arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916/39: Rename &blsp1_uartN -> &blsp_uartN

For some reason the BLSP UART controllers have a label with a number
behind blsp (&blsp1_uartN) while I2C/SPI are named without (&blsp_i2cN).
This is confusing, especially for proper node ordering in board DTs.

Right now all board DTs are ordered as if the number behind blsp does
not exist (&blsp_i2cN comes before &blsp1_uartN). Strictly speaking
correct ordering would be the other way around ('1' comes before '_').

End this confusion by giving the UART controllers consistent labels.
There is just one BLSP on MSM8916/39 so the number is redundant.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230525-msm8916-labels-v1-2-bec0f5fb46fb@gerhold.net

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dts
index e75ee34cb014..07f4c6398b41 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/apq8039-t2.dts
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@
 	aliases {
 		mmc0 = &sdhc_1;
 		mmc1 = &sdhc_2;
-		serial0 = &blsp1_uart1;
-		serial1 = &blsp1_uart2;
+		serial0 = &blsp_uart1;
+		serial1 = &blsp_uart2;
 	};
 
 	bl: backlight {
@@ -115,19 +115,19 @@
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
-&blsp1_uart1 {
+&blsp_uart1 {
 	status = "okay";
 };
 
-&blsp1_uart1_default {
+&blsp_uart1_default {
 	pins = "gpio0", "gpio1";
 };
 
-&blsp1_uart1_sleep {
+&blsp_uart1_sleep {
 	pins = "gpio0", "gpio1";
 };
 
-&blsp1_uart2 {
+&blsp_uart2 {
 	status = "okay";
 };