq--; replay_esn->oseq_hi--; |