diff options
| author |   Luke Nelson <lukenels@cs.washington.edu> | 2020-05-05 17:03:17 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer |   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2020-05-06 09:48:15 +0200 |
| commit | 0224b2acea0f9e3908d33e27b2dcb4e04686e997 (patch) | |
| tree | 2db8ed7242e21b2c7b59b36ecc99fdd0e7bf1107 /arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | |
| parent | sysctl: Fix unused function warning (diff) | |
| download | wireguard-linux-0224b2acea0f9e3908d33e27b2dcb4e04686e997.tar.xz wireguard-linux-0224b2acea0f9e3908d33e27b2dcb4e04686e997.zip | |
bpf, riscv: Enable missing verifier_zext optimizations on RV64
Commit 66d0d5a854a6 ("riscv: bpf: eliminate zero extension code-gen")
added support for the verifier zero-extension optimization on RV64 and
commit 46dd3d7d287b ("bpf, riscv: Enable zext optimization for more
RV64G ALU ops") enabled it for more instruction cases.
However, BPF_LSH BPF_X and BPF_{LSH,RSH,ARSH} BPF_K are still missing
the optimization.
This patch enables the zero-extension optimization for these remaining
cases.
Co-developed-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luke Nelson <luke.r.nels@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200506000320.28965-2-luke.r.nels@gmail.com
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index d208a9fd6c52..e2636902a74e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ int bpf_jit_emit_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct rv_jit_context *ctx, case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X: case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X: emit(is64 ? rv_sll(rd, rd, rs) : rv_sllw(rd, rd, rs), ctx); - if (!is64) + if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext) emit_zext_32(rd, ctx); break; case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_X: @@ -692,19 +692,19 @@ out_be: case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_K: case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_K: emit(is64 ? rv_slli(rd, rd, imm) : rv_slliw(rd, rd, imm), ctx); - if (!is64) + if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext) emit_zext_32(rd, ctx); break; case BPF_ALU | BPF_RSH | BPF_K: case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_RSH | BPF_K: emit(is64 ? rv_srli(rd, rd, imm) : rv_srliw(rd, rd, imm), ctx); - if (!is64) + if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext) emit_zext_32(rd, ctx); break; case BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K: case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_ARSH | BPF_K: emit(is64 ? rv_srai(rd, rd, imm) : rv_sraiw(rd, rd, imm), ctx); - if (!is64) + if (!is64 && !aux->verifier_zext) emit_zext_32(rd, ctx); break; |