aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstatshomepage
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLiam Ni <zhiguangni01@gmail.com>2023-10-26 10:03:29 +0800
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2023-12-10 16:51:34 -0800
commitff6c3d81f2e86b63a3a530683f89ef393882782a (patch)
tree2c2638f84588f6a313b8cb77aceaaefb4b9f14ed
parentmm: huge_memory: batch tlb flush when splitting a pte-mapped THP (diff)
downloadwireguard-linux-ff6c3d81f2e86b63a3a530683f89ef393882782a.tar.xz
wireguard-linux-ff6c3d81f2e86b63a3a530683f89ef393882782a.zip
NUMA: optimize detection of memory with no node id assigned by firmware
Sanity check that makes sure the nodes cover all memory loops over numa_meminfo to count the pages that have node id assigned by the firmware, then loops again over memblock.memory to find the total amount of memory and in the end checks that the difference between the total memory and memory that covered by nodes is less than some threshold. Worse, the loop over numa_meminfo calls __absent_pages_in_range() that also partially traverses memblock.memory. It's much simpler and more efficient to have a single traversal of memblock.memory that verifies that amount of memory not covered by nodes is less than a threshold. Introduce memblock_validate_numa_coverage() that does exactly that and use it instead of numa_meminfo_cover_memory(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231026020329.327329-1-zhiguangni01@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Liam Ni <zhiguangni01@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Bibo Mao <maobibo@loongson.cn> Cc: Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@loongson.cn> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Feiyang Chen <chenfeiyang@loongson.cn> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c28
-rw-r--r--arch/x86/mm/numa.c34
-rw-r--r--include/linux/memblock.h1
-rw-r--r--mm/memblock.c34
4 files changed, 38 insertions, 59 deletions
diff --git a/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c b/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c
index 6e65ff12d5c7..8fe21f868f72 100644
--- a/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c
+++ b/arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c
@@ -226,32 +226,6 @@ static void __init node_mem_init(unsigned int node)
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
-/*
- * Sanity check to catch more bad NUMA configurations (they are amazingly
- * common). Make sure the nodes cover all memory.
- */
-static bool __init numa_meminfo_cover_memory(const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
-{
- int i;
- u64 numaram, biosram;
-
- numaram = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
- u64 s = mi->blk[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- u64 e = mi->blk[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
-
- numaram += e - s;
- numaram -= __absent_pages_in_range(mi->blk[i].nid, s, e);
- if ((s64)numaram < 0)
- numaram = 0;
- }
- max_pfn = max_low_pfn;
- biosram = max_pfn - absent_pages_in_range(0, max_pfn);
-
- BUG_ON((s64)(biosram - numaram) >= (1 << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT)));
- return true;
-}
-
static void __init add_node_intersection(u32 node, u64 start, u64 size, u32 type)
{
static unsigned long num_physpages;
@@ -396,7 +370,7 @@ int __init init_numa_memory(void)
return -EINVAL;
init_node_memblock();
- if (numa_meminfo_cover_memory(&numa_meminfo) == false)
+ if (!memblock_validate_numa_coverage(SZ_1M))
return -EINVAL;
for_each_node_mask(node, node_possible_map) {
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index b29ceb19e46e..adc497b93f03 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -450,37 +450,6 @@ int __node_distance(int from, int to)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__node_distance);
/*
- * Sanity check to catch more bad NUMA configurations (they are amazingly
- * common). Make sure the nodes cover all memory.
- */
-static bool __init numa_meminfo_cover_memory(const struct numa_meminfo *mi)
-{
- u64 numaram, e820ram;
- int i;
-
- numaram = 0;
- for (i = 0; i < mi->nr_blks; i++) {
- u64 s = mi->blk[i].start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- u64 e = mi->blk[i].end >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- numaram += e - s;
- numaram -= __absent_pages_in_range(mi->blk[i].nid, s, e);
- if ((s64)numaram < 0)
- numaram = 0;
- }
-
- e820ram = max_pfn - absent_pages_in_range(0, max_pfn);
-
- /* We seem to lose 3 pages somewhere. Allow 1M of slack. */
- if ((s64)(e820ram - numaram) >= (1 << (20 - PAGE_SHIFT))) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "NUMA: nodes only cover %LuMB of your %LuMB e820 RAM. Not used.\n",
- (numaram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20,
- (e820ram << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20);
- return false;
- }
- return true;
-}
-
-/*
* Mark all currently memblock-reserved physical memory (which covers the
* kernel's own memory ranges) as hot-unswappable.
*/
@@ -585,7 +554,8 @@ static int __init numa_register_memblks(struct numa_meminfo *mi)
return -EINVAL;
}
}
- if (!numa_meminfo_cover_memory(mi))
+
+ if (!memblock_validate_numa_coverage(SZ_1M))
return -EINVAL;
/* Finally register nodes. */
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index ae3bde302f70..b695f9e946da 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ int memblock_physmem_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
void memblock_trim_memory(phys_addr_t align);
bool memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
+bool memblock_validate_numa_coverage(unsigned long threshold_bytes);
int memblock_mark_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
int memblock_clear_hotplug(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
int memblock_mark_mirror(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size);
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 5a88d6d24d79..4a62f7774b65 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -735,6 +735,40 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_add(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
}
/**
+ * memblock_validate_numa_coverage - check if amount of memory with
+ * no node ID assigned is less than a threshold
+ * @threshold_bytes: maximal number of pages that can have unassigned node
+ * ID (in bytes).
+ *
+ * A buggy firmware may report memory that does not belong to any node.
+ * Check if amount of such memory is below @threshold_bytes.
+ *
+ * Return: true on success, false on failure.
+ */
+bool __init_memblock memblock_validate_numa_coverage(unsigned long threshold_bytes)
+{
+ unsigned long nr_pages = 0;
+ unsigned long start_pfn, end_pfn, mem_size_mb;
+ int nid, i;
+
+ /* calculate lose page */
+ for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start_pfn, &end_pfn, &nid) {
+ if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
+ nr_pages += end_pfn - start_pfn;
+ }
+
+ if ((nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) >= threshold_bytes) {
+ mem_size_mb = memblock_phys_mem_size() >> 20;
+ pr_err("NUMA: no nodes coverage for %luMB of %luMB RAM\n",
+ (nr_pages << PAGE_SHIFT) >> 20, mem_size_mb);
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+
+/**
* memblock_isolate_range - isolate given range into disjoint memblocks
* @type: memblock type to isolate range for
* @base: base of range to isolate